Considerations about Parameters Estimation into a Minimum Variance Control System
Source abstract
Abstract
The starting point to design a minimum variance control law consists in identifying a linearized mathematical model (valid around an operating point) of a nonlinear process, respectively the on-line estimation of the parameters of this model. This paper presents a comparative study regarding the estimation of these parameters for the case when the process operates in open-loop, respectively the process is integrated into a closed-loop system specific to a minimum variance control. The comparison is made both analytically (for the general case) and through a validation study (by simulation) particularized for the case of an induction generator integrated into a wind energy conversion system. The main contribution of this paper consists in proving the fact that, in closed-loop (under the constraints imposed by the control law), the process parameters estimates differ from the real ones identified in open-loop (in free operating mode, without constraints). In addition, as a novelty, the paper demonstrates that, in steady-state, the process gain estimates are identical, both in closed-loop and open-loop, even though they are calculated based on different estimates of these linear model parameters. Thus, based on parameters estimates in closed-loop, the parameter estimator rather allows the estimation of the real process gain, although it does not accurately estimate the real values of the linearized model parameters (correctly estimated only in open-loop).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Control Systems and Identification · Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Real-time simulation and control systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Automation and Applied Informatics, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Benosman, M. (2017). Learning-Based Adaptive Control. An Extremum Seeking Approach-Theory and Applications, Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier.
2. Control: A perspective10.1016/j.automatica.2013.10.012 ↗
3. Self-Tuning Controller
4. Aström, K.J., and Wittenmark, B. (1989). Adaptive Control, Addison-Wesley.
5. Bobal, V., Böhm, V., Fessl, J., and Machácek, J. (2005). Digital Self-Tuning Controllers: Algorithms, Implementation and Applications (Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing), Springer.
6. Mikles, J., and Fikar, M. (2007). Process Modelling, Identification, and Control, Springer.
7. Filip, I., Prostean, O., Szeidert, I., and Vasar, C. (2007, January 19–21). Consideration regarding the convergence and stability of an adaptive self-tuning control system. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Computational Cybernetics, Gammarth, Tunisia.10.1109/ICCCYB.2007.4402020 ↗
8. Tuning the control penalty factor of a minimum variance adaptive controller10.1016/j.ejcon.2017.04.005 ↗
9. Self-tuning strategy for a minimum variance control system of a highly disturbed process10.1016/j.ejcon.2018.06.004 ↗
10. Ishchenko, A., Myrzik, J.M.A., and Kling, W.L. (2007, January 24–28). Linearization of Dynamic Model of Squirrel-Cage Induction Generator Wind Turbine. Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Tampa, FL, USA.10.1109/PES.2007.386079 ↗
11. Zou, Y., Elbuluk, M., and Sozer, Y. (2010, January 3–7). A Complete Modeling and Simulation of Induction Generator Wind Power Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS), Houston, TX, USA.10.1109/IAS.2010.5615388 ↗
12. Mathematical modelling and numerical simulation of the dual winded induction generator’s operating regimes
13. Filip, I., Dragan, F., Szeidert, I., and Albu, A. (2020). Minimum-Variance Control System with Variable Control Penalty Factor. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10072274 ↗
14. Filip, I., Mihet-Popa, L., Vasar, C., Prostean, O., and Szeidert, I. (2019). Considerations Regarding the Design of a Minimum Variance Control System for an Induction Generator. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8050532 ↗
15. Givens orthogonal transformation-based estimator versus RLS estimator-Case study for an induction generator model
16. Convergence of large-deviation estimators10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052104 ↗
17. Online Parameter Estimation of a Transient Induction Generator Model Based on the Hybrid Method10.1109/TEC.2018.2808238 ↗
18. Wu, D., Song, J., and Shen, Y. (2016, January 28–30). Variable forgetting factor identification algorithm for fault diagnosis of wind turbines. Proceedings of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Yinchuan, China.10.1109/CCDC.2016.7531292 ↗
19. The large deviation for the least squares estimator of nonlinear regression model based on WOD errors
20. An Improved Structure of an Adaptive Excitation Control System Operating under Short-Circuit10.4316/AECE.2016.02006 ↗
21. Ni, K., Hu, Y., Liu, Y., and Gan, C. (2017). Performance Analysis of a Four-Switch Three-Phase Grid-Side Converter with Modulation Simplification in a Doubly-Fed Induction Generator-Based Wind Turbine (DFIG-WT) with Different External Disturbances. Energies, 10.10.3390/en10050706 ↗
22. Filip, I., and Vasar, C. (2007, January 17–18). About Initial Setting of a Self-Tuning Controller. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, SACI, Timisoara, Romania.
23. Issues regarding the tuning of a minimum variance adaptive controller
24. Multivariable Self-Tuning Control of a Turbine Generator System10.1109/TEC.2009.2015976 ↗
25. Data-driven minimum variance control using regulatory closed-loop data based on the FRIT method
26. Self-Tuning State-Feedback Control of Rotary Pendulum via Online Adaptive Reconfiguration of Control Penalty-Factor