The Effects of Age and Initial Shoulder Posture on the Upper Limb Range of Harvesting Movements among Oil Palm Harvesters
Source abstract
Abstract
The occurrence of musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) among oil palm harvesters has been studied extensively, but there is a lack of published studies on the evaluation of the range of harvesting movements. This information is important to design the ergonomic tools needed in the manual harvesting of oil palm. We examined the upper limb motion of oil palm harvesters to determine the effects of age and initial shoulder postures on their range of harvesting movements. Twenty male harvesters performed a manual push-pull-cutting technique (≥3 m fresh fruit branches (FFBs) height). The study was conducted by capturing the 1-D push-pull cutting technique harvesting movement via the Quintic system at the sagittal plane. The active range of harvesting movements during the harvesting phases and the range of the harvesting movement of the initial and maximum postures of their upper arms were calculated based on the kinematic data generated with the Quintic Biomechanics system (Version 29). Participants were divided into three groups based on their age, and two groups based on their initial support shoulder position, and dominant shoulder position. Data were analysed using the ANOVA and t-test. The joint movement angle pattern of the harvesters was classified into three phases: preparation, execution, and ending. The age-related variances for the initial and maximum support shoulder postures were determined. The range of harvesting movements and the active range of harvesting movements during the preparation phase at the support shoulder and wrist region were also observed. The initial support shoulder posture displayed a statistical variance in the maximum support and dominant range of harvesting movements of the shoulder. It was also linked to a reduced active range of harvesting movements for the support shoulder flexion and dominant wrist ulnar deviation at the preparation phase. Furthermore, the initial dominant shoulder exhibited a statistically significant difference for the dominant arm and a reduced active range of harvesting movements in the dominant wrist ulnar deviation at the preparation phase. This study produced important evidence about factors to be considered for the ergonomic design of harvesting tools and workplaces, especially within the oil palm industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Agriculture and Farm Safety · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Effects of Vibration on Health
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Malaysian oil palm workers are in pain: Hazards identification and ergonomics related problems
2. Ergonomics observation: Harvesting tasks at oil palm plantation10.1539/joh.13-0017-FS ↗
3. Ergonomic risk assessment on oil palm industry workers
4. Risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders among oil palm fruit harvesters during early harvesting stage10.5604/12321966.1152101 ↗
5. Design and Fabrication of prototype telescopic raising platform for harvesting oil palm fresh fruit bunches10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i17/71350 ↗
6. Multi-objective optimisation method for posture prediction and analysis with consideration of fatigue effect and its application case10.1016/j.cie.2009.06.003 ↗
7. Rahman, A., Mohamaddan, S., Majid, N.A.A., Munot, M.A., Yusuf, M., Ngie, D.C.S., and Deros, B.M. (2016, January 5–7). Investigation of human arm musculoskeletal model using aluminium pole in palm oil harvesting process. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.10.1109/IECBES.2016.7843480 ↗
8. Back pain and the observed factors among oil palm workers10.15282/ijets.5.2016.1.9.1048 ↗
9. Biomechanical and psychosocial work exposures and musculoskeletal symptoms among vineyard workers10.1539/joh.10-0031-OA ↗
10. Musculoskeletal symptoms in swedish dairy farmers
11. Musculoskeletal symptoms and workload in 12 branches of Dutch agriculture10.1080/00140139508925287 ↗
12. Agricultural injury in California migrant Hispanic farm workers10.1002/ajim.10272 ↗
13. Risk factors for back pain among male farmers: Analysis of Iowa farm family health and hazard surveillance study10.1002/ajim.10025 ↗
14. Back pain and agricultural work among farmers: An analysis of the Colorado farm family health and hazard surveillance survey10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199903)35:3<310::AID-AJIM12>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
15. Cross-sectional study of the relationship between repetitive work and the prevalence of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199908)36:2<248::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
16. A prospective study of computer users: II. Postural risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders10.1002/ajim.10067 ↗
17. Oil palm workers: Designing ergonomics harvesting tool using user centered design approach to reducing awkward body posture by Catia simulation
18. Validity test for simple ergonomics risk assessment (Sera)
19. Stature, age, and gender effects on reach motion postures10.1518/001872000779698222 ↗
20. A model for learning human reaching movements10.1007/s004220050378 ↗
21. On simulating human reach motions for ergonomics analyses10.1002/hfm.10018 ↗
22. Effects of Age, gender, and target location on seated reach capacity and posture10.1518/001872008X250719 ↗
23. Chaffin, D.B., Faraway, J., and Zhang, X. (1999). Simulating Reach Motions, SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-1916, SAE International.10.4271/1999-01-1916 ↗
24. Ergonomic of the manual harvesting tasks of oil-palm plantation in Indonesia based on anthropometric, postures and work motions analyses
25. Kroemer, K.H., and Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the Task to the Human, Taylor & Francis. [5th ed.].10.1201/9780367807337 ↗
26. Openshaw, S., and Taylor, E. (2006). Ergonomics and Design: A Refererence Guide, Allsteel Inc.
27. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S ↗
28. A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: Implications and recommendations for IS research
29. Reproducibility of surface EMG variables and peak torque during three sets of ten dynamic contractions10.1016/S1050-6411(99)00006-1 ↗
30. Shoulder pain and heavy manual labor10.1097/00003086-198412000-00022 ↗
31. Articles original in automobile work disorders and postural shoulder assembly10.5271/sjweh.544 ↗
32. Work related shoulder disorders: Quantitative exposure-response relations with reference to arm posture10.1136/oem.2003.010637 ↗
33. Work with prolonged arm elevation as a risk factor for shoulder pain: A longitudinal study among young adults10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.019 ↗
34. Postures, typing strategies, and gender differences in mobile device usage: An observational study10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.015 ↗
35. Measurement of angular wrist neutral zone and forearm muscle activity10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.004 ↗