Improving the Performance of Frequently Used Korean Handwritten Character Verification Based on Artificial Intelligence through Multimodal Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Handwriting verification is a biometric recognition field that identifies individuals’ unique characteristics contained in their handwriting. A single written character shows subtle differences depending on habits accumulated over time or the manner of writing. Based on this, it is often adopted in forensic investigations and as evidence in court. Existing handwriting verification is conducted by an expert, and is affected by the expert’s ability or subjectivity, causing different results to arise depending on the expert. Therefore, we propose a handwriting verification method that excludes human subjectivity and has objectivity. Using computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI), we derived results that excluded human subjectivity, and the judgment strength was expressed through a likelihood ratio. To improve the existing method’s accuracy, we performed a more accurate verification through multimodal use from the biometric field. Multimodal handwriting verification is conducted using up to four characters (not just one) because individual handwriting in each character is different. For learning, n-fold tests were conducted to maintain test objectivity, and the average performance of single character-based verification was 80.14% and the multimodal method averaged 88.96%. Here, we proposed the objectivity of handwriting verification through learning using AI, and show that performance improved through multimodal fusion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques · Biometric Identification and Security · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Artificial Intelligence & Informatics, Graduate School, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea
Department of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Individuality of handwriting10.1520/JFS15447J ↗
2. Dey, S., Dutta, A., Toledo, J.I., Ghosh, S.K., Lladós, J., and Pal, U. (2017). Signet: Convolutional Siamese network for writer independent offline signature verification. arXiv.
3. Author identification from handwritten characters using Siamese CNN
4. Jang, W., Kim, S., Kim, Y., and Lee, E.C. (2018). Automated verification method of Korean word handwriting using geometric feature. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-7605-3_213 ↗
5. Multimodal biometrics: An overview
6. Information fusion in biometrics10.1016/S0167-8655(03)00079-5 ↗
7. A survey on different levels of fusion in multimodal biometrics
8. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
9. Koch, G., Zemel, R., and Salakhutdinov, R. (2015, January 6–11). Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning Deep Learning Workshop, Lille, France.
10. Wang, H., Nie, F., and Huang, H. (2014, January 21–26). Robust distance metric learning via simultaneous l1-norm minimization and maximization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, China.
11. Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks
12. What is a support vector machine?10.1038/nbt1206-1565 ↗
13. Patle, A., and Chouhan, D.S. (2013, January 23–25). SVM kernel functions for classification. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Technology and Engineering (ICATE), Mumbai, India.10.1109/ICAdTE.2013.6524743 ↗
14. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection
15. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 ↗
16. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048 ↗