Treatment Option Criteria for Open Bite with Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis—A Retrospective Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) allow molar intrusion as an additional treatment option to conventional treatment for open bite cases. We investigated the treatment option criteria for open bite treatment. A total of 33 patients with skeletal Class I to Class II open bite who had stable occlusion one year after treatment were enrolled in the study, including 15 patients who had undergone surgical orthodontic treatment, 8 patients who had undergone treatment with molar intrusion, and 10 patients who had undergone treatment with anterior teeth extrusion. Pre-treatment cephalometric analysis of these patients was used for comparison. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to examine the measurement parameters that would be valid as treatment criteria. In the results, FMA showed that patients treated with molar intrusion had a moderately high angle, while those treated with surgical orthodontic treatment had a severe high angle. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve indicated that FMA is the most appropriate parameter for treatment option criteria. In addition, the cutoff value indicated that the borderline between molar intrusion and surgical orthodontic treatment was 37.5° for FMA. In this study, we suggested criteria for the treatment of open bite with molar intrusion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · dental development and anomalies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Kandamisaki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0061, Japan
Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, 5-11-13, Sugano, Ichikawa-shi, Chiba 272-8513, Japan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, 1-2-2, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 261-8502, Japan
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Long-Term Stability of Anterior Open-Bite Treatment by Intrusion of Maxillary Posterior Teeth10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.023 ↗
2. Orthodontic Treatment of Anterior Open Bite: A Review Article—Is Surgery Always Necessary?10.1007/s10006-013-0430-5 ↗
3. Stability of Treatment for Anterior Open-Bite Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.019 ↗
4. Long-Term Stability of Anterior Open Bite Extraction Treatment in the Permanent Dentition10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.006 ↗
5. Stability of Anterior Openbite Correction with Multiloop Edgewise Archwire Therapy: A Cephalometric Follow-up Study10.1067/mod.2000.104830 ↗
6. The Relevance Analysis of Hyoid Bone Position to Skeletal or Dental Openbite and Dentofacial Characteristics10.1016/j.oooo.2015.07.001 ↗
7. Long-Term Stability of Surgical Open-Bite Correction by Le Fort I Osteotomy
8. Anterior Open-Bite Malocclusion: A Longitudinal 10-Year Postretention Evaluation of Orthodontically Treated Patients10.1016/0002-9416(85)90038-7 ↗
9. Cephalometric Evaluation of Open Bite Treatment with NiTi Arch Wires and Anterior Elastics10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70189-7 ↗
10. Skeletal Anchorage System for Open-Bite Correction10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70345-8 ↗
11. Closing Anterior Open Bites by Intruding Molars with Titanium Miniplate Anchorage10.1067/mod.2002.128641 ↗
12. The Use of Skeletal Anchorage in Open Bite Treatment: A Cephalometric Evaluation
13. González Espinosa, D., de Oliveira Moreira, P.E., da Sousa, A.S., Flores-Mir, C., and Normando, D. (2020). Stability of Anterior Open Bite Treatment with Molar Intrusion Using Skeletal Anchorage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prog. Orthod., 21.10.1186/s40510-020-00328-2 ↗
14. Treatment and Posttreatment Dentoalveolar Changes Following Intrusion of Mandibular Molars with Application of a Skeletal Anchorage System (SAS) for Open Bite Correction
15. Skeletal and Dento-Alveolar Stability of Le Fort I Intrusion Osteotomies and Bimaxillary Osteotomies in Anterior Open Bite Deformities: A Retrospective Three-Centre Study10.1016/S0901-5027(97)80813-2 ↗
16. Treatment of Severe Anterior Open Bite with Skeletal Anchorage in Adults: Comparison with Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.046 ↗
17. Roentgeno-Cephalometric Analysis of Open Bite
18. Cephalometric Norms in Japanese Adults10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90849-7 ↗
19. Open-Bite: Diagnosis and Treatment10.1016/0002-9416(64)90175-7 ↗
20. Vertical Proportions and the Palatal Plane in Anterior Open-Bite10.1016/0002-9416(71)90100-X ↗
21. Molar Height and Dentoalveolar Compensation in Adult Subjects with Skeletal Open Bite10.2319/081910-488.1 ↗
22. Alsafadi, A.S., Alabdullah, M.M., Saltaji, H., Abdo, A., and Youssef, M. (2016). Effect of Molar Intrusion with Temporary Anchorage Devices in Patients with Anterior Open Bite: A Systematic Review. Prog. Orthod., 17.10.1186/s40510-016-0122-4 ↗
23. Outcomes and Stability in Patients with Anterior Open Bite and Long Anterior Face Height Treated with Temporary Anchorage Devices and a Maxillary Intrusion Splint10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.020 ↗
24. Surgical-Orthodontic Collection of Openbite Deformity10.1016/0002-9416(77)90188-9 ↗
25. The Relationship between Vertical Facial Morphology and Overjet in Untreated Class II Subjects10.2319/050711-322.1 ↗
26. Determination of Class II and Class III Skeletal Patterns: Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis on Various Cephalometric Measurements10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70265-3 ↗
27. Cephalometrics of Anterior Open Bite: A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis10.1016/0889-5406(92)70092-O ↗
28. Comparison of Cephalometric Norms between Japanese and Caucasian Adults in Antero-Posterior and Vertical Dimension10.1093/ejo/cjm059 ↗
29. Severe Anterior Open-Bite Case Treated Using Titanium Screw Anchorage
30. Akbaydogan, L.C., and Akin, M. (2021). Cephalometric Evaluation of Intrusion of Maxillary Posterior Teeth by Miniscrews in the Treatment of Open Bite. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., in press.10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.11.033 ↗