journal article·2021-09-17Open access

Scheduling Period Selection Based on Stability Analysis for Engagement Control Task of Automatic Clutches

Zhao Ding, Li Chen, Jun Chen, Xiaoxuan Cheng, Chengliang Yin

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 18

Abstract

The clutch engagement process involves three phases known as open, slipping, and locked and takes a few seconds. The engagement control program runs in an embedded control unit, in which discretization may induce oscillation and even instability in the powertrain due to an improper scheduling period for the engagement control task. To properly select the scheduling period, a methodology for control–scheduling co-design during clutch engagement is proposed. Considering the transition of the friction state from slipping to being locked, the co-design framework consists of two steps. In the first step, a stability analysis is conducted for the slipping phase based on a linearized system model enveloping the driving and driven part of the clutch, feed-forward and feedback control loop together with a zero-order signal hold element. The critical period is determined according to pole locations, and factors influencing the critical period are investigated. In the second step, real-time hardware-in-the-loop experiments are carried out to inspect the dynamic response concerning the friction state transition. A sub-boundary within the stable region is found to guarantee the control performance to satisfy the engineering requirements. In general, the vehicle jerk and clutch frictional loss increase with the increase in the scheduling period. When the scheduling period is shorter than the critical period, the rate of increase is mild. However, once the scheduling period exceeds the critical period, the rate of increase becomes very high.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

National Laboratory of Automotive Electronic Control Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimal energy management for a series–parallel hybrid electric bus10.1016/j.enconman.2009.03.015 ↗
2. Economical launching and accelerating control strategy for a single-shaft parallel hybrid electric bus
3. Torque Transmissibility Assessment for Automotive Dry-Clutch Engagement10.1109/TMECH.2010.2047509 ↗
4. Stability and response of a self-amplified braking system under velocity-dependent actuation force10.1007/s11071-014-1603-y ↗
5. Design and validation of clutch-to-clutch shift actuator using dual-wedge mechanism10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.01.004 ↗
6. Improved clutch slip control for automated transmissions10.1177/0954406217734578 ↗
7. Experimental study on improvement in the shift quality for an automatic transmission using a motor-driven wedge clutch10.1177/0954407013514397 ↗
8. Fuzzy Approximation-Based Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Uncertain State Constrained Systems with Time-Varying Delays10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2919490 ↗
9. An Adaptive Control Scheme for Flexible Power Point Tracking in Photovoltaic Systems10.1109/TPEL.2018.2869172 ↗
10. LFT-Structured Uncertainty State-Space Modeling for State Feedback Robust Control of the Ultra-Precision Wafer Stage10.1109/TIE.2019.2903779 ↗
11. Parameter Identification and Model-Based Nonlinear Robust Control of Fluidic Soft Bending Actuators10.1109/TMECH.2019.2909099 ↗
12. A further refinement of discretized Lyapunov functional method for the stability of time-delay systems10.1080/00207170110047190 ↗
13. ZOH Discretization Effect on Higher-Order Sliding-Mode Control Systems10.1109/TIE.2008.2005139 ↗
14. Effect of discretization on dynamical behavior of SEIR and SIR models with nonlinear incidence10.1016/j.aml.2014.08.012 ↗
15. Parameter Selection for Real-Time Controllers in Resource-Constrained Systems10.1109/TII.2010.2053378 ↗
16. Optimal reward-based scheduling of periodic real-time tasks
17. Control-schedule co-design for fast stabilization in real time systems facing repeated reconfigurations10.1007/s10617-019-09221-6 ↗
18. Hybrid Scheduling and Quantized Output Feedback Control for Networked Control Systems10.1007/s12555-016-0479-7 ↗
19. Scheduling-and-Control Codesign for a Collection of Networked Control Systems with Uncertain Delays10.1109/TCST.2008.2010459 ↗
20. Optimal Online Sampling Period Assignment: Theory and Experiments10.1109/TCST.2010.2053205 ↗
21. Min, Z., Jin, W., and Ma, A. (2016, January 12–14). Co-design of optimal feedback scheduling strategy and fault detection for networked control systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (CGNCC), Nanjing, China.
22. Yun, N., Liang, Y., and Yang, H. (2017, January 10–14). Event-triggered robust control and dynamic scheduling co-design for networked control system. Proceedings of the 2017 14th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan.10.1109/IBCAST.2017.7868059 ↗
23. Hybrid event-time-triggered networked control systems: Scheduling-event-control co-design10.1016/j.ins.2015.01.013 ↗
24. ArnellP, R.D., Davies, B., Halling, J., and Whomes, T.L. (1991). Tribology: Principles and Design Applications, Springer. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-1-349-21387-0 ↗
25. Torque Coordination Control During Mode Transition for a Series–Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle10.1109/TVT.2012.2200305 ↗
26. Hierarchical Control of Dry Clutch for Engine-Start Process in a Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle10.1109/TTE.2016.2535316 ↗
27. System dynamic modelling and adaptive optimal control for automatic clutch engagement of vehicles10.1243/095440702762508236 ↗
28. Model reference self-learning fuzzy control method for automated mechanical clutch10.1007/s00170-016-9308-7 ↗
29. Dorf, C.R., and Bishop, R. (1994). Modern Control Systems, Pearson Prentice Hall. [7th ed.].
30. Seto, D., Lehoczky, J.P., Sha, L., and Shin, K.G. (1996, January 4–6). On task schedulability in real-time control systems. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, Washington, WA, USA.
31. Bini, E., and Natale, M.D. (2005, January 5–8). Optimal Task Rate Selection in Fixed Priority Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium, Miami, FL, USA.
32. Balbastre, P., Ripoll, I., and Crespo, A. (2006, January 5–7). Optimal deadline assignment for periodic real-time tasks in dynamic priority systems. Proceedings of the Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, Dresden, Germany.
33. Hoang, H., Buttazzo, G., Jonsson, M., and Karlsson, S. (2006, January 16–18). Computing the Minimum EDF Feasible Deadline in Periodic Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications, Sydney, Australia.
34. Real-Time Scheduling of PI Control Tasks10.1109/TCST.2015.2464304 ↗