Acoustic, Myoelectric, and Aerodynamic Parameters of Euphonic and Dysphonic Voices: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: At present, there is no clinical consensus on the concept of normal and dysphonic voices. For many years, the establishment of a consensus on the terminology related to normal and pathological voices has been studied, in order to facilitate the communication between professionals in the field of the voice. Aim: systematically review the literature to compare and learn more precisely the measurable and objective characteristics of the acoustic, aerodynamic and surface electromyographic parameters of the normal and dysphonic voices. Methods: The PRISMA 2020 methodology was used as a review protocol together with the PICO procedure to answer the research question through six databases. Results: In total, 467 articles were found. After duplicate records were removed from the selection, the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and 19 articles were eligible. A qualitative synthesis of the included studies is presented in terms of their methodology and results. Conclusions: Studying the acoustic, aerodynamic, and electromyographic parameters with more precision, in both normal and dysphonic voices, will allow health professionals working in the field of voice (speech therapy, otorhinolaryngology, phoniatrics, etc.) to establish a diagnostic and detailed consensus of the vocal pathology, enhancing the communication and generalization of results worldwide.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Voice and Speech Disorders · Dysphagia Assessment and Management · Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Basic Psychology, Speech Therapy University Clinic, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain
Department of Stomatology, Dental University Clinic, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain
Department of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Casa de la Salud Hospital, 46021 Valencia, Spain
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. The 2016 G. Paul Moore Lecture. Lessons in Voice Rehabilitation: Journal of Voice and Clinical Practice10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.020 ↗
2. Saggio, G., and Costantini, G. (2020). Worldwide Healthy Adult Voice Baseline Parameters: A Comprehensive Review. J. Voice, in press.
3. The effect of perceptual training on ability to use the vocal profile analysis scheme10.3109/13682829809179444 ↗
4. Jackson-Menaldi, M.C. (2019). Aspectos generales para tener en cuenta en la evaluación de la voz y organización del laboratorio de voz. La voz Normal y Patológica, Médica Panamericana.
5. Quick Screen for Voice and Supplementary Documents for Identifying Pediatric Voice Disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools10.1044/0161-1461(2004/030 ↗
6. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.009 ↗
7. Assessing voice health using smartphones: Bias and random error of acoustic voice parameters captured by different smartphone types10.1111/1460-6984.12457 ↗
8. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
9. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration10.1136/bmj.b2700 ↗
10. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013 ↗
11. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports10.1136/bmjebm-2017-110853 ↗
12. Estudio objetivo de la voz en población normal y en la disfonía por nódulos y pólipos vocales10.1016/S0001-6519(01)78239-8 ↗
13. Reliability and applicability of aerodynamic measures in dysphonia assessment10.1080/02699200410001703592 ↗
14. Multiparametric Evaluation of Dysphonic Severity10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.007 ↗
15. Pathological assessment of patients speech signals using nonlinear dynamical analysis10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.10.011 ↗
16. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Patients with Vocal Fold Polyp10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.04.002 ↗
17. Assessment of dysphonia due to benign vocal fold lesions by acoustic and aerodynamic indices: A multivariate analysis10.3109/14015439.2010.528022 ↗
18. Laryngeal Aerodynamic Analysis in Assisting With the Diagnosis of Muscle Tension Dysphonia10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.12.001 ↗
19. Electrical Activity of Extrinsic Laryngeal Muscles in Subjects With and Without Dysphonia10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.012 ↗
20. Voice data mining for laryngeal pathology assessment10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.07.026 ↗
21. Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.013 ↗
22. Aerodynamic Patterns in Patients with Voice Disorders: A Retrospective Study10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.001 ↗
23. Spectral Analysis of Speech Signal Characteristics: A Comparison between Healthy Controls and Laryngeal Disorder10.1007/978-981-10-5520-1_31 ↗
24. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.008 ↗
25. Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls
26. Aerodynamic and acoustic voice measurements of patients with vocal nodules: Variation in baseline and changes across voice therapy10.1067/S0892-1997(03)00076-6 ↗
27. The relationship between subjective self-rating and objective voice assessment measures10.3109/14015430903582128 ↗
28. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.08.015 ↗
29. Aerodynamic and Acoustic Features of Vocal Effort10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.007 ↗
30. Relationship between Subglottal Pressure and Sound Pressure Level in Untrained Voices10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.006 ↗
31. Aging Effect on Korean Female Voice: Acoustic and Perceptual Examinations of Breathiness10.1159/000445290 ↗
32. The effects of age and gender on laryngeal aerodynamics
33. Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009 ↗