journal article·2021-09-03Open access

Evaluation of the Simultaneous Operation of the Mechanisms for Cross-Border Interchange and Activation of the Regulating Reserves

Marcel Topler, Boštjan Polajžer

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 17

Abstract

This article examines the mechanisms for cross-border interchange of the regulating reserves (RRs), i.e., the imbalance-netting process (INP) and the cross-border activation of the RRs (CBRR). Both mechanisms are an additional service of frequency restoration reserves in the power system and connect different control areas (CAs) via virtual tie-lines to release RRs and reduce balancing energy. The primary objective of the INP is to net the demand for RRs between the cooperating CAs with different signs of interchange power variation. In contrast, the primary objective of the CBRR is to activate the RRs in the cooperating CAs with matching signs of interchange power variation. In this way, the ancillary services market and the European balancing system should be improved. However, both the INP and CBRR include a frequency term and thus impact the frequency response of the cooperating CAs. Therefore, the impact of the simultaneous operation of the INP and CBRR on the load-frequency control (LFC) and performance is comprehensively evaluated with dynamic simulations of a three-CA testing system, which no previous studies investigated before. In addition, a function for correction power adjustment is proposed to prevent the undesirable simultaneous activation of the INP and CBRR. In this way, area control error (ACE) and scheduled control power are decreased since undesired correction is prevented. The dynamic simulations confirmed that the simultaneous operation of the INP and CBRR reduced the balancing energy and decreased the unintended exchange of energy. Consequently, the LFC and performance were improved in this way. However, the impact of the INP and CBRR on the frequency quality has no unambiguous conclusions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Frequency Control in Power Systems · Power System Optimization and Stability · HVDC Systems and Fault Protection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. EUR-Lex (2021, July 15). Establishing a Guideline on Electricity Transmission System Operation. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1485. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/1485/oj.
2. EUR-Lex (2021, July 15). Establishing a Guideline on Electricity Balancing. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/2195/oj.
3. ENTSO-E (2020). Proposal for the Implementation Framework for a European Platform for the Exchange of Balancing Energy from Frequency Restoration Reserves, ENTSO-E.
4. ENTSO-E (2020). IGCC Regular Report on Social Welfare, ENTSO-E.
5. Zolotarev, P., Gökeler, M., Kuring, M., Neumann, H., and Kurscheid, E.M. (2012, January 26–30). Grid Control Cooperation—A Framework for Technical and Economical Crossborder Optimization for Load-Frequency Control. Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric Systems (Cigre’12), Paris, France.
6. Pawalek, A., and Hofmann, L. (2019, January 23–27). Utilization of HVDC-Systems in the International Grid Control Cooperation. Proceedings of the IEEE Milan PowerTech 2019, Milan, Italy.10.1109/PTC.2019.8810806 ↗
7. Pawalek, A., and Hofmann, L. (2018, January 12–14). Comparison of Methods for the Simulation of Dynamic Power Flows in the International Grid Control Cooperation. Proceedings of the IEEE Electronic Power Grid (eGrid) 2018, Charleston, SC, USA.10.1109/eGRID.2018.8598698 ↗
8. Cronenberg, A., Sager, N., and Willemsen, S. (2016, January 4–8). Integration of France Into the International Grid Control Cooperation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Energy Conference 2016 (ENERGYCON’16, Leuven, Belgium.10.1109/ENERGYCON.2016.7514085 ↗
9. ENTSO-E (2020). Stakeholder Document for the Principles of IGCC, ENTSO-E.
10. ENTSO-E (2013). Supporting Document for the Network Code on Load-Frequency Control and Reserves, ENTSO-E.
11. Zolotarev, P. (2017, January 6–9). Social Welfare of Balancing Markets. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) 2017, Dresden, Germany.10.1109/EEM.2017.7981968 ↗
12. Avramiotis, F.I., Margelou, S., and Zima, M. (2018, January 27–29). Investigations on a Fair TSO-TSO Settlement for the Imbalance Netting Process in European Power System. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM) 2018, Lodz, Poland.
13. A Simple Method for Improving Control Area Performance: Area Control Error (ACE) Diversity Interchange ADI10.1109/59.387953 ↗
14. Zhou, N., Etingov, P.V., Makarov, J.V., Guttromson, R.T., and McManus, B. (2010, January 19–22). Improving Area Control Error Diversity Interchange (ADI) Program by Incorporating Congestion Constraints. Proceedings of the IEEE PES T&D 2010, New Orleans, LA, USA.
15. Apostolopoulou, D., Sauer, P.W., and Dominguez-Garcia, A.D. (2015, January 26–30). Balancing Authority Area Coordination with Limited Exchange of Information. Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2015, Denver, CO, USA.10.1109/PESGM.2015.7286133 ↗
16. ENTSO-E (2020). Anual Report 2019 Edition, ENTSO-E.
17. EXPLORE (2021, July 15). Target Model for Exchange of Frequency Restoration Reserves. Available online: https://www.tennet.eu/news/detail/explore-target-model-for-exchange-of-frequency-restoration-reserves/.
18. ENTSO-E (2012). Consultation on the Design of the Platform for Automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve (AFRR) of PICASSO Region, ENTSO-E.
19. Gebrekiros, T.Y. (2015). Analysis of Integrated Balancing Markets in Northern Europe under Different Market Design Options, NTNU.
20. Topler, M., and Polajžer, B. (2019, January 11–14). Impact of Imbalance Netting Cooperation on Frequency Quality and Provision of Load-Frequency Control. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering 2019 and IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe) 2019, Genoa, Italy.10.1109/EEEIC.2019.8783613 ↗
21. Topler, M., Ritonja, J., and Polajžer, B. (2019). The Impact of the Imbalance Netting Process on Power System Dynamics. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12244733 ↗
22. Topler, M., and Polajžer, B. (2020, January 9–12). Evaluation of the Cross-Border Activation of the Regulating Reserve with Dynamic Simulations. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering 2020 and IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe) 2020, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope49358.2020.9160647 ↗
23. Improving the Cross-Border Activation of the Regulating Reserve to Enhance the Provision of Load-Frequency Control10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024830 ↗
24. Influencing Factors of Cross-Border E-Commerce Consumer Purchase Intention Based on Wireless Network and Machine Learning10.1155/2021/9984213 ↗
25. Imani, M., and Ghoreishi, S.F. (2021). Graph-Based Bayesian Optimization for Large-Scale Objective-Based Experimental Design. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 1–13.10.23919/ACC45564.2020.9147824 ↗
26. Regulating for a Digital Economy—Understanding the Importance of Cross-Border Data Flows in Asia
27. ENTSO-E (2012). Operational Reserve Ad Hoc Team Report, ENTSO-E.
28. Bevrani, H. (2009). Robust Power System Frequency Control, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84878-5 ↗
29. Kundur, P. (1994). Power System Stability and Control, McGraw-Hill.
30. NERC (2012). Frequency Response Standard, Background Document, NERC.
31. ENTSO-E (2017). Rate of Change of Frequency (ROCOF) Withstand Capability, ENTSO-E.
32. ACER (2018). Benefits from Balancing Market Integration (Imbalance Netting and Exchange of Balancing Energy), ACER.
33. A Low-Order System Frequency Response Model10.1109/59.65898 ↗
34. Optimum Mmegawatt-Frequency Control of Multiarea Electric Energy Systems10.1109/TPAS.1970.292602 ↗
35. Deadbands, Droop, and Inertia Impact on Power System Frequency Distribution10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2895547 ↗
36. Definition and Classification of Power System Stability IEEE/CIGRE Joint Task Force on Stability Terms and Definitions10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825981 ↗
37. Janecek, E., Cerny, V., Fialova, A., and Fantík, J. (November, January 29). A New Approach to Modelling of Electricity Transmission System Operation. Proceedings of the IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition 2006, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/PSCE.2006.296511 ↗