journal article·2021-08-27Open access

Dosimetric Evaluation in Micro-CT Studies Used in Preclinical Molecular Imaging

Alexis N. Rueda, César Ruiz-Trejo, Eduardo López-Pineda, Mario E. Romero-Piña, Luis A. Medina

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 17

Abstract

In microCT imaging, there is a close relationship between the dose of radiation absorbed by animals and the image quality, or spatial resolution. Although the radiation levels used in these systems are generally non-lethal, they can induce cellular or molecular alterations that affect the experimental results. Here, we describe a dosimetric characterization of the different image acquisition modalities used by the microCT unit of the Albira microPET/SPECT/CT scanner, which is a widely used multimodal imaging system in preclinical research. The imparted dose at the animal surface (IDS) was estimated based on Boone’s polynomial interpolation method and experimental measurements using an ionization chamber and thermoluminescent dosimeters. The results indicated that the imparted dose at surface level delivered to the mice was in the 30 to 300 mGy range. For any combination of current (0.2 or 0.4 mA) and voltage (35 or 45 kV), in the Standard, Good, and Best image acquisition modalities, the dose imparted at surface level in rodents was below its threshold of deterministic effects (250 mGy); however, the High Res modality was above that threshold.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico

Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, INCan/UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, Mexico

Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico

Funding

Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Parametrization of X-ray spectra appropiate for microCT scanners10.1016/j.nima.2009.10.150 ↗
2. Bushberg, J.T., Seibert, J.A., Leidholdt, E.M., and Boone, J.M. (2012). The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [3rd ed.].
3. X-ray computed tomography with 50-µm resolution10.1364/AO.24.004117 ↗
4. Stock, S.R. (2019). MicroComputed Tomography: Methodology and Applications, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9780429186745 ↗
5. Fundamental image quality limits for microcomputed tomography in small animals10.1118/1.1617353 ↗
6. Micro-CT for anatomic referencing in PET and SPECT: Radiation dose, biologic damage, and image quality10.2967/jnumed.111.089151 ↗
7. Small-animal X-ray dose from micro-CT10.1162/1535350042380326 ↗
8. X-ray Production, Interaction, and Detection in Diagnostic Imaging
9. An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode X-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV10.1118/1.597953 ↗
10. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography10.1118/1.598100 ↗
11. Carrilero-López, V. Personal communication.
12. ALBIRA: A small animal PET/SPECT/CT imaging system
13. (2021, June 13). Apogee Tube, W Anode. Available online: http://www.fisica.unam.mx/~brandan/spectra/AW.pdf.
14. Hubbell, J.H., and Seltzer, S.M. (1995). Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients, NIST Standard Reference Database 126.
15. Burden, R.L., Faires, J.D., and Burden, A.M. (2010). Numerical Analysis, Cengage Learning. [9th ed.].
16. Measurement of the mass energy-absorption coefficient of air for X-rays in the range from 3 to 60 keV10.1088/0031-9155/57/24/8231 ↗
17. Charles, C. (1983). The Physics of Radiology, Thomas. [4th ed.].
18. Gardner, J.L. (2005). Uncertainties in Photometric Integrals, NMI. NMI Technical Report 9.
19. Woolliams, E.R. (2013). Determining the Uncertainty Associated with Integrals of Spectral Quantities, European Association of National Metrology Institutes.
20. Bergman, R., Paget, M.L., and Richman, E.E. (2011). CALiPER Exploratory Study: Accounting for Uncertainty in Lumen Measurements, No. PNNL-20320.10.2172/1018153 ↗
21. LiF: Mg, Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20–250 kVp relative to Co6010.1118/1.2898137 ↗
22. López-Pineda, E. Personal communication.
23. Experimental and mathematical modeling of half-value layer measurements for x-ray equipment10.4015/S1016237216500198 ↗
24. ISO 4037: 2019 validation of radiation qualities by means of half-value layer and Hp (10) dosimetry10.1093/rpd/ncz185 ↗
25. On the measurement of half-value layer in film–screen mammography10.1118/1.596444 ↗
26. International Atomic Energy Agency (2011). Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography: International Atomic Energy Agency Human Health Series No. 17, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
27. Attix, F.H. (1986). Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry, John Wiley & Sons. [1st ed.].10.1002/9783527617135 ↗
28. McGregor, D.S., and Shultis, J.K. (2020). Radiation Detection: Concepts, Methods, and Devices, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781439819401 ↗
29. Dosimetry concepts for scanner quality assurance and tissue dose assessment in micro-CT10.1118/1.3675400 ↗
30. Small Animal Absorbed Radiation Dose from Serial Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging10.1007/s11307-007-0080-9 ↗
31. Dosimetry in Micro-computed Tomography: A Review of the Measurement Methods, Impacts, and Characterization of the Quantum GX Imaging System10.1007/s11307-016-1026-x ↗
32. Monte Carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom10.1118/1.2148333 ↗
33. CT Dose Index and Patient Dose: They Are Not the Same Thing10.1148/radiol.11101800 ↗
34. Quantitative observations on recovery from whole body irradiation in mice. I. Recovery after single large doses of radiation10.1259/0007-1285-29-346-563 ↗
35. Radiation Mortality in the Mouse: Model of the Kinetics of Injury Accumulation: I. Protracted Doses in the 30-Day Lethal Range10.2307/3571353 ↗