Cyclic Tests and Numerical Analyses on Bolt-Connected Precast Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
A bolt-connected precast reinforced concrete deep beam (RDB) is proposed as a lateral resisting component that can be used in frame structures to resist seismic loads. RDB can be installed in the steel frame by connecting to the frame beam with only high-strength bolts, which is different from the commonly used cast-in-place RC walls. Two 1/3 scaled specimens with different height-to-length ratios were tested to obtain their seismic performance. The finite element method is used to model the seismic behavior of the test specimens, and parametric analyses are conducted to study the effect on the height-to-length ratio, the strength of the concrete and the height-to-thickness ratio of RDBs. The experimental and numerical results show that the RDB with a low height-to-length ratio exhibited a shear–bending failure mode, while the RDB with a high height-to-length ratio failed with a shear-dominated failure mode. By comparing the RDB with a height-to-length ratio of 2.0, the ultimate capacity, initial stiffness and ductility of the RDB with a height-to-length ratio of 0.75 increased by 277%, 429% and 141%, respectively. It was found that the seismic performance of frame structures could be effectively adjusted by changing the height-to-length ratio and length-to-thickness of the RDB. The RDB is a desirable lateral-resisting component for existing and new frame buildings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Cyclic behavior of steel frame structures with composite reinforced concrete infill walls and partially-restrained connections10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.10.002 ↗
2. Behavior, design, and modeling of structural walls and coupling beams—Lessons from recent laboratory tests and earthquakes10.1007/s40069-012-0001-4 ↗
3. Xu, W., Yang, X., and Wang, F. (2018). Experimental investigation on the seismic behavior of newly-developed precast reinforced concrete block masonry shear walls. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071071 ↗
4. Sun, L., Guo, H., and Liu, Y. (2019). Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Steel Frames with Infilled Recycled Aggregate Concrete Shear Walls. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9214723 ↗
5. Cyclic shear test on a dowel beam-to-column connection of precast buildings10.12989/eas.2015.9.3.541 ↗
6. Shake-Table Response of a Coupled RC Wall with Thin T-Shaped Piers10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001718 ↗
7. Cyclic tensile testing of a three-way panel connection for precast wall-slab-wall structures10.1002/suco.201800280 ↗
8. Experimental seismic performance of steel- and composite steel-panel wall strengthened steel frames10.1016/j.acme.2016.11.007 ↗
9. Experimental study on separating reinforced concrete infill walls from steel moment frames10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.004 ↗
10. Gribniak, V., Misiūnaitė, I., Rimkus, A., Sokolov, A., and Šapalas, A. (2019). Deformations of FRP–Concrete Composite Beam: Experiment and Numerical Analysis. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9235164 ↗
11. Salih, R., Zhou, F., Abbas, N., and Mastoi, A.K. (2020). Experimental Investigation of Reinforced Concrete Beam with Openings Strengthened Using FRP Sheets under Cyclic Load. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13143127 ↗
12. Infilled Walls for Earthquake Strengthening10.1061/JSDEAG.0005093 ↗
13. Horii, H., Kabele, P., and Takeuchi, S. (1998). On the Prediction Method for the Structural Performance of Repaired/Retrofitted Structures, Fracture Mechanics in Concrete Structures: Proceedings of FRAMCOS-3, AEDIFICATIO Publishers.
14. Investigation of infill panels made from engineered cementitious composites for seismic strengthening and retrofit10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1712) ↗
15. An experimental study on structural performance of RC frame with non-structural slit wall-part 1 result of test
16. Behavior of framed modular building system with double skin steel panels10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.002 ↗
17. Experimental investigation of composite steel plate deep beam infill steel frame10.1007/s13296-014-3005-x ↗
18. Effects of configuration parameters on seismic performance of steel frames equipped with composite steel panel wall10.1002/tal.1542 ↗
19. Seismic life-cycle cost assessment of steel frames equipped with steel panel walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110399 ↗
20. Macroscopic modelling of steel frames equipped with bolt-connected reinforced concrete panel wall10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110549 ↗
21. Cyclic loading tests for precast concrete cantilever walls with C-type connections10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.753 ↗
22. Precast reinforced concrete shear walls: State of the art review10.1002/suco.201800129 ↗
23. Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in RC precast building10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.002 ↗
24. Behavior of steel–concrete composite bolted connector in precast reinforced concrete shear wall10.1177/1369433219846957 ↗
25. In-plane cyclic testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted metal duct base connections10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.079 ↗
26. Structural shear performance of insulated precast concrete sandwich panels with steel plate connectors10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110691 ↗
27. (2002). GB/T 50081—Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete, Chinese Architecture & Building Press.
28. (1997). JGJ 101—Specification of Testing Methods for Earthquake Resistant Building, Chinese Architecture & Building Press.
29. Mansour, M., El-Ariss, B., and El-Maaddawy, T. (2020). Effect of Support Conditions on Performance of Continuous Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams. Buildings, 10.10.3390/buildings10110212 ↗