The Optimization Analysis for the Original and Manipulation Identification of Illegally Filmed Images
Source abstract
Abstract
Illegally filmed images, the sharing of non-consensually filmed images over social media, and the secret recording and distribution of celebrity images are increasing. To catch distributors of illegally filmed images, many investigation techniques based on an analysis of the file attribute information of the original images have been introduced. As forensic science advances, various types of anti-forensic technologies are being produced, requiring investigators to open and analyze all videos from the suspect’s storage devices, raising the question of the invasion of privacy during the investigation. The suspect can even file a lawsuit, which makes issuing a warrant and conducting an investigation difficult. Thus, it is necessary to detect the original and manipulated images without needing to directly go through multiple videos. We propose an optimization analysis and detection method for extracting original and manipulated images from seized devices of suspects. In addition, to increase the detection rate of both original and manipulated images, we suggest a precise measurement approach for comparative thresholds. Thus, the proposed method is a new digital forensic methodology for comparing and identifying original and manipulated images accurately without the need for opening videos individually in a suspect’s mobile device.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Media Forensic Detection · Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques · Digital and Cyber Forensics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, Kyonggi University, Suwon-si 16227, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Pornography of place: Location, leaks and obscenity in the Indian MMS porn video10.1080/14746689.2017.1351089 ↗
2. Beyond ‘Revenge Porn’: The Continuum of Image Based Sexual Abuse10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2 ↗
3. Private, Hidden and Obscured: Image-Based Sexual Abuse in Singapore10.1007/s11417-019-09293-0 ↗
4. Silvia, S., and Lucia, B. (2020). The Use of Telegram for NonConsensual Dissemination of Intimate Images: Gendered Affordances and the Construction of Masculinities. Soc. Media Soc.
5. Zorloni, L. (2019, January 23). Uscite Le Minorenni. Wired. Available online: https://www.wired.it/internet/web/2019/01/23/telegram-chat-stupro-virtuale-minori-stalking-revenge-porn.
6. Revenge Porn Victimization of College Students in the United States: An Exploratory Analysis
7. Hash-based carving: Searching media for complete files and file fragments with sector hashing and hashdb10.1016/j.diin.2015.05.001 ↗
8. Distinct Sector Hashes for Target File Detection10.1109/MC.2012.327 ↗
9. Gandeva, B.S., Philip, T.D., and Muhammad, A.N. (2016, January 12). Digital forensic analysis of Telegram Messenger on Android devices. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Systems (ICTS), Surabaya, Indonesia.
10. An Empirical Analysis of Disk Sector Hashes for Data Carving10.1080/15567280802050436 ↗
11. Content-Based Video Copy Detection—A Survey
12. Indyk, P., Iyengar, G., and Shivakumar, N. (1999). Finding Pirated Video Sequences on the Internet, Computer Science Department, Stanford University. Technical Report.
13. A review on robust video copy detection10.1007/s13735-018-0159-x ↗
14. Forensic source identification using JPEG image headers: The case of smartphones10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.016 ↗
15. Image origin classification based on social network provenance10.1109/TIFS.2017.2656842 ↗
16. Castiglione, A., Cattaneo, G., and Alfredo, D.S. (December, January 30). A forensic analysis of images on online social networks. Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, Fukuoka, Japan.10.1109/INCoS.2011.17 ↗
17. Digital image authentication from jpeg headers10.1109/TIFS.2011.2128309 ↗
18. Adjeroh, D.A., Lee, M.C., and King, I. (1998, January 5–7). A Distance Measure for Video Sequence Similarity Matching. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multi-Media Database Management Systems, Dayton, OH, USA.
19. Anil, K.J., Aditya, V., and Xiong, W. (1998, January 20). Query by video clip. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Multimedia Systems, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
20. Gengembre, N., and Berrani, S.-A. (2008). The Orange Labs Real Time Video Copy Detection System—TrecVid 2008 Results, Orange Labs—Division R&D Technologies 4.
21. Optimal Sampling Strategies in Quicksort and Quickselect
22. Exposing video inter-frame forgery via histogram of oriented gradients and motion energy image10.1007/s11045-020-00711-6 ↗
23. Scene image classification using locality-constrained linear coding based on histogram intersection10.1007/s11042-017-4830-7 ↗
24. A novel learning-based dissimilarity metric for rigid and non-rigid medical image registration by using Bhattacharyya Distances10.1016/j.patcog.2016.09.004 ↗