journal article·2021-04-27Open access

The Rate of Correctly Planned Size of Digital Templating in Two Planes—A Comparative Study of a Short-Stem Total Hip Implant with Primary Metaphyseal Fixation and a Conventional Stem

Johanna K. Buschatzky, Michael Schwarze, Nils Wirries, Gabriela von Lewinski, Henning Windhagen, Thilo Floerkemeier, Stefan Budde

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 9

Abstract

(1) Background: Preoperative templating is mainly conducted on an anteroposterior pelvic overview X-ray. For short stem hip arthroplasty, the choice of the optimal size is especially crucial to avoid complications. Thus, the study aimed to determine if there is an increased rate of correctly planned sizes using two radiological planes. (2) Methods: 50 patients with a conventional stem and 100 with a short stem total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Without knowing the implanted size, three independent orthopedic surgeons performed digital templating: once using the anteroposterior pelvic overview only and once using the lateral view in addition. (3) Results: The rate of correctly planned sizes (+/−1 size compared to the inserted size) of templating with one plane was 86.3% ± 9.5% in short stem hip arthroplasty and 88.4% ± 6.0% in conventional stem arthroplasty. By adding the lateral view, the rate of correctly planned sizes was 89.9% ± 12.0% for the short stem hip arthroplasty group and 89.4% ± 9.8% for the conventional group (p > 0.1). (4) A potential positive effect of preoperative templating using an additional lateral X-ray view for short stem implants may be suggested based on the results of this study, which did, however, not reach statistical significance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Diakovere Annastift, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Laboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Göttingen Medical School, 37075 Göttingen, Germany

Go:h Gelenkchirurgie Orthopädie, 30159 Hannover, Germany

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Precision of preoperative digital templating in total hip arthroplasty
2. The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70074-2 ↗
3. Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: Classification and preoperative planning
4. Muller, M.E. (1992). Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 12–21.10.1097/00003086-199201000-00004 ↗
5. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty10.2106/00004623-200412002-00016 ↗
6. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty10.5435/00124635-200511000-00005 ↗
7. Digital comparison of planned and implanted stem position in total hip replacement using a program form migration analysis10.1007/s00402-010-1256-3 ↗
8. Femoral offset: Anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010 ↗
9. Hip abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty with short stems10.1007/s00402-011-1350-1 ↗
10. Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty10.1080/00016470410001708070 ↗
11. The accuracy of digital templating: A comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty10.1007/s00264-012-1532-7 ↗
12. Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: A randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.013 ↗
13. The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.011 ↗
14. Is computerised 3D templating more accurate than 2D templating to predict size of components in primary total hip arthroplasty?10.1177/1120700018776311 ↗
15. R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: http://www.R-project.org.
16. Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 ↗
17. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data10.2307/2529310 ↗
18. Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study10.1007/s00264-011-1361-0 ↗
19. Clinical results of the metha short hip stem: A perspective for younger patients?
20. A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: Is digital templating accurate and safe?10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.019 ↗
21. A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study10.1302/0301-620X.82B7.0820952 ↗
22. A new digital preoperative planning method for total hip arthroplasties10.1007/s11999-008-0486-y ↗
23. Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty10.3928/01477447-20120123-15 ↗
24. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem10.1007/s00402-007-0494-5 ↗
25. Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs10.1007/s00402-008-0676-9 ↗
26. Two-year results of a modular short hip stem prosthesis—A prospective study10.1055/s-0029-1185899 ↗
27. 10-year experience with short stem total hip arthroplasty
28. Accuracy of digital templating in total hip arthroplasty
29. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty10.1007/s00264-006-0317-2 ↗
30. Influence of calibration on digital templating of hip arthroplasty10.1007/s00264-018-4120-7 ↗
31. Boese, C.K., Lechler, P., Rose, L., Dargel, J., Oppermann, J., Eysel, P., Geiges, H., and Bredow, J. (2015). Calibration Markers for Digital Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0128529 ↗