Safety-Aware Optimal Attitude Pointing for Low-Thrust Satellites
Source abstract
Abstract
In geostationary orbit, long eclipses and the seasonal variations in the direction and intensity of the solar input can cause damage to sensitive equipment during attitude maneuvers, which may inadvertently point the equipment towards the Sun. The requirement that transmitting and receiving antennae remain pointed towards the Earth creates further restrictions to pointing directions. The aim of the study is to construct a novel geometric and reinforcement-learning-based method to determine attitude guidance maneuvers that maintain the equipment in safe and operational orientations throughout an attitude maneuver. The attitude trajectory is computed numerically using the geometric framing of Pontryagin’s maximum principle applied to the vehicle kinematics using the global matrix Lie group representation on SO(3), and the angular velocities are shaped using free parameters. The values of these free parameters are determined by a reinforcement learning algorithm to avoid the forbidden areas while maintaining the pointing in operational areas (modeled as subsets of the two-sphere of all possible pointing directions of a particular axis). The method is applied to a model geosynchronous satellite and demonstrated in a simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Space Satellite Systems and Control · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control · Inertial Sensor and Navigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Facolta di Scienze e Tecnologie, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Universita’ 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Funding
European Regional DevelopmentFund (FiRST Lab Project \# FESR 1084)
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Attitude Commands Avoiding Bright Objects and Maintaining Communication with Ground Station10.2514/2.4469 ↗
2. Large Angle Slew Manoeuvres with Autonomous Sun Vector Avoidance10.2514/3.21283 ↗
3. Discretized Constrained Attitude Pathfinding and Control for Satellites10.2514/1.60189 ↗
4. Frazzoli, E., Dahleh, M.A., Feron, E., and Kornfeld, R. (2012, January 13–16). A Randomized Attitude Slew Planning Algorithm for Autonomous Spacecraft. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
5. Biggs, J.D., and Colley, L. (2016). Geometric Attitude Motion Planning for Spacecraft with Pointing and Actuator Constraints. J. Guid. Control Dyn., 1672–1677.10.2514/1.G001514 ↗
6. Sun, Y., Ran, X., Zhang, G., Xu, H., and Wang, X. (2020). AUV 3D Path Planning Based on the Improved Hierarchical Deep Q Network. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8020145 ↗
7. Macek, K., PetroviC, I., and Peric, N. (2002, January 3–5). A reinforcement learning approach to obstacle avoidance of mobile robots. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Maribor, Slovenia.
8. Obstacle avoidance through reinforcement learning
9. Kahn, G., Villaflor, A., Pong, V., Abbeel, P., and Levine, S. (2017). Uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning for collision avoidance. arXiv.
10. The autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance for USVs with ANOA deep reinforcement learning method10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105201 ↗
11. Singla, A., Padakandla, S., and Bhatnagar, S. (2019). Memory-based deep reinforcement learning for obstacle avoidance in UAV with limited environment knowledge. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.
12. Qiao, J., Hou, Z., and Ruan, X. (2008, January 20–23). Application of reinforcement learning based on neural network to dynamic obstacle avoidance. Proceedings of the IEEE 2008 International Conference on Information and Automation, Changsha, China.
13. Lütjens, B., Everett, M., and How, J.P. (2019, January 20–24). Safe reinforcement learning with model uncertainty estimates. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793611 ↗
14. Boltyanskii, V.G.E., Gamkrelidze, R.V.Y., and Pontryagin, L.S. (1960). The Theory of Optimal Processes: I. The Maximum Principle, TRW Space Technology Labs.
15. Jurdjevic, V. (1997). Geometric Control Theory, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511530036 ↗
16. Biggs, J.D. (2007). Integrable Hamiltonian Systems on Six Dimensional Lie Groups. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Reading].