journal article·2021-02-26Open access

Estimation of Saprolite Thickness Needed to Remove E. coli from Wastewater

Michael J. Vepraskas, Aziz Amoozegar, Terrence Gardner

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 5

Abstract

Saprolite, weathered bedrock, is being used to dispose of domestic sewage through septic system drainfields, but the thickness of saprolite needed to remove biological contaminants is unknown for most saprolites. This study developed and tested a simple method for estimating the thickness of saprolite needed below septic drainlines to filter E. coli from wastewater using estimates of the volume of pores that are smaller than the length of the coliform (≤10 μm). Particle size distribution (texture) and water retention data were obtained for 12 different saprolites from the Piedmont and Mountain regions of North Carolina (N.C.). Saprolite textures ranged from clay loam to coarse sand. The volume of pores with diameters ≤10 μm were determined by water retention measurements for each saprolite. The data were used in an equation to estimate the saprolite thickness needed to filter E. coli. The estimated saprolite thicknesses ranged from 36 cm in the clay loam to 113 cm for the coarse sand. The average thickness across all samples was 58 cm. Saprolite thickness estimates increased as silt percentage decreased and as sand percentage and in situ saturated hydraulic conductivity increased. Silt percentage may be most useful for estimating appropriate saprolite thicknesses in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fecal contamination and water quality · Groundwater flow and contamination studies · Soil and Unsaturated Flow

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620, USA

Funding

N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Census Bureau (2020, July 03). American Housing Survey for the United States: 2009, Current Housing Reports, Available online: http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/h150-09.pdf.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002). On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual.
3. Evaluation of on-site wastewater system Escherichia coli contributions to shallow groundwater in coastal North Carolina10.2166/wst.2011.310 ↗
4. Evaluation of data from the literature on the transport and survival of Escherichia coli and thermotolerant coliforms in aquifers under saturated conditions10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.018 ↗
5. Removal of bacteria Legionella Pneumophila, Escherichia Coli, and Bacillus Subtilis by (super)cavitation10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.11.004 ↗
6. N.C. Public Health-Environmental Health Section (NCPHEH) (2020, July 03). Section 1900-Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems. Available online: https://ehs.ncpublichealth.com/oswp/docs/rules/1900-Rules-08-2017.pdf.
7. Porosity factors that control the hydraulic conductivity of soil-saprolite transition zones10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010031x ↗
8. Hydraulic conductivity of saprolite as determined by channels and porous groundmass10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500040006x ↗
9. Daniels, R.B., Buol, S.W., Kleiss, H.J., and Ditzler, C.A. (1999). Soil Systems in North Carolina Department of Soil Science, Department of Soil Science, NC State University.
10. Physical factors affecting the transport and fate of colloids in saturated porous media10.1029/2002WR001340 ↗
11. Efficiency of saprolite for removing E. coli from simulated wastewater10.2166/wst.2020.514 ↗
12. Septic system performance on a coastal barrier island10.2134/jeq1988.00472425001700030009x ↗
13. Transport of E. coli in a sandy soil as impacted by depth to water table
14. Influence of size, shape and flexibility on bacterial passage through micropore membrane filters10.1021/es800720n ↗
15. Cellular, particle and environmental parameters influencing attachment in surface waters: A review10.1111/jam.12860 ↗
16. Hillel, D. (2004). Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics, Elsevier Academic Press.
17. Amoozegar, A., Hoover, M.T., Kleiss, H.J., Guertal, W.R., and Surbrugg, J.E. (1993). Evaluation of Saprolite for On-Site Wastewater Disposal, Water Resources Research Institute, University of North Carolina. UNC-WRRI-93-279.
18. Methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity and drainable porosity
19. A compact constant-head permeameter for measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity of the vadose zone10.2136/sssaj1989.03615995005300050009x ↗
20. Examination of models for determining saturated hydraulic conductivity by the constant head well permeameter method10.1016/j.still.2020.104572 ↗
21. Preparing soil cores collected by a sampling probe for laboratory analysis of soil hydraulic properties10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200060054x ↗
22. Dane, J.H., and Topp, G.C. (2002). Water retention and storage—pressure cell. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4—Physical Methods, Soil Science Social America Journal.10.2136/sssabookser5.4 ↗
23. Dane, J.H., and Topp, G.C. (2002). Particle-size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4—Physical Methods, Soil Science Social America Journal.10.2136/sssabookser5.4 ↗
24. Page, A.L. (1982). Cation exchange capacity. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2-Chemical Methods, ASA and SSSA. [2nd ed.].10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed ↗
25. Transport of E. coli in presence of naturally occurring colloids in saturated porous media10.1007/s41101-017-0037-z ↗