journal article·2025-12

Enhanced Near-Field Shock Wave Propagation in Underwater Explosion with Air-Tube

Jinda Wu, Ying Liu, Bin Wang

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica· Volume 38· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, enhanced near-field shock wave propagation in underwater explosion is achieved by introducing a fragile air-tube under the explosive. Firstly, based on the ALE algorithm in the ANSYS/LS-DYNA software, a numerical model integrating the water, the air, the explosive, and the air-tube is developed. Comparative discussion for explosion with air-tube in the air, as well as explosion in the water without air-tube, is made to highlight the distinct energy attenuation mechanism due to the introduction of the air-tube. Then, the influence of the tube geometry, as well as evolving structural boundaries, on the explosive process is discussed exhaustively. The results indicate that the air-tube acts as a shock focusing apparatus, significantly altering explosion flow dynamics. Tube damage mode relies on tube geometrical size. Time-refreshed structural boundary affects the position the fluid flowing into the air-tube, which in turn plays an impact on the bubble pattern and energy distribution near the tube outlet. Enhanced outlet pressure is strengthened along with the decrease of the outlet radius, cross-section height ratio and tube thickness. These insights offer valuable guidance for optimizing underwater explosion and possess prospectively scientific and practical significance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Liu DY, Zhao P, Chan SHY, Hng HH, Chen L. Effects of nano-sized aluminum on detonation characteristics and metal acceleration for RDX-based aluminized explosive. Defence Technol. 2021;17(2):327–37.10.1016/j.dt.2020.12.001 ↗
2. Hou ZW, Li N, Huang XL, Li C, Kang Y, Weng CS. Three-dimensional numerical simulation on near-field pressure evolution of dual-tube underwater detonation. Phys Fluids. 2022;34(3): 033304.10.1063/5.0086527 ↗
3. Gong Y, Zhang W, Du Z, Zhu Y. Numerical study on the sagging damage of the simplified hull girder subjected to underwater explosion bubble. Appl Sci. 2023;13(4):2318.10.3390/app13042318 ↗
4. Cui RN, Han R, Pei SC, Wang SP. Jet characteristics of the three-dimensional explosion bubble in a compressible fluid. Phys Fluids. 2023;35(8): 082123.10.1063/5.0163793 ↗
5. Zhang ZF, Zeng XW, Cai QY, Han KF. Numerical simulation on underwater shock wave focusing. Appl Mech Mater. 2012;105:121–6.
6. Luo X, Huang X, Zhong ZX, Hu HB, Chen XP. Research on the load characteristics of deep water explosions near curved boundaries. Phys Fluids. 2024; 36(7).10.1063/5.0222187 ↗
7. Zhang AM, Wang SP, Huang C, Wang B. Influences of initial and boundary conditions on underwater explosion bubble dynamics. Eur J Mech B Fluids. 2013;42:69–91.10.1016/j.euromechflu.2013.06.008 ↗
8. Qin Y, Wang Y, Wang Z, Yao X. The influence of various structure surface boundary conditions on pressure characteristics of underwater explosion. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2021;126(3):1093–123.
9. Berger S, Sadot O, Ben-Dor G. Experimental investigation on the shock-wave load attenuation by geometrical means. Shock Waves. 2010;20:29–40.10.1007/s00193-009-0237-3 ↗
10. Liu L, Guo R, Chen L, Cao Y, Yang Y, Zhao B. A prediction model for two-dimensional pressure distribution from underwater shock wave focusing by an ellipsoidal reflector. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016;140(6):4506–16.10.1121/1.4971327 ↗
11. Liu J, Guo X, Liu Z, Liu X, Liu Q. Pressure field investigation into oil&gas wellbore during perforating shaped charge explosion. J Petrol Sci Eng. 2019;172:1235–47.10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.068 ↗
12. Medvedev SP, Khomik SV, Maximova OG, Anderzhanov EK, Ivantsov AN, Mikhalkin VN, Tereza AM. Imitation of the explosion effects in a shock tube with a focusing element. Russ J Phys Chem B. 2023;17(4):962–6.10.1134/S1990793123040279 ↗
13. Remennikov A, Ngo T, Mohotti D, Uy B, Netherton M. Experimental investigation and simplified modeling of response of steel plates subjected to close-in blast loading from spherical liquid explosive charges. Int J Impact Eng. 2017;101:78–89.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.11.013 ↗
14. Mao WS, Zhong MS, Xie XB, Ma HY, Yang GL, Fan L. Dynamic response of a hollow cylindrical shell subjected to a near-field underwater explosion. J Appl Phys. 2024; 135(22).10.1063/5.0211797 ↗
15. Liu S, Huang Z, Li Y. Insight into the underwater implosion mechanisms of thin-walled metallic cylindrical shells. Ocean Eng. 2023;276: 114129.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114129 ↗
16. Huang Z, Dou S, Ren X, Li Y. Implosion mechanisms of metallic cylindrical shells subjected to combined explosive loading and hydrostatic pressure. Ocean Eng. 2024;313: 119397.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119397 ↗
17. Zhang AM, Li SM, Xu RZ, Pei SC, Li S, Liu YL. A theoretical model for compressible bubble dynamics considering phase transition and migration. J Fluid Mech. 2024;999:A58.10.1017/jfm.2024.954 ↗
18. Hwang SC, Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Park JC. Development of a fully Lagrangian MPS-based coupled method for simulation of fluid-structure interaction problems. J Fluids Struct. 2014;50:497–511.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.07.007 ↗
19. Ni L, Lang J, Chen L. Numerical simulation on the dynamic response of submarine pipelines under blast loading. Oil Gas Storage Transport. 2018;2:17.
20. Cheng M, Hung KC, Chong OY. Numerical study of water mitigation effects on blast wave. Shock Waves. 2005;14:217–23.10.1007/s00193-005-0267-4 ↗
21. Nagesh G, Gupta NK. Response of thin walled metallic structures to underwater explosion: a review. Int J Impact Eng. 2021;156: 103950.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103950 ↗
22. Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual volume II. Livermore; 2018.
23. Hirt CW, Amsden AA, Cook JL. An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. J Comput Phys. 1974;14(3):227–53.10.1016/0021-9991(74)90051-5 ↗
24. Chen G, Cheng Y, Zhang P, Cai S, Liu J. Blast resistance of metallic double arrowhead honeycomb sandwich panels with different core configurations under the paper tube-guided air blast loading. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;201: 106457.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106457 ↗
25. Zhang A, Li SM, Cui P, Li S, Liu YL. A unified theory for bubble dynamics. Phys Fluids. 2023;35(3): 033323.10.1063/5.0145415 ↗
26. Geers TL, Hunter KS. An integrated wave-effects model for an underwater explosion bubble. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111(4):1584–601.10.1121/1.1458590 ↗
27. Cole RH. Underwater explosion. Princeton University Press; 1948.10.5962/bhl.title.48411 ↗