A Multiphysics Ray Optics Model for the Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves in Plasmas and the Design of Laser-Based Diagnostics in Nuclear Fusion Reactors
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser-based methods are widely used techniques for thermonuclear plasma diagnostics, since they can probe the internal of the plasma, being contactless and non-invasive. The interferometer, the polarimeter and Thomson scattering are the most widespread techniques, providing line-integral information of the electron density and the magnetic field (interferometer–polarimeter) and local information of the electron density and temperature (Thomson scattering). The design of the diagnostics is a fundamental step, which usually requires an iterative process to maximise the performances of the diagnostics and their durability. In the future reactors, such as ITER and DEMO, the working environment will be much challenging, due to the various electro-mechanical, thermal and nuclear loads which may affect the life of the components and degrade the performances of the diagnostics. This work aims to present the modelling of plasma interferometry, polarimetry and Thomson scattering applied to a ray optics code. The model, developed on the COMSOL Multiphysics software, can be easily interfaced with multiphysics problems, allowing the possibility to test the performances of the diagnostics in several conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Wesson, J. (2004). Tokamaks, Claredon Press.
2. Igochine, V. (2015). Active Control of Magneto-Hydrodynamic Instabilities in Hot Plasmas, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44222-7 ↗
3. Influence of plasma diagnostics and constraints on the quality of equilibrium10.1063/1.4824200 ↗
4. New developments in the diagnostics for the fusion products on JET in preparation for ITER10.1063/1.3502038 ↗
5. Neutron spectroscopy measurements of 14 MeV neutrons at unprecedented energy resolution and implications for deuterium-tritium fusion plasma diagnostics10.1088/1361-6501/aaa675 ↗
6. Hutchinson, I.H. (1987). Principle of Plasma Diagnostics, Cambridge University Press.
7. Laser-aided plasma disagnostics10.13182/FST04-A507 ↗
8. Improved radiation measurements on JET—First results from an upgraded bolometer system10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.124 ↗
9. Maximum likelihood bolometric tomography for the determination of the uncertainties in the radiation emission on JET TOKAMAK10.1063/1.5027880 ↗
10. A comprehensive study of the uncertainties in bolometric tomography on JET using the maximum likelihood method10.1063/1.5119441 ↗
11. On the effects of missing chords and systematic errors on a new tomographic method for JET bolometry10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.120 ↗
12. Diagnostics and control for the steady state and pulsed tokamak DEMO10.1088/0029-5515/56/2/026009 ↗
13. Button, K.J. (1979). Infrared and Millimeter Waves, Academic Press.
14. Tests of a two-color interferometer and polarimeter for ITER density measurements10.1088/1361-6587/aa8c49 ↗
15. A review of plasma polarimetry—Theory and methods10.1088/0741-3335/41/2/001 ↗
16. Analysis of Faraday rotation in JET polarimetric measurements10.1088/0741-3335/53/3/035001 ↗
17. Recent developments of the JET far-infrared interferometer-polarimeter diagnostic10.1063/1.3478146 ↗
18. High resolution Thomson scattering for Joint European Torus (JET)10.1063/1.1787922 ↗
19. Froula, D.H., Glenzer, S.H., Luhmann, N.C., and Sheffield, J. (2011). Plasma Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation: Theory and Measurement Techniques, Oxford Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-374877-5.00008-7 ↗
20. Poloidal polarimeter for current density measurements in ITER10.1063/1.1804372 ↗
21. Technological challenges of ITER diagnostics10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.026 ↗
22. Walsh, M., Andrew, P., Barnsley, R., Bertalot, L., Boivin, R., Bora, D., Bouhamou, R., Ciattaglia, S., Costley, A.E., and Counsell, G. (2011, January 26–30). ITER diagnostic challenges. Proceedings of the 24th Symposium of Fusion Engineering, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052210 ↗
23. Diagnostics for plasma control—From ITER to DEMO10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.12.092 ↗
24. Diagnostics for plasma control on DEMO: Challenges of implementation10.1088/0029-5515/52/7/074015 ↗
25. Diagnostic mirrors for ITER: Research in the frame of International Tokamak Physics Activity10.1088/1741-4326/ab1446 ↗
26. Petykiewicz, J. (1991). Wave Optics, Springer.
27. Mouroulis, P., and Macdonald, J. (1997). Macdonald, Geometrical Optics and Optical Design, Oxford University Press.
28. Bittencourt, J.A. (2004). Pundamental of Plasma Physics, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-4030-1 ↗
29. Analysis of JET Polarimeter With a Propagation Code Based on the Stokes Formalism10.1109/TPS.2013.2252368 ↗
30. Thomson scattering density calibration by Rayleigh and rotational Raman scattering on NSTX10.1063/1.2956747 ↗
31. Analytical Approximation in the Theory of Relativistic Thomson Scattering for High Temperature Plasma10.1143/JJAP.18.1127 ↗
32. A polarization-based Thomson scattering technique10.1088/1748-0221/9/02/C02030 ↗
33. Exact relativistic expressions for polarization of incoherent Thomson scattering10.1063/1.4948488 ↗
34. Polarization of incoherent Thomson scattering for electron temperature measurement10.1088/1361-6587/aa61e2 ↗
35. (2020, December 19). ITER—The Way to New Energy. Available online: https://www.iter.org.
36. On the interpretability and uncertainty propagation of polarimetric measurements in thermonuclear plasmas as a function of the input polarisation and laser wavelength10.1088/1361-6587/abadd9 ↗