Feasibility Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach for Inhalation Exposure Assessment: Case Study for Biocide Spray
Source abstract
Abstract
Consumer products contain chemical substances that threaten human health. The zero-dimensional modeling methods and experimental methods have been used to estimate the inhalation exposure concentration of consumer products. The model and measurement methods have a spatial property problem and time/cost-consuming problem, respectively. For solving the problems due to the conventional methodology, this study investigated the feasibility of applying computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for the evaluation of inhalation exposure by comparing the experiment results and the zero-dimensional results with CFD results. To calculate the aerosol concentration, the CFD was performed by combined the 3D Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes equations and a discrete phased model using ANSYS FLUENT. As a result of comparing the three methodologies performed under the same simulation/experimental conditions, we found that the zero-dimensional spray model shows an approximately five times underestimated inhalation exposure concentration when compared with the CFD results and measurement results in near field. Additionally, the results of the measured concentration of aerosols at five locations and the CFD results at the same location were compared to show the possibility of evaluating inhalation exposure at various locations using CFD instead of the experimental method. The CFD results according to measurement positions can rationally predict the measurement results with low error. In conclusion, in the field of exposure science, a guideline for exposure evaluation using CFD, was found that complements the shortcomings of the conventional methodology, the zero-dimensional spray model and measurement method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Advanced Materials and Parts of Transportation Systems, Pusan National University, 2, Busandaehak-ro 63beon-gil, Geumjeong-gu, Busan 609-735, Korea
Research Institute of Environmental Health and Safety, 410, Jeongseojin-ro, Seo-gu, Incheon 404-844, Korea
Funding
Korea Ministry of Environment
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. RIVM (2007, October 30). ConsExpo Nano Tool. Available online: www.consexponano.nl.www.consexpoweb.nl.
2. RIVM (2016, October 30). Consexpo Web. Available online: www.consexpoweb.nl.
3. US EPA (2019, December 11). Consumer Exposure Model (CEM) User Guide, Available online: www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-06/documents/cem_2.1_user_guide.pdf.
4. Delmaar, J.E., and Bremmer, H.J. (2009). Modeling and Experimental Validation of the Inhalation Exposure of Consumers to Aerosols from Spray Cans and Trigger Sprays, RIVM.
5. Comparison of four probabilistic models (CARES®, CalendexTM, Zero-dimensional, and SHEDS) to estimate aggregate residential exposures to pesticides10.1038/jes.2012.54 ↗
6. Influence of parameter values and variances and algorithm architecture in ConsExpo model on modeled exposures10.1080/15459624.2013.816430 ↗
7. Modeling consumer exposure to spray products: An evaluation of the ConsexpoWeb and Consexponano models with experimental data10.1038/s41370-020-0239-x ↗
8. Comparison of modeled estimates of inhalation exposure to aerosols during use of consumer spray products10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.05.005 ↗
9. Analysing ventilation efficiency in a test chamber using age-of-air concept and CFD technology10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.08.013 ↗
10. Revisiting the effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near- and far-field air concentrations
11. Multi-objective optimization and comparison of surrogate models for separation performances of cyclone separator based on CFD, RSM, GMDH-neural network, back propagation-ANN and genetic algorithm
12. Experimental determination of the viscoelastic parameters of K-BKZ model and the influence of temperature field on the thickness distribution of ABS thermoforming10.1007/s00170-019-03408-8 ↗
13. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow patterns and particle deposition characteristics in children upper respiratory tracts
14. Modeling particle distribution and deposition in indoor environments with a new drift-flux model10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.044 ↗
15. An improved VOF-DEM model for soil-water interaction with particle size scaling10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103818 ↗
16. Xu, L., Zhou, X., Li, J., Hu, Y., Qi, H., Wen, W., Du, K., Ma, Y., and Yu, Y. (2020). Numerical simulations of molten breakup behaviors of a de laval-type nozzle, and the effects of atomization parameters on particle size distribution. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8091027 ↗
17. Silva, M.C.F., Campos, J.B.L.M., Miranda, J.M., and Araújo, J.D.P. (2020). Numerical study of single taylor bubble movement through a microchannel using different CFD packages. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8111418 ↗
18. McCraney, J., Weislogel, M., and Steen, P. (2020). OpenFOAM Simulations of Late Stage Container Draining in Microgravity. Fluids, 5.10.3390/fluids5040207 ↗
19. Tembely, M., Alameri, W.S., Alsumaiti, A.M., and Jouini, M.S. (2020). Pore-scale modeling of the effect of wettability on two-phase flow properties for newtonian and non-newtonian fluids. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12122832 ↗
20. Multiphase model of flow and separation phases in a whirlpool: Advanced simulation and phenomena visualization approach10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109846 ↗
21. Numerical study on DPM dispersion and distribution in an underground development face based on dynamic mesh10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.05.005 ↗
22. Using a coupled CFD – DPM approach to predict particle settling in a horizontal air stream10.1016/j.apt.2019.02.001 ↗
23. Wang, P., Zhu, X., and Li, Y. (2020). Analysis of Flow and Wear Characteristics of Solid–Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Rotating Flow Channel. Processes, 8.10.3390/pr8111512 ↗
24. The effects of ventilation and floor heating systems on the dispersion and deposition of fine particles in an enclosed environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.049 ↗
25. ANSYS Inc (2018). ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc.
26. Investigation of turbulence model and numerical scheme combinations for practical finite-volume large eddy simulations
27. Simulating flow over circular spillways by using different turbulence models
28. Numerical simulation of aerosol deposition from turbulent flows using three-dimensional RANS and les turbulence models
29. Park, D., and Go, J.S. (2020). Design of cyclone separator critical diameter model based on machine learning and cfd. Processes, 8.10.20944/preprints202011.0187.v1 ↗
30. Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
31. Designing an Adhesive Pillar Shape with Deep Learning-Based Optimization10.1021/acsami.0c04123 ↗