journal article·2020-09-17Open access

Biomechanical Effect of Various Tibial Bearing Materials in Uni-Compartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Finite Element Analysis

Yoon Hae Kwak, Hyoung-Taek Hong, Yong-Gon Koh, Kyoung-Tak Kang

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 18

Abstract

This paper aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects of tibial bearing materials, from ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) to poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and carbon-fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CFR-PEEK). The studies were conducted based on a validated finite element model. The geometry of the intact knee model was developed from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the left knee joint of a 37-year-old healthy male volunteer. Three different loading conditions, related to the loads applied in the experimental research, were applied to this study for model predictions and validation. The contact stress in the other compartments was under normal walking conditions. Also, stresses on five regions of the tibia bone were analyzed under normal walking conditions. The lowest contact stress between the lateral meniscus and tibial cartilage was achieved in the order of the use of CFR-PEEK, PEEK, and UHMWPE tibial bearings. Moreover, CFR-PEEK and PEEK tibial bearings indicated lower and greater stresses on cortical and trabecular bones, respectively, compared to the UHMWPE tibial bearing. These results show that CFR-PEEK can be used as a tibial bearing material as an alternative to UHMWPE, and such a change in the material may be a good method for reducing potential anteromedial pain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joint Reconstruction Center, Yonsei Sarang Hospital, 10 Hyoryeong-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06698, Korea

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up10.2106/JBJS.C.00568 ↗
2. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.012 ↗
3. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: Results of 1000 cases10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767 ↗
4. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup
5. Knee biomechanics after UKA and its relation to the ACL—A robotic investigation10.1002/jor.20082 ↗
6. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: A ten-year survival study10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.0800983 ↗
7. Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.020 ↗
8. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty10.1007/s11999-011-1961-4 ↗
9. Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision: PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3777 cases of arthrosis10.3109/17453679209154777 ↗
10. Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1097/00003086-199805000-00020 ↗
11. Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16325 ↗
12. The conflicting requirements of laxity and conformity in total knee replacement10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00139-0 ↗
13. Clinical trade-offs in cross-linked ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene used in total joint arthroplasty10.1002/jbm.b.32887 ↗
14. Tradeoffs amongst fatigue, wear, and oxidation resistance of cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.012 ↗
15. Brockett, C.L., Carbone, S., Fisher, J., and Jennings, L.M. (2015, January 24–28). PEEK and CFR PEEK as an alternative to UHMWPE in total knee replacement. Proceedings of the ORS Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
16. PEEK and CFR-PEEK as alternative bearing materials to UHMWPE in a fixed bearing total knee replacement: An experimental wear study10.1016/j.wear.2016.12.010 ↗
17. Pitch-based carbon-fibre-reinforced poly (ether-ether-ketone) OPTIMA assessed as a bearing material in a mobile bearing unicondylar knee joint10.1243/09544119JEIM471 ↗
18. Evaluation of factors affecting tibial bone strain after unicompartmental knee replacement10.1002/jor.22283 ↗
19. The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00244-5 ↗
20. Finite element analysis of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: The influence of tibial component coronal alignment10.4103/0366-6999.168044 ↗
21. Koh, Y.-G., Hong, H.-T., and Kang, K.-T. (2019). Biomechanical Effect of UHMWPE and CFR-PEEK insert on tibial component in unicompartmental knee replacement in different varus and valgus alignments. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12203345 ↗
22. Graft extrusion related to the position of allograft in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation: Biomechanical comparison between parapatellar and transpatellar approaches using finite element analysis10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.030 ↗
23. Computational model-based probabilistic analysis of in vivo material properties for ligament stiffness using the laxity test and computed tomography10.1007/s10856-016-5797-z ↗
24. Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis10.1002/jor.23279 ↗
25. Probabilistic evaluation of the material properties of the in vivo subject-specific articular surface using a computational model10.1002/jbm.b.33666 ↗
26. Patient-specific medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has a greater protective effect on articular cartilage in the lateral compartment: A finite element analysis10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0115.R2 ↗
27. Why lateral meniscectomy is more dangerous than medial meniscectomy. A finite element study10.1002/jor.20037 ↗
28. The effects of static, dynamic and fatigue behavior on three-dimensional shape optimization of hip prosthesis by finite element method10.1016/j.matdes.2006.08.012 ↗
29. Age, gender, and bone lamellae elastic moduli10.1002/jor.1100180315 ↗
30. The ‘instantaneous’ compressive modulus of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb10.1093/rheumatology/38.2.124 ↗
31. How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00305-6 ↗
32. A subject specific multibody model of the knee with menisci10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.02.020 ↗
33. Biomechanical function of the human anterior cruciate ligament10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80081-7 ↗
34. Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee10.1016/0021-9290(95)00149-2 ↗
35. Zimmer, I. (2010). Zimmer® Unicompartmental High Flex Knee: Intramedullary, Spacer Block Option and Extramedullary Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques, Zimmer, Inc.
36. The valgus inclination of the tibial component increases the risk of medial tibial condylar fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.043 ↗
37. Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00179-8 ↗
38. Can medio-lateral baseplate position and load sharing induce asymptomatic local bone resorption of the proximal tibia? A finite relement study10.1186/1749-799X-4-26 ↗
39. Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw fixation system in spinal adjacent levels using polyetheretherketone, carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone, and traditional titanium as rod materials10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.052 ↗
40. Biomechanical effects of different varus and valgus alignments in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.006 ↗
41. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.07.027 ↗
42. Effect of reinforcement morphology on high-speed sliding friction and wear of PEEK polymers10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.065 ↗
43. Function of the anterior cruciate ligament after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: An in vitro robotic study10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.018 ↗
44. International Organization for Standardization (2002). ISO 14243-1: Implants for Surgery—Wear of Total Knee-Joint Prostheses—Part 1: Loading and Displacement Parameters for Wear-Testing Machines with Load Control and Corresponding Environmental Conditions for Test, ISO.
45. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator10.1115/1.4001678 ↗
46. Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.046 ↗
47. Measuring the effect of femoral malrotation on knee joint biomechanics for total knee arthroplasty using computational simulation10.1302/2046-3758.511.BJR-2016-0107.R1 ↗
48. Li, C.S., Vannabouathong, C., Sprague, S., and Bhandari, M. (2015). The use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: A systematic review. Clin. Med. Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet. Disord., 8.10.4137/CMAMD.S20354 ↗
49. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.001 ↗
50. Ranawat Award Paper: Predicting total knee replacement pain: A prospective, observational study10.1097/01.blo.0000092983.12414.e9 ↗
51. Revision total knee arthroplasty: Causes and outcomes10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V42N4p178 ↗
52. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?10.1097/00003086-200211000-00003 ↗
53. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 ↗
54. Editorial Comment: Advances in PEEK Technology10.1007/s11999-016-4960-7 ↗
55. Influence of contact pressure, cross-shear and counterface material on the wear of PEEK and CFR-PEEK for orthopaedic applications10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.005 ↗
56. Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials10.1007/s10856-008-3558-3 ↗
57. The wear performance of PEEK-OPTIMA based self-mating couples10.1016/j.wear.2009.08.023 ↗
58. Biomechanical comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing for unicomparmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis10.1002/jor.22499 ↗
59. Load sharing and ligament strains in balanced, overstuffed and understuffed UKA. A validated finite element analysis10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.020 ↗
60. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement10.2106/00004623-198264070-00009 ↗
61. The influence of tibial component intramedullary stems and implant-cortex contact on the strain distribution of the proximal tibia following total knee arthroplasty. An in vitro study10.1097/00003086-198607000-00020 ↗
62. Finite element analysis of the implanted proximal tibia: A relationship between the initial cancellous bone stresses and implant migration10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00022-0 ↗