Using Autoregressive with Exogenous Input Models to Study Pulsatile Flows
Source abstract
Abstract
The content of this paper shows the first outcomes of a supplementary method to simulate the behavior of a simple design formed by two rectangular leaflets under a pulsatile flow condition. These problems are commonly handled by using Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) simulations; however, one of its main limitations are the high computational cost required to conduct short time simulations and the vast number of parameter adjustments to simulate different scenarios. In order to overcome these disadvantages, we propose a system identification method with hereditary computation—AutoRegressive with eXogenous (ARX) input method—to train a model with FSI simulation outcomes and then use this model to simulate the outputs that are commonly measured from this kind of simulation, such as the pressure difference and the opening area of the leaflets. Numerical results of the presented methodology show that our model is able to follow the trend with significant agreement with the FSI results, with an average correlation coefficient R of Rtr=90.14% and Rtr=92.27% in training; whereas for validation, the average R is Rval=93.31% and Rval=83.08% for opening area and pressure difference, respectively. The system identification model is efficiently capable of estimating the outputs of the FSI approach; however, it is not intended to substitute FSI simulations, but to complement them when the requirement is to conduct many repetitions of the phenomena with similar conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computing, Electronics and Mechatronics, Universidad de las Americas Puebla, San Andres Cholula, Puebla 72810, Mexico
Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de las Americas Puebla, San Andres Cholula, Puebla 72810, Mexico
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Perspectives on system identification10.1016/j.arcontrol.2009.12.001 ↗
2. Neural network ARX model for gas conditioning tower10.1080/02286203.2018.1538848 ↗
3. Field validation study of a time and temperature indexed autoregressive with exogenous (ARX) model for building thermal load prediction10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.083 ↗
4. A hybrid model for stock market forecasting and portfolio selection based on ARX, grey system and RS theories10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.103 ↗
5. Modeling and analysis of driving behavior based on a probability-weighted ARX model10.1109/TITS.2012.2207893 ↗
6. A stochastic driver pedal behavior model incorporating road information10.1109/THMS.2017.2674301 ↗
7. ARX model-based gearbox fault detection and localization under varying load conditions10.1016/j.jsv.2010.07.001 ↗
8. Nguyen, Q.C., Vu, V.H., and Thomas, M. (2019, January 8–10). ARX Model for Experimental Vibration Analysis of Grinding Process by Flexible Manipulator. Proceedings of the Surveillance, Vishno and AVE conferences, INSA-Lyon, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France.
9. A modeling and control approach to magnetic levitation system based on state-dependent ARX model10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.10.016 ↗
10. Tian, X., Peng, H., Zeng, X., Zhou, F., Xu, W., and Peng, X. (2019). A modelling and predictive control approach to linear two-stage inverted pendulum based on RBF-ARX model. Int. J. Control, 1–19.10.23919/ChiCC.2018.8483146 ↗
11. Tran, N.T., Khan, A., and Choi, W. (2017). State of charge and state of health estimation of AGM VRLA batteries by employing a dual extended kalman filter and an ARX model for online parameter estimation. Energies, 10.10.3390/en10010137 ↗
12. ARX model for interstitial glucose prediction during and after physical activities10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.07.013 ↗
13. Parametric model derivation of transfer function for noninvasive estimation of aortic pressure by radial tonometry10.1109/10.764946 ↗
14. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation assessment using an ARX model: Comparative study using step response and phase shift analysis10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00015-8 ↗
15. Duran-Hernandez, C., Perez-Santiago, R., Etcheverry, G., and Ledesma-Alonso, R. (2019, January 26–29). Modeling of a Simplified 2D Cardiac Valve by Means of System Identification. Proceedings of the MCPR: Pattern Recognition, Querétaro, Mexico.10.1007/978-3-030-21077-9_34 ↗
16. Horsten, J.B.A.M. (1990). On the Analysis of Moving Heart Valves: A Numerical Fluid-Structure Interaction Model. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven].
17. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: Implications for calcific aortic valve disease10.1007/s10237-012-0375-x ↗
18. Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method10.1016/0021-9991(72)90065-4 ↗
19. A coupled mitral valve—Left ventricle model with fluid–structure interaction10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.042 ↗
20. Fluid-structure interaction of a pulsatile flow with an aortic valve model: A combined experimental and numerical study10.1002/cnm.2945 ↗
21. Fluid-Structure interaction study of transcatheter aortic valve dynamics using smoothed particle hydrodynamics10.1007/s13239-016-0285-7 ↗
22. Evaluation of a fictitious domain method for predicting dynamic response of mechanical heart valves10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2004.04.007 ↗
23. A two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model of the aortic value10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00068-3 ↗
24. A three-dimensional computational analysis of fluid–structure interaction in the aortic valve10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00244-0 ↗
25. An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid–structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.040 ↗
26. A framework for designing patient-specific bioprosthetic heart valves using immersogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis10.1002/cnm.2938 ↗
27. Mao, W., Caballero, A., McKay, R., Primiano, C., and Sun, W. (2017). Fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of the aortic and mitral valves in a realistic 3D left ventricle model. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0184729 ↗
28. Development of a Computational Method for Simulating Tricuspid Valve Dynamics10.1007/s10439-019-02243-y ↗
29. Mohammed, A.M., Ariane, M., and Alexiadis, A. (2020). Using Discrete Multiphysics Modelling to Assess the Effect of Calcification on Hemodynamic and Mechanical Deformation of Aortic Valve. ChemEngineering, 4.10.20944/preprints202004.0107.v1 ↗
30. Transapical mitral valve repair with neochordae implantation: FSI analysis of neochordae number and complexity of leaflet prolapse10.1002/cnm.3297 ↗
31. Computer simulations of transapical mitral valve repair with neochordae implantation: Clinical implications10.1016/j.xjon.2020.05.010 ↗
32. Fluid-Structure Interaction Models of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dynamics in an Experimental Pulse Duplicator10.1007/s10439-020-02466-4 ↗
33. Computational investigation of left ventricular hemodynamics following bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement
34. Toma, M., Einstein, D.R., Kohli, K., Caroll, S.L., Bloodworth, C.H., Cochran, R.P., Kunzelman, K.S., and Yoganathan, A.P. (2020). Effect of Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair on Chordal Strain: Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations. Biology, 9.10.3390/biology9070173 ↗
35. Toma, M., Einstein, D.R., Bloodworth, C.H., Kohli, K., Cochran, R.P., Kunzelman, K.S., and Yoganathan, A.P. (2020). Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Subject-Specific Mitral Valve Regurgitation Treatment with an Intra-Valvular Spacer. Prosthesis, 2.10.3390/prosthesis2020007 ↗
36. Peña Pérez, N. (2016). Windkessel Modeling of the Human Arterial System. [Bachelor’s Thesis, University Carlos III of Madrid].
37. The arterial windkessel10.1007/s11517-008-0359-2 ↗
38. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery10.1007/s10237-018-1045-4 ↗
39. Data assimilation and modelling of patient-specific single-ventricle physiology with and without valve regurgitation10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.030 ↗
40. Modeling left ventricular dynamics using a switched system approach based on a modified atrioventricular piston unit10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.007 ↗
41. Structural identifiability analysis of a cardiovascular system model10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.02.005 ↗
42. Experimental study of a model valve with flexible leaflets in a pulsatile flow10.1017/jfm.2013.611 ↗
43. Duran-Hernandez, C., Ledesma-Alonso, R., Etcheverry, G., and Perez-Santiago, R. (2018). Aerodynamic Coefficient Calculation of a Sphere Using Incompressible Computational Fluid Dynamics Method. Technology, Science, and Culture: A Global Vision, IntechOpen.
44. Aortic valve dynamics using a fluid structure interaction model–The physiology of opening and closing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.05.012 ↗
45. Fluid–structure interaction models of the mitral valve: Function in normal and pathological states10.1098/rstb.2007.2123 ↗
46. Assessment of calcified aortic valve leaflet deformations and blood flow dynamics using fluid-structure interaction modeling10.1016/j.imu.2017.09.001 ↗
47. ARMA lattice identification: A new hereditary algorithm10.1109/78.485931 ↗
48. Ljung, L. (1987). System Identification: Theory for the User, Prentice-Hall.
49. Testing for Gaussianity and linearity of a stationary time series10.1111/j.1467-9892.1982.tb00339.x ↗
50. Swami, A., Mendel, J.M., and Nikias, C.L. (1995). Higher-Order Spectral Analysis Toolbox, The Mathworks Inc.