Appraisal of Significance of Acoustic Parameters in Contribution to Human Annoyance
Source abstract
Abstract
The goal of this paper was to describe a study which aimed to determine the significance of acoustic parameters in terms of some typical audio signals which occur in common urban environments. The focus when establishing the significance was set on their relevance with respect to the annoyance of the study participants. In order to carry out this experiment, an acoustic environment recording was made in which short distracting signals were inserted into the acoustic environment background sound. The recording obtained in the described way was then reproduced to listeners in laboratory conditions. Furthermore, the experiment was envisaged in a way that the participants had the option to adjust the following acoustic parameters: the amplitude, duration and the amplitude growth rates of the short signals. In order to prove the statistical significance of the obtained results from the experiment and the study premise, the chi-square test was applied. Thus, according to the results of the study, the ranking of the objective acoustic parameters was achieved with respect to the human annoyance i.e., it can be concluded that the most common reason for the human annoyance in different acoustic environments is the sound amplitude, then its duration and finally its amplitude growth rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (1999). Guidelines for Community Noise, World Health Organization.
2. Wothge, J., Belke, C., Möhler, U., Guski, R., and Schreckenberg, D. (2017). The Combined Effects of Aircraft and Road Traffic Noise and Aircraft and Railway Noise on Noise Annoyance—An Analysis in the Context of the Joint Research Initiative NORAH. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal., 14.10.3390/ijerph14080871 ↗
3. Miedema, H., and Oudshoorn, C. (2002, January 20). Position paper on dose response relationships between transportation noise and annoyance. Proceedings of the EU’s Future Noise Policy, WG2–Dose/Effect, Luxembourg.
4. Acoustic Environments and Soundscapes
5. Noise Pollution: A Modern Plague10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3180318be5 ↗
6. Health effects caused by noise: Evidence in the literature from the past 25 years
7. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X ↗
8. European Commission (2015). Noise Impacts on Health. Science for Environment Policy, European Union.
9. Sliwi´nska-Kowalska, M., and Zaborowski, K. (2017). WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Permanent Hearing Loss and Tinnitu. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14101139 ↗
10. Noise pollution and annoyance: An urban soundscapes study10.4103/1463-1741.155833 ↗
11. Eriksson, C., Pershagen, G., and Nilsson, M. (2018). Biological Mechanisms Related to Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects by Environmental Noise, World Health Organization.
12. Soundscape analysis in a residential area: An evaluation of noise and people’s mind
13. Introduction to the special issue on soundscapes10.1121/1.4810760 ↗
14. From Sonic Environment to Soundscape10.1201/b19145-3 ↗
15. Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.011 ↗
16. WHO (2018). Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region, Regional Office for Europe.
17. Efficiency of single noise barriers10.1016/0022-460X(91)90765-C ↗
18. Performance of noise barriers with various edge shapes and acoustical conditions10.1016/j.apacoust.2003.08.006 ↗
19. Acoustic design by topology optimization10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.042 ↗
20. Shape design optimization of road acoustic barriers featuring top-edge devices by using genetic algorithms and boundary elements10.1016/j.enganabound.2015.10.011 ↗
21. Maffei, L., Masullo, M., and Aletta, F. (2012, January 19). Influence of the design of railway noise barriers on soundscape perception. Proceedings of the INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference, New York, NY, USA.
22. The influence of visual characteristics of barriers on railway noise perception10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.025 ↗
23. Noise barriers with varying cross-section optimized by genetic algorithms10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.05.005 ↗
24. Optimizacija akustičnih i ekonomskih značajki zvučnih barijera upotrebom genetičkog algoritma
25. Kang, J., and Schulte-Fortkamp, B. (2016). Perceived soundscapes and health-related quality of life, context, restoration, and personal characteristics. Soundscape and the Built Environment, CRC Press.
26. Urban soundscapes: A quasi-experiment in landscape architecture10.1080/01426397.2015.1117062 ↗
27. Towards an agile participatory urban soundscape planning framework10.1080/09640568.2017.1331843 ↗
28. Public Space Users’ Soundscape Evaluations in Relation to Their Activities. An Amsterdam-Based Study10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01593 ↗
29. Positive health-related effects of perceiving urban soundscapes: A systematic review10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32044-0 ↗
30. A principal components model of soundscape perception10.1121/1.3493436 ↗
31. Urban Acoustic Environments – An Acoustic Model for Total Distraction Coefficient10.3813/AAA.919316 ↗
32. A psychoacoustic annoyance concept for application in sound quality10.1121/1.418779 ↗
33. Procedure for calculating loudness of temporally variable sounds10.1121/1.381580 ↗
34. Zwicker, E., and Fastl, H. (2013). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. 2nd edition, Springer Science & Business Media.
35. A Revision of Zwicker’s Loudness Model
36. A Model for the Prediction of Thresholds, Loudness and Partial Loudness
37. A Model of Loudness Applicable to Time-Varying Sounds
38. Effects of building mechanical system noise on worker performance and perception10.1121/1.3384515 ↗
39. Ryherd, E.E., and Wang, L.M. (2010). The Effects of Noise from Building Mechanical Systems with Tonal Components on Human Performance and Perception, ASHRAE Transactions.
40. Suhanek, M. (2013). Evaluation of Soundscapes regarding Sudden and Unexpected Sound Changes. [PhD. Thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing].
41. Application of a methodology for categorizing and differentiating urban soundscapes using acoustical descriptors and semantic-differential attributes10.1121/1.4807804 ↗
42. Research Methods in Psychology and other Social Sciences
43. Newbold, P., Carlson, W.L., and Thorne, B. (2007). Statistics for Business and Economics, Pearson Education, Inc.