journal article·2020-05-22Open access

Mutation Rate Model Used in the DNA VIEW Program

Tomasz Krajka

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 10

Abstract

The first problem considered in this paper is the problem of correctness of a mutation model used in the DNA VIEW program. To this end, we theoretically predict population allele frequency changes in time according to this and similar models (we determine the limit frequencies of alleles—they are uniformly distributed). Furthermore, we evaluate the speed of the above changes using computer simulation applied to our DNA database. Comparing uniformly distributed allele frequencies with these existing in the population (for example, using entropy), we conclude that this mutation model is not correct. The evolution does not follow this direction (direction of uniformly distributed frequencies). The second problem relates to the determination of the extent to which an incorrect mutation model can disturb DNA VIEW program results. We show that in typical computations (simple paternity testing without maternal mutation) this influence is negligible, but in the case of maternal mutation, this should be taken into account. Furthermore, we show that this model is inconsistent from a theoretical viewpoint. Equivalent methods result in different error levels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · Genetic Associations and Epidemiology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Production Computerisation and Robotisation, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.07.002 ↗
2. Estimation of mutation rates from parentage exclusion data: Applications to STR and VNTR loci10.1016/0027-5107(96)00014-0 ↗
3. Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population10.1073/pnas.75.6.2868 ↗
4. Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: The stepwise mutation model revisited10.1093/genetics/133.3.737 ↗
5. Triplet repeat mutations in human disease10.1126/science.256.5058.784 ↗
6. The relationship between microsatellite slippage mutation rate and the number of repeat units10.1093/molbev/msg228 ↗
7. Dinucleotide repeats in the Drosophila and human genomes have complex, length-dependent mutation processes10.1093/molbev/msg084 ↗
8. Likelihood-based estimation of microsatellite mutation rates10.1093/genetics/164.2.781 ↗
9. Hardy, Weinberg and language impediments10.1093/genetics/152.3.821 ↗
10. Evett, I.W., and Weir, B.S. (1998). Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists, Sinauer Associates. [1st ed.].
11. Hartl, D.L., and Jones, E.W. (1998). Genetics: Principles and Analysis, Jones and Bartlett Publishers. [4th ed.].
12. Weir, B.S. (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II. Methods for Discrete Population Genetic Data, Sinauer Associates. [2nd ed.].
13. Buckleton, J., Triggs, C.M., and Walsh, S.J. (2004). Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation, CRC Press. [1st ed.].
14. Balakrishnan, N., Voinov, V., and Nikulin, M.S. (2013). Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit Tests with Applications, Academic Press.
15. A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113284 ↗
16. Fisher, R.A. (1934). Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver and Boyd. [5th ed.].
17. An exact test for population differentiation10.2307/2410454 ↗
18. A correction to the exact test based on the Ewens sampling distribution10.1017/S0016672300034236 ↗
19. Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles10.2307/2532296 ↗
20. (2020, March 26). Forensic Mathematics. Available online: http://dna-view.com/.
21. Symbolic kinship program10.1093/genetics/145.2.535 ↗
22. Non-fatherhood or mutation?: A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00564-3 ↗
23. Butler, J.M. (2014). Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Interpretation, Academic Press. [1st ed.].
24. (2020, March 26). STRBase SRD 130, Available online: https://strbase.nist.gov/mutation.htm.
25. Lütkepohl, H. (1996). Handbook of Matrices, Wiley.
26. Cohn, P.M. (1994). Elements of Linear Algebra, Chapman & Hall/CRC. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-1-4899-3286-0 ↗
27. Kuttler, K. (2007). An Introduction to Linear Algebra, Brigham Young University.
28. Goebel, K., and Kirk, W.A. (1990). Topics in Metric Fixed Point Theory, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511526152 ↗
29. Vein, R., and Dale, P. (1999). Determinants and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics, Springer. [1st ed.].
30. Muir, T., and Metzler, W.H. (2003). A Treatise on the Theory of Determinants, Dover Publications Inc.
31. Aitken, C.G.G. (1995). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, John Wiley & Sons Inc.. [1st ed.].
32. Balding, D.J., and Steele, C.D. (2015). Weight-of-Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].10.1002/9781118814512 ↗