journal article·2019-10-11Open access

The Influence of Loading Program on the Stimulated Callus Mineralization

Justyna Miodowska, Jan Bielski

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 20

Abstract

The aim of this work is to describe the change of physical properties of the callus material with the use of the proposed mathematical model for callus remodeling. Callus tissue can be considered as a biomaterial where it’s properties change over time due to the stimulated healing process. The proposed model is based on the mechanical stimulus theory. It is used to estimate the stress-stimulated change in the callus, Young’s modulus, and the density in the case of a mandible fracture. Three healing loading programs are discussed and compared: optimal, intermittent, and intermittent with residual load. Here, the optimal loading program is understood as the in-time change of stimulating loads, which results in the shortest necessary healing time and, simultaneously, in the most uniform distribution of material density in the analyzed domain. The necessary healing time is a period after which the callus density (and hence the Young’s modulus) reaches the desired value. The results of the study suggest a significant difference in the value of the callus maximal density between all three analyzed loading programs for a given healing time interval. The highest values of the density are obtained using the optimal loading program, however, all three programs provide satisfactory density distributions. The analytical results are compared with the callus density estimation based on the computer tomography (CT) medical data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone fractures and treatments · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Bone health and osteoporosis research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Applied Mechanics, Cracow University of Technology, al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Cracow, Poland

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Wong, C.W., Loh, J.S.P., and Islam, I. (2016). The Role of Finite Element Analysis in Studying Potential Failure of Mandibular Reconstruction Methods. Perusal Finite Elem. Method, 189–210.10.5772/64890 ↗
2. Healing Mechanism in Bone Fracture
3. Difference of natural teeth and implant-supported restoration: A comparison of bone remodeling simulations10.1016/j.jds.2014.11.001 ↗
4. Numerical analysis of displacements of mandible bone parts using various elements for fixation of subcondylar fractures
5. Mandibular reconstruction—Biomechanical strength analysis (FEM) based on a retrospective clinical analysis of selected patients
6. Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage10.1016/0021-9290(85)90204-0 ↗
7. Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage10.1016/8756-3282(93)90235-3 ↗
8. Wolff, J. (1986). The Law of Bone Remodelling, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-71031-5 ↗
9. Bone’s Mechanostat: A 2003 Update10.1002/ar.a.10119 ↗
10. Multi-factorial analysis of variables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: Prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.030 ↗
11. Numerical simulation of dental bone remodeling induced by implant-supported fixed partial denture with or without cantilever extension10.1002/cnm.2579 ↗
12. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.004 ↗
13. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01000.x ↗
14. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models10.1016/0021-9290(92)90056-7 ↗
15. Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.020 ↗
16. Prediction of mandibular bone remodelling induced by fixed partial dentures10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.016 ↗
17. Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.024 ↗
18. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure10.2106/00004623-197759070-00021 ↗
19. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude10.1007/BF02553711 ↗
20. Van Bone remodelling in humans is load-drivenbut not lazy10.1038/ncomms5855 ↗
21. A new model of bone remodelling
22. Callus remodelling model
23. Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.037 ↗
24. Vander Sloten, J. (1996). Biomechanical behaviour of system bone-callus-implant. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics, Leuven, Belgium, 28–31 August 1996, Pub. The European Society of Biomechanics.
25. Predictions of bone remodeling around dental implant systems10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.032 ↗
26. Biomechanical analysis of bone remodeling following mandibular reconstruction using fibula free flap10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.03.008 ↗
27. An in-vitro evaluation of a novel design of miniplate for fixation of fracture segments in the transition zone of parasymphysis-body region of mandible using finite element analysis10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.004 ↗
28. Effect of different miniplate osteosynthesis in different mandibular angle fracture patterns on bite force: A 3D finite element analysis10.1016/j.ajoms.2018.02.014 ↗
29. Is the callus shape an optimal response to a mechanobiological stimulus?10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.07.015 ↗
30. The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures-biomechanical analysis10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.063 ↗
31. Optimum degree of bone-implant contact in bone remodelling induced by dental implant10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.374 ↗
32. Milewski, G., and Kromka-Szydek, M. (2010). Podstawy Biomechaniki Stomatologicznej, Politechnika Krakowska.
33. Harle, F., Champy, M., and Terry, B. (1999). Atlas of Craniomaxillofacial Osteosynthesis—Miniplates, Microplates, and Screws, Thieme, Stuttgart.
34. The biology of fracture healing10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031 ↗
35. Modified bone density-dependent orthotropic material model of human mandibular bone10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.09.013 ↗
36. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6 ↗
37. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone10.1016/1350-4533(95)97314-F ↗
38. A comparative mechanical and bone remodelling study of all-ceramic posterior inlay and onlay fixed partial dentures10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.003 ↗
39. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling10.1007/BF02406129 ↗
40. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young’s modulus of elasticity of compact bone10.1016/0021-9290(88)90006-1 ↗
41. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density10.1016/0021-9290(88)90008-5 ↗
42. A computational method for determining tissue material properties in ovine fracture calluses using electronic speckle pattern interferometry and finite element analysis10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.09.013 ↗
43. Finite element analysis using interfragmentary strain theory for the fracture healing process to which composite bone plates are applied10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.008 ↗
44. Evaluation of residual stresses due to bone callus growth: A computational study10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.021 ↗
45. Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.021 ↗
46. Ramaswamy, G., Bidez, M.W., and Misch, C.E. (2014). Bone Response to Mechanical Loads, Elsevier Inc.. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-323-07845-0.00006-3 ↗