journal article·2021-06-04Open access

Statistical Analysis of Tritium Breeding Ratio Deviations in the DEMO Due to Nuclear Data Uncertainties

Jin Hun Park, Pavel Pereslavtsev, Alexandre Konobeev, Christian Wegmann

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 11

Abstract

For the stable and self-sufficient functioning of the DEMO fusion reactor, one of the most important parameters that must be demonstrated is the Tritium Breeding Ratio (TBR). The reliable assessment of the TBR with safety margins is a matter of fusion reactor viability. The uncertainty of the TBR in the neutronic simulations includes many different aspects such as the uncertainty due to the simplification of the geometry models used, the uncertainty of the reactor layout and the uncertainty introduced due to neutronic calculations. The last one can be reduced by applying high fidelity Monte Carlo simulations for TBR estimations. Nevertheless, these calculations have inherent statistical errors controlled by the number of neutron histories, straightforward for a quantity such as that of TBR underlying errors due to nuclear data uncertainties. In fact, every evaluated nuclear data file involved in the MCNP calculations can be replaced with the set of the random data files representing the particular deviation of the nuclear model parameters, each of them being correct and valid for applications. To account for the uncertainty of the nuclear model parameters introduced in the evaluated data file, a total Monte Carlo (TMC) method can be used to analyze the uncertainty of TBR owing to the nuclear data used for calculations. To this end, two 3D fully heterogeneous geometry models of the helium cooled pebble bed (HCPB) and water cooled lithium lead (WCLL) European DEMOs were utilized for the calculations of the TBR. The TMC calculations were performed, making use of the TENDL-2017 nuclear data library random files with high enough statistics providing a well-resolved Gaussian distribution of the TBR value. The assessment was done for the estimation of the TBR uncertainty due to the nuclear data for entire material compositions and for separate materials: structural, breeder and neutron multipliers. The overall TBR uncertainty for the nuclear data was estimated to be 3~4% for the HCPB and WCLL DEMOs, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies · Nuclear Physics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, 76344 Karlsruhe, Germany

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Perel, R.L. (2014). Upgrading of the MCSEN Sensitivity Software to Comply with the Current Standard of the MCNP-5 Monte Carlo code in: Final Report on Task, 3.1 of the F4E Grant F4E-FPA-168.01.
2. Werner, C.J. (2017). MCNP Users Manual—Code Version 6.2, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL). LA-UR-17-29981.
3. Towards sustainable nuclear energy: Putting nuclear physics to work10.1016/j.anucene.2008.06.004 ↗
4. Uncertainties for criticality-safety benchmarks and keff distributions10.1016/j.anucene.2009.01.018 ↗
5. Nuclear data uncertainty propagation: Perturbation vs. Monte Carlo10.1016/j.anucene.2011.01.026 ↗
6. Nuclear data uncertainty for criticality-safety: Monte Carlo vs. linear perturbation10.1016/j.anucene.2016.01.042 ↗
7. Quantifying TBR uncertainty due to lead nuclear data in HCLL blanketmodelling by the Total Monte-Carlo method10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.03.118 ↗
8. An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.141 ↗
9. An enhanced, near-term HCPB design as driver blanket for the EU DEMO10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.02.037 ↗
10. Recent progress in developing a feasible and integrated conceptual design of the WCLL BB in EUROfusion project10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.03.040 ↗
11. Gliss, K. (2018, May 08). June-2017 DEMO Reference Configuration Model. Available online: https://idm.euro-fusion.org/?uid=2N9Q7K.
12. Improved algorithms and advanced features of CAD to MC conversion tool McCad10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.05.015 ↗
13. Nuclear analyses of solid breeder blanket options for DEMO: Status, challenges and outlook10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.023 ↗
14. Pereslavtsev, P., Bachman, C., and Park, J.H. (2021). DEMO tritium breeding performances with different in-vessel components configurations. Fusion Eng. Des., 166.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112319 ↗
15. The JEFF Team (2018, September 25). JEFF-3.2: Evaluated Nuclear Data Library. Available online: http://www.oecd-nea.org/dbdata/jeff/.
16. Plompen, A.J.M., Cabellos, O., De Saint Jean, C., Fleming, M., Algora, A., Angelone, M., Archier, P., Bauge, E., Bersillon, O., and Blokhin, A. (2020). The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3. Eur. Phys. J. A, 56.10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00141-9 ↗
17. Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation with The TALYS Code System10.1016/j.nds.2012.11.002 ↗
18. TENDL: Complete Nuclear Data Library for Innovative Nuclear Science and Technology10.1016/j.nds.2019.01.002 ↗
19. Bersillon, O., Gunsing, F., Bauge Jacqmin, E., and Leray, S. (2007, January 22–27). TALYS-1.0. Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Nice, France.
20. Park, J.H., and Pereslavtsev, P. (2021). Comparative activation analyses for the HCPB breeding blanket in DEMO. Fusion Eng. Des., 167.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112338 ↗
21. MacFarlane, R.E., Muir, D.W., Boicourt, R.M., Kahler, A.C., Conlin, J.L., and Haeck, W. (2019). The NJOY Nuclear Data Processing System, Version 2016, Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL). LA-UR-17-20093.
22. Goodman, J. (2006, April 20). Principles of Scientific Computing, New York University. Available online: https://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/shelley/Classes/SciComp/GoodmanBook.pdf.
23. Computational approach for evaluation of nuclear data including covariance information10.3938/jkps.59.923 ↗
24. Nuclear data uncertainty propagation to integral responses using SANDY10.1016/j.anucene.2016.11.026 ↗
25. Covariances from Light-Element R-Matrix Analyses10.1016/j.nds.2008.11.015 ↗
26. ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 ↗
27. Hernández, F.A., Pereslavtsev, P., Zhou, G., Kang, Q., D’Amico, S., Neuberger, H., Boccacini, L.V., Kiss, B., Nadasi, G., and Cismondi, F. (2020). Consolidated design of the HCPB Breeding Blanket for the pre-Conceptual Design Phase of the EU DEMO and harmonization with the ITER HCPB TBM program. Fusion Eng. Des., 157.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111614 ↗
28. Moro, F., Colangeli, A., Del Nevo, A., Flammini, D., Mariano, G., Martelli, E., Mozzillo, R., Noce, S., and Villari, R. (2020). Nuclear analyses of the Water cooled lithium lead DEMO reactor. Fusion Eng. Des., 160.10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111833 ↗