Classification of Hyperspectral Images Based on Supervised Sparse Embedded Preserving Projection
Source abstract
Abstract
Dimensionality reduction is an important research area for hyperspectral remote sensing images due to the redundancy of spectral information. Sparsity preserving projection (SPP) is a dimensionality reduction (DR) algorithm based on the l1-graph, which establishes the relations of samples by sparse representation. However, SPP is an unsupervised algorithm that ignores the label information of samples and the objective function of SPP; instead, it only considers the reconstruction error, which means that the classification effect is constrained. In order to solve this problem, this paper proposes a dimensionality reduction algorithm called the supervised sparse embedded preserving projection (SSEPP) algorithm. SSEPP considers the manifold structure information of samples and makes full use of the label information available in order to enhance the discriminative ability of the projection subspace. While maintaining the sparse reconstruction error, the algorithm also minimizes the error between samples of the same class. Experiments were performed on an Indian Pines hyperspectral dataset and HJ1A-HSI remote sensing images from the Zhangjiang estuary in Southeastern China, respectively. The results show that the proposed method effectively improves its classification accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use · Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
Engineering Research Center on Cloud Computing & Internet of Things and E-commerce Intelligence of Fujian Universities, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, Fujian, China
Funding
the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province for Youths, China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. The role of spectral resolution and classifier complexity in the analysis of hyperspectral images of forest areas10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.013 ↗
2. Generation of Spectral–Temporal Response Surfaces by Combining Multispectral Satellite and Hyperspectral UAV Imagery for Precision Agriculture Applications10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2406339 ↗
3. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications10.1109/79.974724 ↗
4. Weighted Sparse Graph Based Dimensionality Reduction for Hyperspectral Images
5. Scaling cut criterion-based discriminant analysis for supervised dimension reduction10.1007/s10115-014-0744-0 ↗
6. Principal component analysis10.1002/wics.101 ↗
7. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems
8. Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2004.842292 ↗
9. A Sparse Representation-Based Binary Hypothesis Model for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Images10.1109/TGRS.2014.2337883 ↗
10. Dimensionality Reduction of Hyperspectral Imagery Using Sparse Graph Learning10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2606578 ↗
11. Scale invariant texture classification via sparse representation10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.016 ↗
12. Sparse Principal Component Analysis10.1198/106186006X113430 ↗
13. Siddiqui, S., Robila, S., Peng, J., and Wang, D. (2008, January 7–11). Sparse Representations for Hyperspectral Data Classification. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779058 ↗
14. Sparsity preserving projections with applications to face recognition10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.005 ↗
15. Dimensionality Reduction of Hyperspectral Images with Sparse Discriminant Embedding10.1109/TGRS.2015.2418203 ↗
16. Graph Embedding and Extensions: A General Framework for Dimensionality Reduction10.1109/TPAMI.2007.250598 ↗
17. Van den Ewout, B., and Friedlander, M.P. (2019, August 30). SPGL1: A Solver for Large-Scale Sparse Reconstruction. Available online: https://friedlander.io/software/spgl1/.
18. Baumgardner, M.F., Biehl, L.L., and Landgrebe, D.A. (2015, September 30). 220 Band AVIRIS Hyperspectral Image Data Set: June 12, 1992 Indian Pine Test Site 3. Available online: https://purr.purdue.edu/publications/1947/1.
19. Total-Variation-Regularized Low-Rank Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Image Restoration10.1109/TGRS.2015.2452812 ↗
20. China Centre for Resources Satellite Data and Application (2015, November 03). HJ-1A/B/C. Available online: http://www.cresda.com/EN/satellite/7117.shtml.
21. Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices10.1109/36.752194 ↗
22. Deering, D.W. (1978). Rangeland Reflectance Characteristics Measured by Aircraft and Spacecraft Sensors. [Ph.D. Thesis, Texas A&M University].