journal article·2022-04-11Open access

Part 2: Stabilization/Containment of Radiological Particle Contamination to Enhance First Responder, Early Phase Worker, and Public Safety

Matthew Magnuson, Terry Stilman, Shannon Serre, John Archer, Ryan James, Xiaoyan Xia, Mitchell Lawrence, Erin Tamargo, Hadas Raveh-Amit, Avi Sharon

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 8

Abstract

The application of stabilization technologies to a radiologically contaminated surface has the potential for reducing the spread of contamination and, as a result, decreasing worker exposure to radiation. Three stabilization technologies, calcium chloride (CaCl2), flame retardant Phos-Chek® MVP-Fx, and Soil2OTM were investigated to evaluate their ability to reduce the resuspension and tracking of radiological contamination during response activities such as vehicle and foot traffic. Concrete pavers, asphalt pavers, and sandy soil walking paths were used as test surfaces, along with simulated fallout material (SFM) tagged with radiostrontium (Sr-85) applied as the contaminant. Radiological activities were measured using gamma spectrometry before and after simulated vehicle operation and foot traffic experiments, conducted with each stabilization technology and without application as a nonstabilized control. These measurements were acquired separately for each combination of surface and vehicle/foot traffic experiment. The resulting data describes the extent of SFM removed from each surface onto the tires or boots, the extent of SFM transferred to adjacent surfaces, and the residual SFM remaining on the tires or boots after each experiment. The type of surface and response worker actions influenced the stabilization results. For instance, when walked over, less than 2% of particles were removed from nonstabilized concrete, 4% from asphalt, and 40% of the particles were removed from the sand surface. By contrast, for vehicle experiments, ~40% of particles were again removed from the sand, but 7% and 15% from concrete and asphalt, respectively. In most cases, the stabilization technologies did provide improved stabilization. The improvement was related to the type of surface, worker actions, and stabilizer; a statistical analysis of these variables is presented. Overall, the results suggest an ability to utilize these technologies during the planning and implementation of response activities involving foot and vehicle traffic. In addition, resuspension of aerosolizable range SFM was monitored during walking path foot traffic experiments, and all stabilizing agents decreased the measured radioactivity, with the Soil2OTM decrease being 3 fold, whereas the CaCl2 and Phos-Chek MVP-Fx surfaces generated no detectable radioactivity. Overall, these results suggest that the stabilization technologies decrease the availability of particles respirable by response workers under these conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Nuclear and radioactivity studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

EPA Office of Research and Development, Homeland Security Materials and Management Division, 26 W Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA

EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth St., SW, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA

EPA Office of Land and Emergency Management, Consequence Management Advisory Division, WJC-N, Washington, DC 20002, USA

Battelle Memorial Institute, 505 King Ave., Columbus, OH 43201, USA

Irregular Warfare Technical Support Directorate, Alexandria, VA 22350, USA

Department of Chemistry, Nuclear Research Centre Negev, P.O. Box 9001, Beer Sheva 8419000, Israel

Environmental Research Unit, Nuclear Research Centre Negev, P.O. Box 9001, Beer Sheva 8419000, Israel

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Wide-area decontamination in an urban environment after radiological dispersion: A review and perspectives10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.014 ↗
2. A review on the effectiveness of street sweeping, washing and dust suppressants as urban PM control methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.025 ↗
3. Re-suspension of road dust: Contribution, assessment and control through dust suppressants—A review10.1007/s13762-018-2001-7 ↗
4. Studies of some measures to reduce road dust emissions from paved roads in Scandinavia10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.022 ↗
5. Review of technologies for preventing secondary transport of soluble and particulate radiological contamination from roadways, roadside vegetation, and adjacent soils10.1016/j.envadv.2020.100003 ↗
6. Preparation and optimization of a novel dust suppressant for construction sites10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001902 ↗
7. Microbial-induced mineralization and cementation of fugitive dust and engineering application10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.016 ↗
8. Effectiveness of road dust suppressants: Insights from particulate matter-related health damage10.1007/s10653-021-00866-6 ↗
9. Parvej, S., Naik, D.L., Sajid, H.U., Kiran, R., Huang, Y., and Thanki, N. (2021). Fugitive Dust Suppression in Unpaved Roads: State of the Art Research Review. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13042399 ↗
10. Preparations and application of dust suppressants from biomass-based materials10.1080/10962247.2021.1942320 ↗
11. Efficacy of oil and gas produced water as a dust suppressant10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149347 ↗
12. Review and prospects of surfactant-enhanced spray dust suppression: Mechanisms and effectiveness10.1016/j.psep.2021.08.037 ↗
13. USEPA (2022, April 09). Wide Area Stabilization of Radiological Particulate Contamination. EPA/600/R-616/067, Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NHSRC&dirEntryId=335602.
14. USEPA (2022, April 09). Technical Report for the Demonstration of Wide Area Radiological Decontamination and Mitigation Technologies for Building Structures and Vehicles. EPA/600/R-616/019, Available online: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NHSRC&dirEntryId=312072.
15. Raveh-Amit, H., Sharon, A., Katra, I., Stilman, T., Serre, S., Archer, J., and Magnuson, M. (2022). Limiting Wind-Induced Resuspension of Radioactively Contaminated Particles to Enhance First Responder, Early Phase Worker and Public Safety—Part 1. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052463 ↗
16. IWTSD (2022, April 09). Irregular Warfare Technical Support Directorate, Available online: https://www.cttso.gov.
17. Clark, D.E., and Cobbin, W.C. (1963). Removal Effectiveness of Simulated Dry Fallout from Paved Areas by Motorized and Vacuumized Street Sweepers, Naval Radiological Defense Lab. Available online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0456495.pdf.
18. Wiltshire, L.L., and Owen, L.W. (1966). Three Tests of Firehosing Technique and Equipment for the Removal of Fallout from Asphalt Streets and Roofing Materials, Naval Radiological Defense Lab. Available online: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0640491.pdf.10.21236/AD0640491 ↗
19. NRC (2022, April 09). Appendix B to Part 20—Annual Limits on Intake (ALIs) and Derived Air Concentrations (DACs) of Radionuclides for Occupational Exposure; Effluent Concentrations; Concentrations for Release to Sewerage, Available online: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part020/part020-appb.html.
20. Analysing the Co-Benefits of transport fleet and fuel policies in reducing PM2.5 and CO2 emissions10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.169 ↗
21. Non-exhaust traffic emissions: Sources, characterization, and mitigation measures10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144440 ↗