Combinatorial optimization of weld sequence by using a surrogate model to mitigate a weld distortion
Source abstract
Abstract
Choosing an optimal sequence from the set of all possible combinations of a weld’s sub-passes is always a challenge for designers. The solution of such combinatorial optimization problems is limited by the available resources. For example, having n sub-passes leads to choosing from 2 n × n! possible combinations of the sub-passes, e.g., 46,080 for n = 6. It is not feasible to choose the optimal sequence by evaluating all possible combinations either experimentally or by simulation models. The purpose of using a surrogate model based on a simulation model is to find the solution in the space of all possible combinations with a significant decrease in computational expenses. In effect, the surrogate model constructs an approximation model from some combinations of solutions of a more expensive model to mimic the behavior of the simulation model as closely as possible but at a much lower computational cost. This surrogate model, then, could be used to approximate the behavior of the other combinations. In this paper, a surrogate model is demonstrated that minimizes the distortion in a pipe girth weld with six sub-passes by analyzing only 14 combinations of sub-passes from total of 48 possible combinations. A comparison between the results of the surrogate model and the full transient FEM analysis all possible combinations shows the accuracy of the algorithm/model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Asadi, M., Goldak, J., Nielsen, J., Zhou, J., Tchernov, S., Downey, D.: Analysis of predicted residual stress in a weld and comparison with experimental data using regression model. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 5(4), 353–364 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s10999-009-9107-510.1007/s10999-009-9107-5 ↗
2. Goldak Technology Inc.: http://www.goldaktec.com/vrweld.html (April 2010)
3. Goldak, J.A., Chakravarti, A., Bibby, M.J.: A New Finite Element Model for Welding Heat Sources. Trans. AIME. 15B, 299–305 (1984)
4. Jones, D., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.: Efficient global optimization of expensive black box functions. J. Glob. Optim. 13, 455492 (1998)10.1023/A:1008306431147 ↗
5. Karlsson, L., Pahkamaa, A., Karlberg, M., Lofstrand, M., Goldak, J., Pavasson, J.: Mechanics of materials and structures—a simulation-driven design approach. Under review to be published. (2010)
6. Pahkamaa, A., Karlsson, L., Pavasson, J., Karlberg, M., Nasstrom, M., Goldak, J.: A method to improve efficiency in welding simulation for simulation driven design. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering , ASME Conference, DETC2010-28664, August 15–18, 2010, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2010)
7. Simo, J.C.: Numerical analysis of classical plasticity. In: Ciarlet, P.G., Lions, J.J. (eds) , Handbook for Numerical Analysis, vol. IV, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)
8. The Lincoln Electric Co. http://www.lincolnelectric.com/knowledge/articles/content/distortion.asp (April 2010)
9. Voutchkov, I., Keane, A., Bhaskar, A., Olsen, T.: Weld sequence optimization: the use of surrogate models for solving sequential combinatorial problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194(30–33), 3535–3551 (2005)10.1016/j.cma.2005.02.003 ↗
10. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogate-model (April 2010)
11. Zienkiewicz, O., Taylor, R.: The Finite Element Method, 4ht edn., vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, London (1989)