journal article·2020-10-23Open access

Transverse Crack Behavior in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement with Basalt Fiber Reinforcement

Yating Zhang, Zhiyi Huang

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 21

Abstract

Continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) is a pavement structure with a high performance and long service life. However, the corrosion of the longitudinal steel can result in a poor bond relationship between the steel and the concrete, affecting the load transfer efficiency between the adjacent panels and being responsible for the development of CRCP distresses. Basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) is corrosion-resistant and has the potential to be used in CRCP. In this paper, the layout of a CRCP test section with BFRP bars constructed on G330 National Road in Zhejiang Province, China, is presented. An analytical model is proposed to predict the crack behavior of CRCP with BFRP reinforcement, with the predicted results are compared to field-measured ones. A sensitivity analysis of the BFRP design parameters on the crack spacing and crack width is conducted as well. The results show that the mean values for field-measured crack spacing and crack width are 4.85 m and 1.30 mm, respectively, which are higher than the results for traditional CRCP with steel due to the lower elastic modulus of BFRP. The analytical predictions agree reasonably well with the crack survey results. The higher the elastic modulus of BFRP, the reinforcement content (with both BFRP spacing and diameter related), and the bond stiffness coefficient between the BFRP and concrete, the less the crack spacing and crack width will be. Given the same or similar reinforcement content, a lower diameter with a smaller spacing is recommended because of its contribution to a smaller crack spacing and width.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China

College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province · Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds · the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Jeon, S.I., Choi, P., and Won, M. (2019). Punchout evaluations and classification of continuously reinforced concrete pavement to improve pavement design. Road Mater. Pavement Des.10.1080/14680629.2019.1701538 ↗
2. Zollinger, D. (1989). Investigation of Punchout Distress in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois].
3. Experimental evaluation of crack width movement of continuously reinforced concrete pavement under environmental load10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.080 ↗
4. Crack Width Measurements in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:9(645) ↗
5. Factors Affecting Crack Width of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement
6. Improved Backcalculation Procedure for Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement10.1177/0361198118758010 ↗
7. A method for evaluating CRCP performance based on edge-loaded FWD test10.1617/s11527-020-01481-0 ↗
8. Optimization of parameters affecting horizontal cracking in continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP)10.1139/cjce-2017-0679 ↗
9. Kohler, E., and Roesler, J. (2006). Accelerated Pavement Testing of Extended Life Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement Sections, Final Report, Transportation Engineering Series No. 141, Illinois Cooperative Highway and Transportation Series No. 289, University of Illinois.
10. Eisa, M., EI-Salakawy, E.F., and Benmokrane, B. (2006, January 24). Finite Element Model for New Continuous Reinforced Concrete Pavement (CRCP) using GFRP Bars. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Montreal, QC, Canada.
11. Steel versus GFRP Rebars?
12. Design of GFRP Reinforced CRCP and its Behavior Sensitivity to Material Property Variations10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.080 ↗
13. Analysis of Shrinkage and Thermal Stresses in Concrete Slabs Reinforced with GFRP Rebars10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000216 ↗
14. Benmokrane, B., Eisa, M., EI-Gamal, S., EI-Salakawy, E., and Thebeau, D. (2008, January 22–24). First Use of GFRP Bars as Reinforcement for Continuous Reinforced Concrete Pavement. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland.
15. Design, construction, and performance of continuously reinforced concrete pavement reinforced with GFRP bars: Case study10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001064 ↗
16. Laboratory test and numerical simulation of bond performance between baslat fiber reinforced polymer rebar and concrete10.1520/JTE20120153 ↗
17. One-Dimensional Model for Analysis of CRC Pavement Growth10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:4(557) ↗
18. An approximate model for continuously reinforced concrete pavement under temperature loading
19. Experience with Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements in Virginia
20. McCullough, B.F., Zollinger, D.G., and Dossey, T. (1999). Evaluation of the Performance of Texas Pavements Made with Different Coarse Aggregates, Research Report 3925-1, Center for Transportation Research, the University of Texas at Austin.
21. Tayabji, S.D., Stephanos, P.J., Gagnon, J.S., and Zollinger, D.G. (1998). Performance of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements Volume II: Field Investigations of CRC Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-94-179, PCS/Law Engineering.
22. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2008). Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A Manual of Practice, AASHTO Designation: MEPDG-1, AASHTO.