Multiple-phase materials topology optimization framework with buckling criteria
Source abstract
Abstract
The primary focus of traditional topological optimization in continuum structures is addressing stress, compliance, and other relevant factors associated with single-phase materials. However, the optimal design of structural buckling performance has gained increasing attention due to its significant economic loss and safety risk. Furthermore, the versatility, lightweight nature, and adjustability of composite multiple-phase materials offer significant potential for application in various fields. Therefore, this paper presents a novel methodology for optimizing multi-phase materials’ design by concurrently incorporating structural buckling criteria and compliance design. Linear buckling analysis is utilized to determine the critical buckling load of the structure, and a buckling constraint is incorporated into the topology optimization model to regulate its buckling performance. A refined material interpolation model scheme is introduced to enhance the algorithm’s robustness and eliminate pseudo-eigenmode in buckling analysis. The numerical results demonstrate that the final topology optimization design exhibits distinct and discernible boundaries for the topological configurations of multiple-phase materials. Moreover, it is possible to effectively regulate the buckling property while minimizing any compromise on stiffness.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Alacoque, L., Watkins, R.T., Tamijani, A.Y.: Stress-based and robust topology optimization for thermoelastic multi-material periodic microstructures. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11374910.1016/j.cma.2021.113749 ↗
2. Allaire, G., Jouve, F., Maillot, H.: Topology optimization for minimum stress design with the homogenization method. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 28, 87–89 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0442-810.1007/s00158-004-0442-8 ↗
3. Banh, T.T., Lee, D.: Topology optimization of multi-directional variable thickness thin plate with multiple materials. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 59(5), 1503–1520 (2019)10.1007/s00158-018-2143-8 ↗
4. Bendsøe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch. Appl. Mech. 69, 635–654 (1999)10.1007/s004190050248 ↗
5. Bruggi, M., Duysinx, P.: Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and stress constraints. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 46(3), 369–384 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0759-710.1007/s00158-012-0759-7 ↗
6. Chu, S., Xiao, M., Gao, L., Li, H.: A level set-based method for stress-constrained multimaterial topology optimization of minimizing a global measure of stress. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 117(7), 800–818 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.597910.1002/nme.5979 ↗
7. Clausen, A., Aage, N., Sigmund, O.: Exploiting additive manufacturing infill in topology optimization for improved buckling load. Engineering 2(2), 250–257 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Eng.2016.02.00610.1016/j.Eng.2016.02.006 ↗
8. da Silva, G.A., Beck, A.T., Sigmund, O.: Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms considering stress constraints, manufacturing uncertainty and geometric nonlinearity. Comput. Methods Appl Mech Eng 365, 112972 (2020)10.1016/j.cma.2020.112972 ↗
9. Dou, S.: A projection approach for topology optimization of porous structures through implicit local volume control. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62, 835–850 (2020)10.1007/s00158-020-02539-x ↗
10. Du, J., Olhoff, N.: Topological design of freely vibrating continuum structures for maximum values of simple and multiple eigenfrequencies and frequency gaps. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 34(2), 91–110 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0101-y10.1007/s00158-007-0101-y ↗
11. Dunning, P.D., Ovtchinnikov, E., Scott, J., Kim, H.A.: Level-set topology optimization with many linear buckling constraints using an efficient and robust eigensolver. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 107(12), 1029–1053 (2016)10.1002/nme.5203 ↗
12. Ferrari, F., Sigmund, O.: Revisiting topology optimization with buckling constraints. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 59(5), 1401–1415 (2019)10.1007/s00158-019-02253-3 ↗
13. Ferrari, F., Sigmund, O.: A new generation 99 line Matlab code for compliance topology optimization and its extension to 3D. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62(4), 2211–2228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02629-w10.1007/s00158-020-02629-w ↗
14. Ferrari, F., Sigmund, O., Guest, J.K.: Topology optimization with linearized buckling criteria in 250 lines of matlab. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 63(6), 3045–3066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02854-x10.1007/s00158-021-02854-x ↗
15. Gan, N., Wang, Q.: Topology optimization design for buckling analysis related to the size effect. Math. Mech. Solids (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286521106660710.1177/10812865211066607 ↗
16. Gan, N., Wang, Q.: Topology optimization of multiphase materials with dynamic and static characteristics by BESO method. Adv. Eng. Softw. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.10292810.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102928 ↗
17. Gao, X., Ma, H.: Topology optimization of continuum structures under buckling constraints. Comput. Struct. 157, 142–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.02010.1016/j.compstruc.2015.05.020 ↗
18. Ghasemi, H., Brighenti, R., Zhuang, X., Muthu, J., Rabczuk, T.: Optimization of fiber distribution in fiber reinforced composite by using NURBS functions. Comput. Mater. Sci. 83, 463–473 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.03210.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.032 ↗
19. Ghasemi, H., Park, H.S., Rabczuk, T.: A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 332, 47–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.00510.1016/j.cma.2017.12.005 ↗
20. Ghasemi, H., Park, H.S., Alajlan, N., Rabczuk, T.: A computational framework for design and optimization of flexoelectric materials. Int. J. Comput. Methods 17(01), 1850097 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1142/s021987621850097410.1142/s0219876218500974 ↗
21. Groen, J.P., Wu, J., Sigmund, O.: Homogenization-based stiffness optimization and projection of 2D coated structures with orthotropic infill. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 349, 722–742 (2019)10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.031 ↗
22. Hoang, V.-N., Tran, P., Vu, V.-T., Nguyen-Xuan, H.: Design of lattice structures with direct multiscale topology optimization. Compos. Struct. 252, 112718 (2020)10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112718 ↗
23. Jung, J., Hyun, J., Goo, S., Wang, S.: An efficient design sensitivity analysis using element energies for topology optimization of a frequency response problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 296, 196–210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.06.01910.1016/j.cma.2015.06.019 ↗
24. Kundu, R.D., Li, W., Zhang, X.S.: Multimaterial stress-constrained topology optimization with multiple distinct yield criteria. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 54, 101716 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2022.10171610.1016/j.eml.2022.101716 ↗
25. Li, Y., Xie, Y.M.: Evolutionary topology optimization for structures made of multiple materials with different properties in tension and compression. Compos. Struct. 259, 113497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11349710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113497 ↗
26. Lian, H., Christiansen, A.N., Tortorelli, D.A., Sigmund, O., Aage, N.: Combined shape and topology optimization for minimization of maximal von Mises stress. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 55(5), 1541–1557 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1656-x10.1007/s00158-017-1656-x ↗
27. Ooms, T., Vantyghem, G., Thienpont, T., Van Coile, R., De Corte, W.: Compliance-based topology optimization of structural components subjected to thermo-mechanical loading. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 66(6), 126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03563-310.1007/s00158-023-03563-3 ↗
28. Rahmatalla, S., Swan, C.C.: Continuum topology optimization of buckling-sensitive structures. AIAA J. 41(6), 1180–1189 (2003)10.2514/2.2062 ↗
29. Roper, S.W.K., Lee, H., Huh, M., Kim, I.Y.: Simultaneous isotropic and anisotropic multi-material topology optimization for conceptual-level design of aerospace components. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 64(1), 441–456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02893-410.1007/s00158-021-02893-4 ↗
30. Sigmund, O., Torquato, S.: Design of materials with extreme thermal expansion using a three-phase topology optimization method. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45(6), 1037–1067 (1997)10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00114-7 ↗
31. Svanberg, K.: The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 24(2), 359–373 (1987)10.1002/nme.1620240207 ↗
32. Thomsen, C.R., Wang, F., Sigmund, O.: Buckling strength topology optimization of 2D periodic materials based on linearized bifurcation analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 339, 115–136 (2018)10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.031 ↗
33. Wang, Y., Xu, H., Pasini, D.: Multiscale isogeometric topology optimization for lattice materials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 316, 568–585 (2017)10.1016/j.cma.2016.08.015 ↗
34. Xu, S., Liu, J., Zou, B., Li, Q., Ma, Y.: Stress constrained multi-material topology optimization with the ordered SIMP method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 373, 113453 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11345310.1016/j.cma.2020.113453 ↗
35. Yi, B., Zhou, Y., Yoon, G.H., Saitou, K.: Topology optimization of functionally-graded lattice structures with buckling constraints. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 354, 593–619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.05510.1016/j.cma.2019.05.055 ↗