Predicting Visual Comfort in Art Galleries: The Interactive Influence of Painting Tones and Illuminance
Source abstract
Abstract
This study uniquely integrates physiological and subjective data to predict comfort. To optimize lighting conditions in art galleries, this study investigates the interactive effects of painting tones (cool, medium, warm) and illuminance levels (50, 150, 300 lx) on visual comfort. Using decorative paintings as experimental stimuli, 30 participants were exposed to nine distinct lighting scenarios. Subjective questionnaires and eye-tracking data were collected to establish five predictive models. An additional cohort of 10 participants served as an external validation set. Results indicate that the interaction between tone and illuminance exerts a significant influence on comfort. The optimal combinations identified were cool tone + 50 lx, warm tone + 150 lx, and medium tone + 300 lx. Among the models, XGBoost demonstrated superior predictive performance (R2 = 0.928 in the test set; R2 = 0.884 in external validation). SHAP analysis revealed that the coefficient of variation in pupil diameter was the most critical predictor, followed by fixation count and related features. Both global and individual feature contributions to comfort were elucidated, offering a robust scientific foundation for the precise regulation of lighting environments in art galleries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design · Color Science and Applications · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Institute of Photonics, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
International Academy of Arts, Dalian University of Foreign Languages, Dalian 116044, China
Funding
Liaoning Provincial Science and Technology Program Project
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.062 ↗
2. Cirrincione, L., La Gennusa, M., Peri, G., Rizzo, G., and Scaccianoce, G. (2024). Indoor Parameters of Museum Buildings for Guaranteeing Artworks Preservation and People’s Comfort: Compatibilities, Constraints, and Suggestions. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17081968 ↗
3. Improving lighting efficiency in existing art museums: A case study10.1108/F-10-2019-0108 ↗
4. The physical environment in museums and its effects on visitors’ satisfaction10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.004 ↗
5. Yao, C., Tian, T., Gao, C., Zhao, S., and Liu, Q. (2022). Visual performance of painting colors based on psychological factors. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966571 ↗
6. The Same of Beauty of Vision: The Common Research of Photography and Painting10.33258/siasat.v6i2.96 ↗
7. Hosap, W., Khundam, C., Preeyawongsakul, P., Vorachart, V., and Noël, F. (2023). The Influence of Light and Color in Digital Paintings of Environmental Issues on Emotions and Cognitions. Informatics, 10.10.3390/informatics10010026 ↗
8. Hathibelagal, A.R. (2023). The impact of display saturation on visual search performance in congenital colour vision deficiency. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0290782 ↗
9. Jaglarz, A. (2024). Color as a Key Factor in Creating Sustainable Living Spaces for Seniors. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162310251 ↗
10. The impact of varied correlated color temperatures on visual comfort in museum exhibitions: Integrating physiological and subjective assessments10.1080/13467581.2024.2342856 ↗
11. Colour and lighting in hospital design10.1016/j.optlastec.2005.06.040 ↗
12. Visual Comfort with LED Lighting10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.082 ↗
13. Wang, S., and Zhao, J. (2022). New prospectives on light adaptation of visual system research with the emerging knowledge on non-image-forming effect. Front. Built Environ., 8.10.3389/fbuil.2022.1019460 ↗
14. Pupillometry: Psychology, Physiology, and Function10.5334/joc.18 ↗
15. Light, vision and illumination: The interaction revisited10.1177/1477153515572240 ↗
16. Speeded classification of visual events is sensitive to crossmodal intensity correspondence10.1037/xhp0001183 ↗
17. Photocatalysis: An effective tool for photodegradation of dyes—A review10.1007/s11356-021-16389-7 ↗
18. The influence of light and relative humidity on the formation of epsomite in cadmium yellow and French ultramarine modern oil paints10.1186/s40494-021-00569-2 ↗
19. (2009). Museum Lighting Design Specification (Standard No. GB/T 23863-2009).
20. Lighting quantity indexes for lighting traditional Chinese paintings based on pigments protection and substrates protection in museums10.1364/OE.429923 ↗
21. Sporters’ visual comfort assessment in gymnasium based on subjective evaluation & objective physiological response10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109678 ↗
22. Zhao, X., Lin, L., Guo, X., Wang, Z., and Li, R. (2025). Evaluation of Rural Visual Landscape Quality Based on Multi-Source Affective Computing. Appl. Sci., 15.10.20944/preprints202503.2190.v1 ↗
23. Towards an integration of visual comfort and lighting impression: A field study within higher educational buildings10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108989 ↗
24. Measuring the subjective response to interior lighting: Paired comparisons and semantic differential scaling10.1191/1365782803li073oa ↗
25. Zheng, F., Hou, F., Chen, R., Mei, J., Huang, P., Chen, B., and Wang, Y. (2021). Investigation of the Relationship Between Subjective Symptoms of Visual Fatigue and Visual Functions. Front. Neurosci., 15.10.3389/fnins.2021.686740 ↗
26. Reliability of standard pupillometry practice in neurocritical care: An observational, double-blinded study10.1186/s13054-016-1239-z ↗
27. Publication Guidelines and Recommendations for Pupillary Measurement in Psychophysiological Studies10.1111/psyp.14035 ↗
28. Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., and Marchetti, A. (2012). When Art Moves the Eyes: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0037285 ↗
29. The display makes a difference: A mobile eye tracking study on the perception of art before and after a museum’s rearrangement
30. Dai, Y., Ren, Y., Li, H., and Wang, M. (2025). Evaluating Art Exhibition Spaces Through Space Syntax and Multimodal Physiological Data. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15111776 ↗
31. Ma, G., and Pan, X. (2021). Research on a Visual Comfort Model Based on Individual Preference in China through Machine Learning Algorithm. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13147602 ↗
32. Zagar, K., Kurent, B., Bohinc, U., Legat, A., and Rebec, K.M. (2024, January 12–14). The Development of Personalized Visual Comfort Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Sustainable Smart Lighting World Conference & Expo (LS24), Eindhoven, The Netherlands.10.1109/LS2463127.2024.10881120 ↗
33. Kang, S.Y., Cho, J.E., and Jun, H.J. (2025). EEG-Driven Personal Comfort Model for Cognitive Efficiency in Human-Centric Environments. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15183339 ↗
34. Daylighting Museum Galleries: A Review of Performance Criteria10.1177/096032710003200311 ↗
35. The Research on Carpet Design Development As a Homage to William Morris
36. The impact of indoor environmental quality on work productivity in university open-plan research offices10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.003 ↗
37. Impact of Illumination Correlated Color Temperature, Background Lightness, and Painting Color Content on Color Appearance and Appreciation of Paintings
38. Effects of Light Source Spectrum and Background Colour on the Perception of Paintings10.1177/1477153519847254 ↗
39. Near Infrared Spectroscopic Reflectance Imaging: A New Tool in Art Conservation10.1016/S0924-2031(01)00145-X ↗
40. Indicators for lighting Chinese paintings in museums based on the protection standards and color preferences10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113610 ↗
41. Wu, F., Zhao, Y., and Zhang, H. (2022). Ocular Autonomic Nervous System: An Update from Anatomy to Physiological Functions. Vision, 6.10.3390/vision6010006 ↗
42. Jebb, A.T., Ng, V., and Tay, L. (2021). A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019. Front. Psychol., 12.10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547 ↗
43. Imbalance: Oversampling algorithms for imbalanced classification in R10.1016/j.knosys.2018.07.035 ↗
44. Feng, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Qin, X., and Liu, T. (2022). Exploring the Influence of the Illumination and Painting Tone of Art Galleries on Visual Comfort. Photonics, 9.10.3390/photonics9120981 ↗
45. Subjective and objective survey of office lighting: Effects on alertness, comfort, satisfaction, and safety
46. Talebi, S. (2019). Modeling Autonomic Pupillary Responses from External Stimuli Using Machine Learning. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res., 20.10.26717/BJSTR.2019.20.003446 ↗
47. Bao, J., Song, X., Li, Y., Bai, Y., and Zhou, Q. (2021). Effect of lighting illuminance and colour temperature on mental workload in an office setting. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-94795-0 ↗
48. Arguelles-Prieto, R., Madrid, J.A., Rol, M.A., and Bonmati-Carrion, M.A. (2021). Correlated color temperature and light intensity: Complementary features in non-visual light field. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0254171 ↗
49. Color rendering evaluation model for lighting of traditional Chinese freehand brushwork paintings in museums10.1038/s40494-025-01966-7 ↗
50. Zhao, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, T., Liu, T., Yu, H., and Wang, H. (2025). Impact of Lighting Conditions on Emotional and Neural Responses of International Students in Cultural Exhibition Halls. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15142507 ↗
51. Almustanyir, A., Almutairi, M.S., Aldrwish, A., Hasrod, N., Alqhtani, B.A., Alqahtani, T., Alanazi, M., Alghamdi, M., Almutleb, E., and Alabdulkader, B. (2025). The Effect of Pupil Size on Cone Contrast Sensitivity. Life, 15.10.3390/life15050801 ↗
52. Li, R., Yuizono, T., and Li, X. (2022). Affective computing of multi-type urban public spaces to analyze emotional quality using ensemble learning-based classification of multi-sensor data. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0269176 ↗
53. Interpretable machine learning for maximum corrosion depth and influence factor analysis10.1038/s41529-023-00324-x ↗
54. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845 ↗
55. Mahmood, M.S., Ali, T., Inam, I., Qureshi, M.Z., Zaidi, S.S.A., Alqurashi, M., Ahmed, H., Adnan, M., and Hotak, A.H. (2025). Machine learning prediction and explainability analysis of high strength glass powder concrete using SHAP PDP and ICE. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-04762-2 ↗
56. Applications of Machine Learning in Spectroscopy10.1080/05704928.2020.1859525 ↗