Trajectory Tracking Control Method via Simulation for Quadrotor UAVs Based on Hierarchical Decision Dual-Threshold Adaptive Switching
Source abstract
Abstract
In complex 3D maneuvering tasks (e.g., post-disaster rescue, urban operations, and infrastructure inspection), the trajectories that quadrotors need to track are often complex—containing both gentle flight phases and highly maneuverable trajectory segments. Under such trajectory tracking tasks with the composite characteristics of “gentle-high maneuvering”, quadrotors face challenges of limited onboard computing resources and short endurance, requiring a balance between trajectory tracking accuracy, computational efficiency, and energy consumption. To address this problem, this paper proposes a lightweight trajectory tracking control method based on hierarchical decision-making and dual-threshold adaptive switching. Inspired by the biological “prediction–reflection” mechanism, this method designs a dual-threshold collaborative early warning switching architecture of “prediction layer–confirmation layer”: The prediction layer dynamically assesses potential risks based on trajectory curvature and jerk, while the confirmation layer confirms in real time the stability risks through an attitude-angular velocity composite index. Only when both exceed the thresholds, it switches from low-energy-consuming Euler angle control to high-precision geometric control. Simulation experiments show that in four typical trajectories (straight-line rapid turn, high-speed S-shaped, anti-interference composite, and narrow space figure-eight), compared with pure geometric control, this method reduces position error by 19.5%, decreases energy consumption by 45.9%, and shortens CPU time by 28%. This study not only optimizes device performance by improving trajectory tracking accuracy while reducing onboard computational load, but also reduces energy consumption to extend UAV endurance, and simultaneously enhances anti-disturbance capability, thereby improving its operational capability to respond to emergencies in complex environments. Overall, this study provides a feasible solution for the efficient and safe flight of resource-constrained onboard platforms in multi-scenario complex environments in the future and has broad application and expansion potential.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
General Department IV, Xi’an Institute of Applied Optics, Xi’an 710072, China
School of Artificial Intelligence, Optics and Electronics (iOPEN), Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Corbetta, M., Banerjee, P., Okolo, W., Gorospe, G., and Luchinsky, D.G. (2019, January 14). Real-Time UAV Trajectory Prediction for Safety Monitoring in Low-Altitude Airspace. Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum 2019, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2019-3514 ↗
2. Integration of Adaptive Control and Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Control and Learning10.1109/TAC.2023.3290037 ↗
3. Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learning
4. Zeng, Q., Chen, Z., Li, C., Chen, D., Zhou, S., Wei, G., and Bui, T. (2025). A Method for Maximizing UAV Deployment and Reducing Energy Consumption Based on Strong Weiszfeld and Steepest Descent with Goldstein Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15179798 ↗
5. Control Algorithms for UAVs: A Comprehensive Survey
6. Nonlinear Disturbance Observer Based Geometric Control of Quadrotors10.1002/asjc.2318 ↗
7. A Class of Adaptive Extended State Observers for Nonlinear Disturbed Systems10.1109/TIE.2015.2448060 ↗
8. Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learning10.1007/s10994-021-05961-4 ↗
9. Fault-Tolerant Adaptive Learning Control for Quadrotor UAVs With the Time-Varying CoG and Full-State Constraints10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3071094 ↗
10. Global Formulation of an Extended Kalman Filter on SE(3) for Geometric Control of a Quadrotor UAV10.1007/s10846-017-0525-6 ↗
11. Learning Agile and Dynamic Motor Skills for Legged Robots10.1126/scirobotics.aau5872 ↗
12. Composite Backstepping Consensus for Higher-Order Nonlinear Multi-Agent Systems10.1109/TCYB.2017.2720680 ↗
13. Variation-Based Linearization of Nonlinear Systems Evolving on SO(3) and S210.1109/ACCESS.2015.2477880 ↗
14. Outracing Champion Gran Turismo Drivers with Deep RL10.1038/s41586-021-04357-7 ↗
15. Robust H∞ Attitude Tracking Control of a Quadrotor UAV on SO(3) via Variation-Based Linearization and Interval Matrix Approach10.1016/j.isatra.2018.11.015 ↗
16. Geometric Attitude Tracking Control of Quadrotor UAVs with Adaptive Extended State Observers10.1016/j.isatra.2025.02.025 ↗
17. Lotfi, B., Goharimanesh, M., and Huang, L. (2015, January 7–11). Modelling and Control of Quadrotor Maneuvers with Variations of Center of Gravity (COG). Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Busan, Republic of Korea.10.1109/AIM.2015.7222766 ↗
18. Adaptive Control of a Quadrotor with Dynamic Changes in the Center of Gravity10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.02564 ↗
19. Coursey, A., Hamadeh, H., and Johnson, E.N. (2024, January 8–9). Hybrid Control Framework of UAVs under Varying Wind and Payload Conditions. Proceedings of the 2024 American Control Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.23919/ACC60939.2024.10645000 ↗
20. Event-Triggered Adaptive Tracking Control for Multiagent Systems with Unknown Disturbances10.1109/TCYB.2018.2869084 ↗
21. Cooperative Decision-Making for CAVs at Unsignalized Intersections: A MARL Approach With Attention and Hierarchical Game Priors10.1109/TITS.2024.3503092 ↗
22. Moali, O., Mezghani, D., Mami, A., Oussar, A., and Nemra, A. (2024). UAV Trajectory Tracking Using Proportional-Integral-Derivative-Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller with Genetic Algorithm Parameter Tuning. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24206678 ↗
23. Geometric-Based Prescribed Performance Control for Unmanned Aerial Manipulator System under Model Uncertainties and External Disturbances10.1016/j.isatra.2021.11.006 ↗
24. Neuroadaptive Fault-Tolerant Control of Quadrotor UAVs: A More Affordable Solution10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2876130 ↗
25. Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Trajectory Tracking Control of Quadrotor VTOL Aircraft with Elliptic Membership Functions10.1109/TMECH.2016.2614672 ↗
26. Aerial Manipulation: A Literature Review10.1109/LRA.2018.2808541 ↗
27. Estimation, Control, and Planning for Autonomous Aerial Transportation10.1109/TIE.2016.2598321 ↗
28. Trajectory Tracking with Prescribed Performance for Underactuated Underwater Vehicles under Model Uncertainties and External Disturbances10.1109/TCST.2016.2555247 ↗
29. Robust Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control of Mobile Robots with Varying Center of Mass10.1109/TIE.2017.2740845 ↗
30. Wang, Y., Li, J., Yang, X., and Peng, Q. (2025). UAV–Ground Vehicle Collaborative Delivery in Emergency Response: A Review of Key Technologies and Future Trends. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15179803 ↗
31. Mellinger, D., and Kumar, V. (2011, January 9–13). Minimum Snap Trajectory Generation and Control for Quadrotors. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICRA.2011.5980409 ↗
32. Autonomous Perception-Planning-Control Strategy Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
33. Sun, Z., Chen, Y., and Xu, M. (2025, January 3–6). Real-Time Path Planning for Gas Leak Monitoring Based on PPO Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE 20th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Yantai, China.10.1109/ICIEA65512.2025.11148757 ↗
34. Lee, T., Dong, E.C., and Eun, Y. (2017, January 24–26). Attitude Control Strategies Overcoming the Topological Obstruction on SO(3). Proceedings of the 2017 American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.10.23919/ACC.2017.7963283 ↗
35. An Internal Model For Sensorimotor Integration10.1126/science.7569931 ↗