Optimal Heliocentric Orbit Raising of CubeSats with a Monopropellant Electrospray Multimode Propulsion System
Source abstract
Abstract
A Multimode Propulsion System (MPS) is an innovative spacecraft thruster concept that integrates two or more propulsion modes sharing the same type of propellant. A spacecraft equipped with an MPS can potentially combine the advantages of continuous-thrust electric propulsion and medium-to-high-thrust chemical propulsion within a single vehicle, while reducing the overall mass compared to traditional configurations where each propulsion system uses a different propellant. This feature makes the MPS concept particularly attractive for small spacecraft, such as the well-known CubeSats, which have now reached a high level of technological maturity and are employed not only in geocentric environments but also in interplanetary missions as support elements for conventional deep-space vehicles. Within the MPS framework, a Monopropellant-Electrospray Multimode Propulsion System (MEMPS) represents a specific type of micropropulsion technology that enables a single miniaturized propulsion unit to operate in either catalytic-chemical or electrospray-electric mode. This paper investigates the flight performance of a MEMPS-equipped CubeSat in a classical circle-to-circle orbit-raising (or lowering) maneuver within a two-dimensional mission scenario. Specifically, the study derives the optimal guidance law that allows the CubeSat to follow a transfer trajectory optimized either for minimum flight time or minimum propellant consumption, starting from a parking orbit of assigned radius and targeting a final circular orbit. Numerical simulations indicate that a heliocentric orbit raising, increasing the initial solar distance by 20%, can be achieved with a flight time of approximately 11 months and a propellant consumption slightly below 6 kg. The proposed method is applied to a heliocentric case study, although the procedure can be readily extended to geocentric transfer missions, which represent a more common application scenario for current CubeSat-based scientific missions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Space Satellite Systems and Control · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy
Institute of Space Systems, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Review of multimode space propulsion10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100627 ↗
2. Low-Thrust Gravity-Assist Trajectory Design Using Optimal Multimode Propulsion Models10.2514/1.G005750 ↗
3. Time-Optimal Trajectories to Circumsolar Space Using Solar Electric Propulsion10.1016/j.asr.2012.09.012 ↗
4. NSTAR Xenon Ion Thruster on Deep Space 1: Ground and flight tests10.1063/1.1150468 ↗
5. Modeling grid erosion in the NEXT ion thruster using the CEX2D and CEX3D codes10.1007/s44205-023-00043-0 ↗
6. Combined Chemical–Electric Propulsion for a Stand-Alone Mars CubeSat10.2514/1.A34519 ↗
7. Hybrid electric chemical propulsion10.2514/3.22855 ↗
8. Hybrid solar sail and solar electric propulsion for novel Earth observation missions10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.06.007 ↗
9. Artificial Three-Body Equilibria for Hybrid Low-Thrust Propulsion10.2514/1.36125 ↗
10. Tradeoff performance of hybrid low-thrust propulsion system10.2514/1.30298 ↗
11. Indirect optimal control techniques for multimode propulsion mission design10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.07.020 ↗
12. Generic Smoothing for Optimal Bang-Off-Bang Spacecraft Maneuvers10.2514/1.G003604 ↗
13. Propulsion for CubeSats10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.048 ↗
14. Alnaqbi, S., Darfilal, D., and Swei, S.S.M. (2024). Propulsion technologies for CubeSats. Aerospace, 11.10.3390/aerospace11070502 ↗
15. Klesh, A., Clement, B., Colley, C., Essmiller, J., Forgette, D., Krajewski, J., Marinan, A., and Martin-Mur, T. (2018, January 4–9). MarCO: Early operations of the first CubeSats to Mars 2018. Proceedings of the Small Satellite Conference (SmallSat 2018), Logan, UT, USA.
16. Tsay, M., Model, J., Barcroft, C., Frongillo, J., Zwahlen, J., and Feng, C. (2017, January 8–12). Integrated testing of iodine bit-3 rf ion propulsion system for 6u cubesat applications. Proceedings of the 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
17. Lunar SmallSat Missions with Chemical-Electrospray Multimode Propulsion10.2514/1.A35820 ↗
18. Rovey, J.L., and Koizumi, H. (2023). Dual-mode propulsion systems for SmallSats. Next Generation CubeSats and SmallSats, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-824541-5.00011-X ↗
19. Assessment of Multimode Spacecraft Micropropulsion Systems10.2514/1.A33649 ↗
20. Multimodal electrospray thruster for small spacecraft: Design and experimental characterization10.1007/s44205-024-00075-0 ↗
21. Bruno, A.R., Schroeder, M.R., and Lozano, P.C. (2022, January 3–7). Characterization of Electrospray Thrusters with HAN-Based Monopropellants for Multimode Propulsion Applications. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2022-2490 ↗
22. Walker, R., Koschny, D., and Bramanti, C. (2016, January 6–11). Design and Development of a Multi-Mode Monopropellant Electrospray. Proceedings of the Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA.
23. Assessment of imidazole-based ionic liquids as dual-mode spacecraft propellants10.2514/1.B34341 ↗
24. Spence, D., Ehrbar, E., Rosenbald, N., Demmons, N., Roy, T., Hoffman, S., Williams, W.D., Tsay, M., Zwahlen, J., and Hohman, K. (2013, January 10–12). Electrospray Propulsion Systems for Small Satellites and Satlets. Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2013-5329 ↗
25. Marrese-Reading, C., Arestie, S., and Landau, D. (2023, January 5–10). Electrospray Thrusters for Smallsat Missions. Proceedings of the Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA.
26. Falcone, G., Engel, D.L., Cortinovis, M., Ryan, C.N., Rovey, J.L., Putnam, Z.R., Berg, S., and Lembeck, M. (2022, January 5–12). Mission Performance Assessment of Multimode Propulsion for Satellite Servicing Applications. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843839 ↗
27. Lunar flyby transfers between libration point orbits10.1093/mnras/stx505 ↗
28. Near-Earth Asteroid Surveillance Constellation in the Sun-Venus Three-Body System10.34133/2022/9864937 ↗
29. Walker, R., Koschny, D., and Bramanti, C. (2017, January 30). Miniaturised Asteroid Remote Geophysical Observer (M-ARGO): A stand-alone deep space CubeSat system for low cost science and exploration missions. Proceedings of the 6th Interplanetary CubeSat Workshop, Cambridge, UK.
30. Deep-space CubeSats: Thinking inside the box10.1093/astrogeo/aty232 ↗
31. Envelop of reachable asteroids by M-ARGO CubeSat10.1016/j.asr.2021.02.031 ↗
32. Minimum-Time Space Missions with Solar Electric Propulsion10.1016/j.ast.2010.09.003 ↗
33. Berg, S.P., and Rovey, J.L. (2013, January 6–10). Assessment of high-power electric multi-mode spacecraft propulsion concepts. Proceedings of the 33th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
34. Lyne, C.T., Rovey, J., and Berg, S.P. (2021, January 9–11). Monopropellant-Electrospray Multimode Thruster Testing Results: Electrospray Mode. Proceedings of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum, Virtual Event.10.2514/6.2021-3439 ↗
35. Leiter, H., Altmann, C., Porst, J., Lauer, D., Berger, M., and Rath, M. (2017, January 8–12). Six decades of thrust-the Ariane Group radiofrequency ion thrusters and systems family. Proceedings of the 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
36. Spacecraft trajectory optimization: A review of models, objectives, approaches and solutions10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.07.007 ↗
37. A review of optimization techniques in spacecraft flight trajectory design10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.003 ↗
38. Bryson, A.E., and Ho, Y.C. (1975). Applied Optimal Control, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. Chapter 2.
39. Stengel, R.F. (1994). Optimal Control and Estimation, Dover Books on Mathematics, Dover Publications, Inc.
40. The MATLAB ODE Suite10.1137/S1064827594276424 ↗
41. Yang, W.Y., Cao, W., Kim, J., Park, K.W., Park, H.H., Joung, J., Ro, J.S., Hong, C.H., and Im, T. (2020). Applied Numerical Methods Using MATLAB, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Chapter 1.10.1002/9781119626879 ↗
42. Quarta, A.A. (2024). Initial costate approximation for rapid orbit raising with very low propulsive acceleration. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14031124 ↗
43. Ross, I.M. (2015). A Primer on Pontryagin’s Principle in Optimal Control, Collegiate Publishers. Chapter 2.
44. Prussing, J.E. (2010). Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization, Cambridge University Press. Chapter 2.
45. Prussing, J.E. (2018). Optimal Spacecraft Trajectories, Oxford University Press. Chapter 4.10.1093/oso/9780198811084.001.0001 ↗
46. Quarta, A.A. (2025). Preliminary Trajectory Analysis of CubeSats with Electric Thrusters in Nodal Flyby Missions for Asteroid Exploration. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17030513 ↗
47. Quarta, A.A. (2024). Continuous-Thrust Circular Orbit Phasing Optimization of Deep Space CubeSats. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14167059 ↗