Assessment of Soil Conditions with Rayleigh Ellipticity Analysis and Microtremor Methods at Strong Motion Stations in Diyarbakır (Türkiye)
Source abstract
Abstract
This article presents the results of single-station microtremor measurements conducted in Diyarbakır Province. To develop shear wave velocity profiles and determine dynamic soil parameters for the region, measurements were carried out at eight strong-motion accelerometer stations located within the provincial boundaries and operated by the Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD). Data were recorded in three components over a 30 min period. For analysis, the Rayleigh wave ellipticity method was employed in combination with inversion techniques, along with the Horizontal-to-Vertical (H/V) Spectral Ratio method. These analyses yielded shear wave velocity profiles for each station, from which Vs values, predominant ground frequency, and amplification factors were obtained. Based on the average shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m (Vs30), ground classifications were made. In the final stage, earthquake acceleration records were analyzed and compared with the microtremor results. The findings indicate that the predominant frequency values range from 3.64 to 16.61 Hz, while ground amplification values vary between 1.20 and 2.85. The lowest Vs30 value was 555 m/s, and the highest damage vulnerability index (Kg), calculated from the H/V analysis, was 1.90.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Türkiye
Çan Vocational School, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 17400 Canakkale, Türkiye
Funding
Dicle University Natural and Applied Sciences
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Investigation of the seismicity of East Anatolian fault zone (EAFZ) according to Poisson and Exponential distribution models
2. Structural damage evaluation of mosques and minarets in Adıyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107345 ↗
3. Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 202310.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107405 ↗
4. Investigation of earthquake sequence and stress transfer in the Eastern Anatolia Fault Zone by Coulomb stress analysis10.55730/1300-0985.1898 ↗
5. Fault modeling around southern Anatolia using the aftershock sequence of the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw= 7.7 and Mw= 7.6) and an interpretation of potential field data
6. Akar, F., Işık, E., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., and İzol, R. (2024). Geotechnical and structural damages caused by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in Gölbaşı (Adıyaman). Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052165 ↗
7. Işık, E., Avcil, F., İzol, R., Büyüksaraç, A., Bilgin, H., Harirchian, E., and Arkan, E. (2024). Field reconnaissance and earthquake vulnerability of the RC buildings in Adıyaman during 2023 Türkiye earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14072860 ↗
8. Isik, E., Avcil, F., Buyuksarac, A., Arkan, E., and Harirchian, E. (2025). Impact of Local Soil Conditions on the Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Structures: In the Context of the 2023 Kahramanmaras Earthquakes. Appl. Sci. Basel, 15.10.3390/app15052389 ↗
9. Işık, E., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., and Arkan, E. (2025). Comparative analysis of target displacements in RC Buildings for 2023 Türkiye earthquakes. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15074014 ↗
10. Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation?
11. Siyahi, B., and Selcuk, M.E. (2005, January 23–25). Use of Microtremor Measurements in Determining Local Soil Conditions: Adapazarı Example. Proceedings of the Kocaeli 2005 Earthquake Symposium, Kocaeli, Turkey.
12. Assessment of potential seismic hazard and site effect in Antakya (Hatay Province), SE Turkey10.1007/s12665-010-0525-3 ↗
13. Preliminary seismic microzonation of Sivas city (Turkey) using microtremor and refraction microtremor (ReMi) measurements10.1007/s10950-012-9328-1 ↗
14. Seismic site classifcation based on H/V spectral ratio from strong ground motion records: The urban areas of Bursa province10.1007/s10950-024-10206-7 ↗
15. Single-station microtremor surveys for site characterization: A case study in Erzurum city, eastern Turkey10.1007/s11803-024-2257-5 ↗
16. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface
17. A note on the use of microseisms in determining the shallow structures of the Earth’s crust10.1190/1.1439640 ↗
18. Shabani, E., Cornou, C., Haghshenas, E., Wathelet, M., Bard, P.Y., Mirzaei, N., and Eskandari-Ghadi, M. (2008, January 12–17). Estimating shear-waves velocity structure by using array methods (FK and SPAC) and inversion of ellipticity curves at a site in south of Tehran. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
19. Characterization of the shear wave velocity in the metropolitan area of Málaga (S Spain) using the H/V technique10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.016 ↗
20. Anggono, T., Febriani, F., and Amran, A. (2019). Inversion of shallow subsurface structure from Rayleigh ellipticity beneath a station in Tangerang. donesia. In Journal of Physics Conference Series, IOP Publishing.10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012013 ↗
21. Issaadi, A., Semmane, F., Yelles-Chaouche, A., Galiana-Merino, J.J., and Layadi, K. (2020). A Shear-Wave Velocity Model in the City of Oued-Fodda (Northern Algeria) from Rayleigh Wave Ellipticity Inversion. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10051717 ↗
22. Obtaining S-Wave Velocity Structure Using Rayleigh Wave Ellipticity: Erzurum Example
23. Bedrock depth calculation of Çanakkale (Turkey) basin using Rayleigh ellipticity and microgravity survey10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2023.62.1.1447 ↗
24. (2025, January 09). T.C. Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, AFAD, Available online: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/last-earthquakes.html.
25. Geopsy: A user-friendly open-source tool set for ambient vibration processing10.1785/0220190360 ↗
26. (2025, August 09). Geopsy. Available online: https://www.geopsy.org/.
27. Seismicity and Earthquake Hazard Analysis of Southeastern Anatolia Region
28. Danıs, H. (2019). Characteristics of Rocks Used as Aggregate in Diyarbakir and Its Surroundings. [Master’s Thesis, Dicle University, Institute of Science]. 227p.
29. Seismicity and Ground Properties of Diyarbakir and Its Surroundings
30. Seismicity of Southeastern Anatolia Region and Its Vicinity
31. Investigating the Origin of Gneiss and Amphibolite in the Bitlis Massif Lice-Kulp (Diyarbakir) and Cökekyazı-Gökay (Hizan, Bitlis) Regions
32. Pawlewicz, M.J., Williams, A.J., Walden, S.M., and Steinshouer, D.W. (2003). Generalized Geology of Europe including Turkey (geo4_2l), U.S. Geological Survey Data Release.
33. Noise Suppression in Microtremor Measurements for Site Characterization
34. Extraction of dynamic soil parameters from microtremor data using high-pass filtering techniques
35. Application of high-pass filters for seismic noise removal in microtremor data
36. Microtremor data processing for seismic activity monitoring and early warning systems
37. STA/LTA ratio analysis for microtremor data and its application in noise reduction
38. Buyuksarac, A., Sayıl, A., Bektas, O., and Akın, O. (2018). Earthquake Science, Gazi Kitapevi.
39. Zor, E., Ozalaybey, S., Karaslan, A., Tapırdamaz, M.C., Cetin, S., Tarancıoglu, A., and Erkan, B. (2011, January 11–14). Determination of S-Wave Velocity Structure and Site Classification Using Active and Passive Source Methods. Proceedings of the 1st Turkish Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Conference, Ankara, Turkey.
40. Estimation of S-wave velocity profile using microtremor measurements: Application to site response analysis
41. Joint Inversion of Phase Velocity Dispersion and H/V Ratio Curves from Seismic Noise Recordings Using a Genetic Algorithm, Considering Higher Modes10.1029/2004GL021115 ↗
42. Joint Inversion H/V Ratios and Dispersion Curves from Seismic Noise: Estimating the S-wave Velocity of Bedrock10.1029/2005GL022878 ↗
43. Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor10.1785/BSSA0880010228 ↗
44. Ullah, I. (2017). Near-Surface Characterization from the H/V Spectral Curves Along with the Joint Inversion of the Ellipticity and Dispersion Curves. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of São Paulo]. 195p.
45. A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01406.x ↗
46. Microtremor measurements for seismic site characterization in urban environments
47. Rayleigh wave ellipticity in microtremor analysis for shallow soil characterization
48. Determination of the shear wave velocity (vs) profile and subsurface density by measuring microtremor using Rayleigh wave ellipticity inversion in Palu city10.1063/5.0164492 ↗
49. January 24 2020 Sivrice (Turkey) Earthquake (Mw 6.8): Evaluation of Ground Motion Prediction Equations and Microtremor Studies
50. Investigation of soil dynamic characteristics at seismic stations using H/V spectral ratio method in Marmara Region, Turkey10.1007/s11069-021-04959-4 ↗
51. Dynamic sub-surface characteristic and the active faults of the Genç District locating over the Bingöl Seismic Gap of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Eastern Turkey10.1007/s11069-022-05414-8 ↗
52. Investigation of soil dynamic properties using horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio for Eastern Pontides, Northeast Turkey10.1007/s12665-022-10643-y ↗
53. Real-time information systems for seismic hazards mitigation UrEDAS, HERAS and PIC
54. Nakamura, Y. (1997). Seismic Vulnerability Indices for Ground and Structures Using Microtremor, World Congress on Railway Research.
55. Nakamura, Y. (February, January 30). Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its applications. Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
56. Ishihara, K. (1996). Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198562245.001.0001 ↗
57. (2025, August 09). T.C. Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change, Available online: https://csb.gov.tr/en.
58. TBEC (2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code.
59. (2005). Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3).
60. NHERP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) Building Seismic Safety Council (2003). Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures and Accompanying Commentary and Maps, FEMA 450, Chapter 3.
61. Estimation of glacier thicknesses and basal properties using the horizontal-to-vertical component spectral ratio (HVSR) technique from passive seismic data10.1017/jog.2016.135 ↗