journal article·2025-08-01Open access

Managing Surcharge Risk in Strategic Fleet Deployment: A Partial Relaxed MIP Model Framework with a Case Study on China-Built Ships

Yanmeng Tao, Ying Yang, Shuaian Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 15

Abstract

Container liner shipping companies operate within a complex environment where they must balance profitability and service reliability. Meanwhile, evolving regulatory policies, such as surcharges imposed on ships of a particular origin or type on specific trade lanes, introduce new operational challenges. This study addresses the heterogeneous ship routing and demand acceptance problem, aiming to maximize two conflicting objectives: weekly profit and total transport volume. We formulate the problem as a bi-objective mixed-integer programming model and prove that the ship chartering constraint matrix is totally unimodular, enabling the reformulation of the model into a partially relaxed MIP that preserves optimality while improving computational efficiency. We further analyze key mathematical properties showing that the Pareto frontier consists of a finite union of continuous, piecewise linear segments but is generally non-convex with discontinuities. A case study based on a realistic liner shipping network confirms the model’s effectiveness in capturing the trade-off between profit and transport volume. Sensitivity analyses show that increasing freight rates enables higher profits without large losses in volume. Notably, this paper provides a practical risk management framework for shipping companies to enhance their adaptability under shifting regulatory landscapes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Maritime Ports and Logistics · Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimization in liner shipping
2. (2025, May 05). Notice of Action and Proposed Action in Section 301 Investigation of China’s Targeting the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance, Request for Comments, Available online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/04/23/2025-06927/notice-of-action-and-proposed-action-in-section-301-investigation-of-chinas-targeting-the-maritime.
3. (2025, May 05). U.S. Proposes Port Fees on Chinese-Built Ships and Operators to Counter China’s Shipping Dominance. Available online: https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/03/us-proposes-port-fees-on-chinese-built-ships.
4. (2025, May 05). U.S. Revises Section 301 Tariffs on Chinese Vessels Amid Industry Pushback. Available online: https://www.shipuniverse.com/news/u-s-revises-section-301-tariffs-on-chinese-vessels-amid-industry-pushback/.
5. (2025, July 16). USTR Section 301 Action on China’s Targeting of the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance, Available online: https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2025/april/ustr-section-301-action-chinas-targeting-maritime-logistics-and-shipbuilding-sectors-dominance.
6. (2025, July 16). Proposed U.S. Port Fees on China-Built Ships Begins Choking Coal, Agriculture Exports. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/proposed-us-port-fees-china-built-ships-begins-choking-coal-agriculture-exports-2025-03-19/.
7. (2025, July 16). Trump Is Targeting China-Made Containerships in New Flank of Global Economic War on the Oceans. Available online: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/11/trump-pursues-new-trade-war-on-seas-targeting-china-containerships.html.
8. (2025, May 05). Launch of the Review of Maritime Transport 2024. Available online: https://unctad.org/meeting/launch-review-maritime-transport-2024.
9. Heterogeneous vessel fleet co-management for liner alliances under profit-sharing agreement and weekly-dependent demand
10. Holistic tactical-level planning in liner shipping: An exact optimization approach10.1186/s41072-020-00060-4 ↗
11. Optimization of ship routing and allocation in a container transport network considering port congestion: A variational inequality model10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106798 ↗
12. Ship scheduling and cost analysis for route planning in liner shipping10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100087 ↗
13. Liner shipping network design with emission control areas: A genetic algorithm-based approach10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.020 ↗
14. Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areas
15. Full-shipload tramp ship routing and scheduling with variable speeds10.1016/j.cor.2015.10.002 ↗
16. In-port multi-ship routing and scheduling problem with draft limits10.1080/03088839.2020.1783465 ↗
17. The multi-port berth allocation problem with speed optimization and emission considerations10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.002 ↗
18. Multi-objective optimization for a liner shipping service from different perspectives10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.392 ↗
19. Xiao, P., and Wang, H. (2024). Ship type selection and cost optimization of marine container ships based on genetic algorithm. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14219816 ↗
20. Liu, T., Liu, J., and Xu, H. (2025). A multi-population multi-objective maritime inventory routing optimization algorithm with three-level dynamic encoding. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-86091-y ↗
21. Liner container assignment model with transit-time-sensitive container shipment demand and its applications
22. Wang, T., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Jin, Y., and Wang, S. (2024). Dynamic flexible allocation of slots in container line transport. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16219146 ↗
23. Regulatory compliance and operational efficiency in maritime transport: Strategies and insights
24. Literature survey of network optimization in container liner shipping10.1007/s10696-013-9179-2 ↗
25. Fleet deployment and speed optimization of container ships considering bunker fuel consumption heterogeneity10.1007/s44176-022-00003-2 ↗
26. Simultaneous optimization of the liner shipping route and ship schedule designs with time windows10.1155/2020/3287973 ↗
27. An integrated optimization method for tactical-level planning in liner shipping with heterogeneous ship fleet and environmental considerations10.1016/j.aei.2021.101299 ↗
28. Toward green container liner shipping: Joint optimization of heterogeneous fleet deployment, speed optimization, and fuel bunkering
29. A matheuristic for the liner shipping network design problem10.1016/j.tre.2014.09.012 ↗
30. Liner shipping network design with sensitive demand10.1108/MABR-10-2019-0045 ↗
31. Joint planning of fleet deployment, speed optimization, and cargo allocation for liner shipping10.1287/trsc.2015.0625 ↗
32. Robust ship fleet deployment with shipping revenue management10.1016/j.trb.2022.05.005 ↗
33. Zhao, Z., Wang, X., Wang, H., Cheng, S., and Liu, W. (2022). Fleet deployment optimization for LNG shipping vessels considering the influence of mixed factors. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.2139/ssrn.4235065 ↗
34. Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: A taxonomy and survey10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.012 ↗
35. The trade-reducing effects of restrictions on liner shipping10.1016/j.jce.2016.03.001 ↗
36. Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: The COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5 ↗
37. Bichou, K. (2014). Port Operations, Planning and Logistics, CRC Press. [1st ed.].10.4324/9781315850443 ↗
38. Impact of COVID-19 on China’s international liner shipping network based on AIS data10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.006 ↗
39. Uncertainty in maritime ship routing and scheduling: A Literature review10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.006 ↗
40. Exact and heuristic methods for the integrated optimisation of vessel deployment and liner shipping routing schedule
41. Port disruptions due to natural disasters: Insights into port and logistics resilience10.1016/j.trd.2020.102393 ↗
42. Elmi, Z., Singh, P., Meriga, V.K., Goniewicz, K., Borowska-Stefańska, M., Wiśniewski, S., and Dulebenets, M.A. (2022). Uncertainties in liner shipping and ship schedule recovery: A state-of-the-art review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10050563 ↗
43. Robust distributed predictive control of waterborne AGVs—A cooperative and cost-effective approach10.1109/TCYB.2017.2740558 ↗
44. Multi-objective optimization for skip-stop strategy based on smartcard data considering total travel time and equity10.1177/03611981211013044 ↗
45. A multi-objective optimization model for robust skip-stop scheduling with earliness and tardiness penalties10.1007/s40864-019-00108-0 ↗
46. Equity-oriented skip-stopping schedule optimization in an oversaturated urban rail transit network10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.016 ↗
47. Accessible taxi routing strategy based on travel behavior of people with disabilities incorporating vehicle routing problem and Gaussian mixture model10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100687 ↗
48. Multi-objective optimization of submerged floating tunnel route considering structural safety and total travel time
49. Wen, X., Chen, Q., Yin, Y.Q., Lau, Y.Y., and Dulebenets, M.A. (2024). Multi-objective optimization for ship scheduling with port congestion and environmental considerations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12010114 ↗
50. (2025, May 05). Revised US Port Fee Plan Leaves Important Questions Unanswered, Lawyers Argue. Available online: https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1153244/Revised-US-port-fee-plan-leaves-important-questions-unanswered-lawyers-argue.
51. Hoffman, A.J., and Kruskal, J.B. (2010). Integral boundary points of convex polyhedra. 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008: From the Early Years to the State-of-the-Art, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_3 ↗
52. Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems
53. Zhao, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., and Wang, H. (2021). Multicriteria ship route planning method based on improved particle swarm optimization–genetic algorithm. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9040357 ↗
54. Chen, Y., Li, J., Hao, X., Zhao, Y., and Gong, Y. (2022, January 19–24). Dispatch optimization of maritime rescue forces in Arctic shipping based on the comparison of TOPSIS and the weighted scoring method. Proceedings of the ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Sapporo, Japan.
55. Farmakis, P., Chassiakos, A., and Karatzas, S. (2023). A Multi-Objective Tri-Level Algorithm for Hub-and-Spoke Network in Short Sea Shipping Transportation. Algorithms, 16.10.3390/a16080379 ↗
56. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems10.1007/BF01197559 ↗
57. Ravindran, A.R. (2016). Multi-objective optimization. Decision Sciences, CRC Press. [1st ed.].
58. (2025, May 05). CMA CGM, Maersk, and COSCO Compete for the Market Lead in the Asia–North America Trade. Available online: https://globalmaritimehub.com/cma-cgm-maersk-and-cosco-compete-for-the-market-lead-in-the-asia-north-america-trade.html.
59. (2025, May 05). Better Ways, Making Supply Chains More Sustainable Every Day. Available online: https://www.cma-cgm.com/about/the-group.
60. (2025, May 05). Evolution of Vessel Size on the Asia-Europe Route. Available online: https://www.porttechnology.org/news/evolution-of-vessel-size-on-the-asia-europe-route/.
61. (2025, May 05). Alphaliner Top 100. Available online: https://alphaliner.axsmarine.com/PublicTop100/.
62. (2025, May 05). Most Shipping Lines Can Avoid US Port Fees but Cosco Faces Major Challenge. Available online: https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1153279/Most-shipping-lines-can-avoid-US-port-fees-but-Cosco-faces-major-challenge.
63. (2025, May 05). Ocean Alliance Day9 Route Products. Available online: https://www.cargoespi.com/blogs/news/ocean-alliance-day9-routes.
64. (2025, May 05). MSC China-North Europe Sea Route. Available online: https://www.shiphub.co/msc-china-north-europe-sea-route/.
65. (2025, May 05). The Future Standalone MSC East/West Network. Available online: https://www.msc.com/en/solutions/our-trade-services/east-west-network.
66. (2025, May 05). Maersk and MSC Switch to Liverpool Port Permanently. Available online: https://www.logisticsmanager.com/maersk-and-msc-switch-to-liverpool-port-permanently/.
67. (2025, May 05). MSC Revises Its Asia to North America West Coast Network. Available online: https://www.msc.com/en/newsroom/customer-advisories/2025/february/msc-revises-its-asia-to-north-america-west-coast-network.
68. (2025, May 05). THE Alliance Announces Updated Service Network for 2024. Available online: https://container-news.com/the-alliance-announces-updated-service-network-for-2024/.
69. (2025, May 05). Containerized Cargo Flows on Major Container Trade Routes in 2024, by Trade Route. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/253988/estimated-containerized-cargo-flows-on-major-container-trade-routes/.
70. (2025, May 05). Review of Maritime Transport 2024. Available online: https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2024.
71. (2025, May 05). Drewry World Container Index. Available online: https://www.drewry.co.uk/supply-chain-advisors/supply-chain-expertise/world-container-index-assessed-by-drewry.
72. (2025, May 05). Freightos Container Shipping Cost Calculator. Available online: https://www.freightos.com/freight-resources/container-shipping-cost-calculator-free-tool/.
73. (2025, May 05). Drewry Intra-Asia Container Index. Available online: https://www.drewry.co.uk/supply-chain-advisors/supply-chain-expertise/intra-asia-container-index.
74. Sailing speed optimization for container ships in a liner shipping network10.1016/j.tre.2011.12.003 ↗
75. (2025, May 05). Ship & Bunker. Global 20 Ports Average Bunker Prices. Available online: https://shipandbunker.com/prices/av/global/av-g20-global-20-ports-average.
76. Revising the Pareto Chart10.1198/000313006X152243 ↗
77. Liner ship fleet deployment with container transshipment operations10.1016/j.tre.2011.10.011 ↗
78. Liu, M., Liu, Z., Liu, R., and Sun, L. (2022). Distribution-free approaches for an integrated cargo routing and empty container repositioning problem with repacking operations in liner shipping networks. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142214773 ↗
79. Liner shipping hub location and empty container repositioning: Use of foldable containers and container leasing10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121592 ↗
80. Zheng, J., Mao, C., and Zhang, Q. (2023). Hybrid dynamic modeling and receding horizon speed optimization for liner shipping operations from schedule reliability and energy efficiency perspectives. Front. Mar. Sci., 10.10.3389/fmars.2023.1095283 ↗
81. Jiang, X., and Lin, Y. (2024, January 26–28). Sailing speed optimization for near-sea shipping services considering container routing. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data, Dali, China.10.1145/3695080.3695187 ↗
82. Real-time schedule recovery in liner shipping service with regular uncertainties and disruption events10.1016/j.trb.2015.10.004 ↗
83. Sun, M., Vortia, M.P., Xiao, G., and Yang, J. (2025). Carbon policies and liner speed optimization: Comparisons of carbon trading and carbon tax combined with the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 13.10.3390/jmse13020204 ↗
84. Sun, L., Wang, X., Hu, Z., and Ning, Z. (2024). Carbon and cost accounting for liner shipping under the European Union Emission Trading System. Front. Mar. Sci., 11.10.3389/fmars.2024.1291968 ↗
85. Liner shipping network design model with carbon tax, seasonal freight rate fluctuations and empty container relocation10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100073 ↗
86. Wang, H., Liu, Y., Li, F., and Wang, S. (2023). Sustainable maritime transportation operations with emission trading. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11091647 ↗
87. Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria Optimization, Springer. [2nd ed.].