journal article·2025-06-25Open access

Off-Line Stacking for Multichannel GPR Processing in Clay-Rich Archaeological Sites: The Case Study of Tindari (Sicily)

Cesare Comina, Rosina Leone, Ivan Palmisano, Andrea Vergnano

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

For archaeological studies, the expected outcome of a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey is a series of time-slices (or depth-slices) that mark the position of buried structures at different depths. The clarity of these time-slices is strongly site-dependent and is particularly worsened in the presence of even small percentages of clay, which strongly attenuates the GPR signal. This is the condition affecting the Greek–Roman archaeological site of Tindari (Sicily, Italy). Here, we performed a multichannel GPR survey particularly focusing on a residential insula. In order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, we tested two processing strategies: a conventional in-line stacking and a new concept of off-line stacking. This last was performed dividing spatially adjacent channels of the GPR multichannel system into groups and stacking the signals of each group at each specific location. We observed that off-line stacking improves the signal-to-noise ratio in 2D sections and time-slices quality. Comparisons showed that off-line stacking has a clear advantage over traditional in-line stacking, at least for the specific application reported in this paper. Off-line stacking of GPR multichannel systems is, therefore, simple but very effective in increasing the investigation depth, especially in challenging environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin, 10125 Torino, Italy

Department of Historical Studies, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Corradini, E., Groß, D., Wunderlich, T., Lübke, H., Wilken, D., Erkul, E., Schmölcke, U., and Rabbel, W. (2022). Finding Mesolithic Sites: A Multichannel Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Investigation at the Ancient Lake Duvensee. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14030781 ↗
2. Trinks, I., Gustafsson, J., Emilsson, J., Gustafsson, C., Johansson, B., and Nissen, J. (2009). Efficient, Large-Scale Archaeological Prospection Using a True 3D GPR Array System. ArchéoSciences, 367–370.10.4000/archeosciences.1857 ↗
3. Viberg, A., Gustafsson, C., and Andrén, A. (2020). Multi-Channel Ground-Penetrating Radar Array Surveys of the Iron Age and Medieval Ringfort Bårby on the Island of Öland, Sweden. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12020227 ↗
4. The STREAM X Multichannel GPR System: First Test at Vieil-Evreux (France) and Comparison with Other Geophysical Data10.1002/arp.1426 ↗
5. Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys in the Archaeological Area of Augusta Bagiennorum: Comparisons between Geophysical and Archaeological Campaigns10.1002/arp.1855 ↗
6. Evaluation of the Benefits for Mapping Faint Archaeological Features by Using an Ultra-dense Ground-penetrating-radar Antenna Array10.1002/arp.1870 ↗
7. Goodman, D., Novo, A., Morelli, G., Piro, S., Kutrubes, D., and Lorenzo, H. (2011, January 10–14). Advances in GPR Imaging with Multi-Channel Radar Systems from Engineering to Archaeology. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2011, Charleston, SC, USA,.10.4133/1.3614128 ↗
8. Medium- to High-Resolution Integrated Geophysical Surveys to Reconstruct an Archaeological Settlement: New Perspectives from the Ancient Town of Nora, Southwestern Sardinia (Italy). Preliminary Results10.1007/978-3-031-65332-2_22 ↗
9. Multichannel GPR and Multi-Depth Electromagnetic Surveys for the Study of Villa Eucheria and Aquinum at Castrocielo (Frosinone, Central Italy)10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105466 ↗
10. Integration of Satellite and Aerial Images with Multichannel GPR Surveys in the Archaeological Area of Augusta Bagiennorum for an Improved Description of the Urban Setting10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105579 ↗
11. The Third KV62 Radar Scan: Searching for Hidden Chambers Adjacent to Tutankhamun’s Tomb10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.001 ↗
12. Wunderlich, T., Hadler, H., and Blankenfeldt, R. (2023). Structure Aware Noise Reduction of Multi-Channel Ground Penetrating Radar Data Using Principal Component Analysis. Advances in On- and Offshore Archaeological Prospection, Universitätsverlag Kiel|Kiel University Publishing.
13. Significance of GPR Polarisation for Improving Target Detection and Characterisation10.1080/10589759.2014.949708 ↗
14. 2D and 3D Ground-penetrating Radar Surveys with a Modular System: Data Processing Strategies and Results from Archaeological Field Tests10.3997/1873-0604.2013007 ↗
15. Gabryś, M., and Ortyl, Ł. (2020). Georeferencing of Multi-Channel GPR—Accuracy and Efficiency of Mapping of Underground Utility Networks. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12182945 ↗
16. Georadar in the Roman Civil Town Carnuntum, Austria: An Approach for Archaeological Interpretation of GPR Data10.1002/arp.183 ↗
17. Full-Resolution 3D GPR Imaging10.1190/1.1852780 ↗
18. GPR Imaging Criteria10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.04.008 ↗
19. Integrated Geophysical Surveys at the Archaeological Site of Tindari (Sicily, Italy)10.1016/j.jas.2005.11.004 ↗
20. Caliò, L.M., Campagna, L., Gerogiannis, G.M., Portale, E.C., and Sole, L. (2024). La Sicilia fra le Guerre Civili e L’epoca Giulio-Claudia: Atti del I Convegno Internazionale, Palermo, 19–21 Maggio 2022, Museo Archeologico Regionale “Antonino Salinas”, Edizioni Quasar. Museo Archeologico Regionale Antonino Salinas, Convegni di Archeologia Siciliana.
21. Parello, M.C. (2024). L’ Isola Dei Tesori: Ricerca Archeologica e Nuove Acquisizioni: Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Agrigento, Museo Archeologico Regionale “Pietro Griffo”, 14–17 Dicembre 2023), Ante Quem. Ricerche Series Maior.
22. Sandmeier, K.-J. (2025, June 24). Reflexw 10.0, the Processing Package for 2D and 3D Interpretation of GPR, Reflection Seismics and Refraction Seismics. Available online: https://www.sandmeier-geo.de/reflexw.html.
23. Large-area High-resolution Ground-penetrating Radar Measurements for Archaeological Prospection10.1002/arp.1599 ↗
24. Kong, Q., Ye, S., Liang, X., Li, X., Liu, X., Fang, G., and Si, G. (2024). A Clutter Removal Method Based on the F-K Domain for Ground-Penetrating Radar in Complex Scenarios. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16060935 ↗
25. Removal of Wavelet Dispersion from Ground-penetrating Radar Data10.1190/1.1581068 ↗
26. Denoising Method of Ground-Penetrating Radar Signal Based on Independent Component Analysis with Multifractal Spectrum10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110886 ↗
27. (2011). Standard Guide for Using the Surface Ground Penetrating Radar Method for Subsurface Investigation (Standard No. ASTM D6432-11).
28. The Impact of High-density Spatial Sampling versus Antenna Orientation on 3D GPR Fracture Imaging10.3997/1873-0604.2015007 ↗
29. Clay Content Evaluation in Soils through GPR Signal Processing10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.04.006 ↗