Navigational Risk Assessment in Offshore Wind Farms Using Spatial Ship Domain Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Navigation in offshore wind farm (OWF) areas is essential for construction, maintenance, safety, and traditional activities like fishing. However, the presence of OWFs extends to sea routes, negatively impacting maritime transport economics. This paper examines navigational risk indicators in the vertical and horizontal planes of the ship domain for three representative vessels navigating under different hydrometeorological conditions within the location of a proposed offshore wind farm in the Polish sector of the Baltic Sea. The study compares three types of domain parameters defined by the PIANC guidelines, Coldwell’s two-dimensional model, and Rutkowski’s three-dimensional model. The analysis includes navigational hazards located ahead of the ship’s bow and astern from the aft, as well as keeping under-keel and over-head clearance. Besides the main numerical indicators of navigational risk estimated for obstacles on the port and starboard sides, the study emphasizes the importance of such additional factors. The primary objective of this paper is to identify the ship types that can navigate and fish safely in proximity to and within the OWF area. The analysis employs hydrometeorological data, mathematical models, and operational data derived from maritime navigation and maneuvering simulators. This comprehensive approach aims to enhance maritime safety in OWF areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Navigation and Safety · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Navigation, Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University, 80-548 Gdansk, Poland
Department of Operational Oceanography, Maritime Institute, Gdynia Maritime University, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland
Funding
Gdynia Maritime University
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Council of Ministers (2025, June 09). Regulation on the Adoption of the Spatial Development Plan for Internal Marine Waters, Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone of Poland, Scale 1:200,000. Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, Item 935, Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20210000935.
2. Blue justice through and beyond equity and participation: A critical reading of capability-based recognitional justice in Poland’s marine spatial planning10.1080/09640568.2023.2183823 ↗
3. Methodology of maritime spatial planning in Poland
4. In search of social sustainability in marine spatial planning: A review of scientific literature published 2005–202010.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105618 ↗
5. Przedrzymirska, J., Zaucha, J., Calado, H., Lukic, I., Bocci, M., Ramieri, E., Varona, M.C., Barbanti, A., Depellegrin, D., and de Sousa Vergílio, M. (2021). Multi-Use of the Sea as a Sustainable Development Instrument in Five EU Sea Basins. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13158159 ↗
6. Wróbel, K., Gil, M., Huang, Y., and Wawruch, R. (2022). The Vagueness of COLREG versus Collision Avoidance Techniques—A Discussion on the Current State and Future Challenges Concerning the Operation of Autonomous Ships. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142416516 ↗
7. Preventing shipping accidents: Past, present, and future of waterway risk management with Baltic Sea focus10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104798 ↗
8. Rutkowski, G., and Kubacka, M. (2023). Analysis of navigational risk indicators as a function of the ship’s domain width for the selected offshore wind farm in the Baltic Sea. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-36114-3 ↗
9. (2025, May 25). Serwis Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Available online: https://www.gov.pl.
10. Baltic Power Sp. z o.o (2025, June 09). Baltic Power Offshore Wind Farm—Environmental Impact Assessment Report. Available online: https://www.balticpower.pl.
11. Polish Wind Energy Association (PSEW) (2025, June 09). Offshore Wind Energy Development in Poland—Economic Potential Report. Available online: https://psew.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/PSEW_Report_Offshore_2021.pdf.
12. Ministry of Infrastructure, Poland (2025, June 09). National Offshore Wind Energy Development Program Until 2040 (NOP-OZE), Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/infrastruktura.
13. (2023, November 03). Urząd Morski w Gdyni, Available online: https://www.umgdy.gov.pl/en/.
14. Polish Maritime Administration: Navigation Expertise for OWF Dated 2023-02-14 (Doc. No.: PMO-MAAC-PMP-CO-01).
15. Wielgosz, M., and Pietrzykowski, Z. (2022). The ship domain in navigational safety assessment. PLoS ONE, 17, Available online: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265681.10.1371/journal.pone.0265681 ↗
16. Li, W., Zhong, L., Xu, Y., and Shi, G. (2022). Collision Risk Index Calculation Based on an Improved Ship Domain Model. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10122016 ↗
17. Modeling of Safe Distance Between Ship Routes and Offshore Wind Farm Based on Tolerable Collision Probability10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187117 ↗
18. A Novel Method for Navigational Risk Assessment in Wind Farm Waters Based on the Fuzzy Inference System10.1155/2021/4588333 ↗
19. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (1974). International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, SOLAS, International Maritime Organization (IMO). Consolidated text Retrieved 5 June 2022; 2015.
20. Marine Traffic Behaviour in Restricted Waters10.1017/S0373463300039783 ↗
21. A Unified Analytical Framework for Ship Domains10.1017/S0373463309990178 ↗
22. Zhou, J., Wang, C., and Zhang, A. (2020). A COLREGs-Based Dynamic Navigation Safety Domain for Unmanned Surface Vehicles: A Case Study of Dolphin-I. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8.10.3390/jmse8040264 ↗
23. Rutkowski, G. (2000). Modelling the Ship’s Domain in the Process of Manoeuvring in Restricted Sea Areas. [Doctoral Dissertation, Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport]. (In Polish).
24. Risk analysis when navigating in restricted sea areas
25. Analysis of a practical method for estimating the ship’s best possible speed when passing under bridges or other suspended obstacles10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108790 ↗
26. United Kingdom Hydrographic Office (UKHO) (2022). Admiralty Sailing Directions: Baltic Pilot Vol. 2 (Np19), United Kingdom Hydrographic Office. [18th ed.].
27. Nowakowski, Z., Magierek, R., and Deorocki, M. (2016). Locja Bałtyku. Wybrzeże Polskie, Biuro Hydrografczne Marynarki Wojennej. [10th ed.]. (In Polish).
28. PIANC—The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (2018). Interaction Between Offshore Wind Farms and Maritime Navigation, MarCom Working Group WG 161, The World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure.
29. (2002). International Maritime Organization (IMO). (Adopted on 4 December 2002). Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability (Standard No. Resolution MSC.137(76)).
30. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2022, June 05). MSC/Circ.1053. Explanatory Notes to the Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability. Available online: https://www.register-iri.com/wp-content/uploads/MSC.1-Circ.1053.pdf.
31. Determining Ship’s Safe Speed and Best Possible Speed for Sea Voyage Legs10.12716/1001.10.03.07 ↗
32. Determining the Best Possible Speed of the Ship in Shallow Waters Estimated Based on the Adopted Model for Calculation of the Ship’s Domain Depth10.2478/pomr-2020-0055 ↗
33. Kramarska, R. (1991). Geological Map of the Baltic Sea bottom, 1:200,000, Sheet Ławica Słupska N., Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny.
34. Power-Technology (2025, June 09). F.E.W. Baltic II Offshore Wind Farm (Poland). Available online: https://www.power-technology.com/projects/f-e-w-baltic-ii-offshore-wind-farm-poland/.
35. A novel fuzzy multi-factor navigational risk assessment method for ship route optimization in costal offshore wind farm waters10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106428 ↗
36. The safe distance between the offshore wind farm and the airway
37. Searching for the origins of the myth: 80% human error impact on maritime safety10.1016/j.ress.2021.107942 ↗