On Implementing Technomorph Biology for Inefficient Computing
Source abstract
Abstract
It is commonly accepted that ‘the brain computes’ and that it serves as a model for establishing principles of technical (first of all, electronic) computing. Even today, some biological implementation details inspire the implementation of more performant electronic implementations. However, grasping details without context often leads to decreasing operating efficiency. In the cases of those major implementations, the notion of ‘computing’ has an entirely different meaning. We provide the notion of generalized computing from which we derive technical and biological computing, and by showing how the functionalities are implemented, we also highlight what performance losses lead the solution. Both implementations have been developed using a success–failure method, keeping the successful part-solutions (and building on top of them) and replacing a less successful one with another. Both developments proceed from a local minimum of their goal functions to another, but some principles differ fundamentally. Moreover, they apply entirely different principles, and the part-solutions must cooperate with others, so grasping some biological solution without understanding its context and implementing it in the technical solution usually leads to a loss of efficiency. Today, technical systems’ absolute performance seems to be saturated, while their computing and energetic inefficiency are growing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks · Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kalimános Bt, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. BRAIN @ 10: A decade of innovation10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.007 ↗
2. Johnson, D.H. (2008, January 5–9). Information theory and neuroscience: Why is the intersection so small?. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Information Theory Workshop, Porto, Portugal.10.1109/ITW.2008.4578631 ↗
3. European Union (2025, April 26). Human Brain Project. Available online: https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/.
4. Computation by natural systems10.1098/rsfs.2018.0058 ↗
5. Is realistic neuronal modeling realistic?10.1152/jn.00360.2016 ↗
6. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
7. Végh, J., and Berki, Á.J. (2022). Towards generalizing the information theory for neural communication. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24081086 ↗
8. The Bandwagon10.1109/TIT.1956.1056774 ↗
9. Information theory is abused in neuroscience
10. Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain?10.1017/S0140525X19000049 ↗
11. Schuman, C.D., Potok, T.E., Patton, R.M., Birdwell, J.D., Dean, M.E., Rose, G.S., and Plank, J.S. (2024, September 10). A Survey of Neuromorphic Computing and Neural Networks in Hardware. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06963.
12. Kandel, E.R., Schwartz, J.H., Jessell, T.M., and Hudspeth, A.J. (2013). Principles of Neural Science, The McGraw-Hill. [5th ed.].
13. A Review of Spiking Neuromorphic Hardware Communication Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941772 ↗
14. van Albada, S.J., Rowley, A.G., Senk, J., Hopkins, M., Schmidt, M., Stokes, A.B., Lester, D.R., Diesmann, M., and Furber, S.B. (2018). Performance Comparison of the Digital Neuromorphic Hardware SpiNNaker and the Neural Network Simulation Software NEST for a Full-Scale Cortical Microcircuit Model. Front. Neurosci., 12.10.3389/fnins.2018.00291 ↗
15. The impact of on-chip communication on memory technologies for neuromorphic systems10.1088/1361-6463/aae641 ↗
16. Suh, S.C., Gurupur, V.P., and Tanik, M.M. (2011). The great migration: Information content to knowledge using cognition based frameworks. Biomedical Engineering: Health Care Systems, Technology and Techniques, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-0116-2 ↗
17. Europe spent €600 million to recreate the human brain in a computer. How did it go?10.1038/d41586-023-02600-x ↗
18. Végh, J. (2020, January 16–18). von Neumann’s missing “Second Draft”: What it should contain. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI’20), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CSCI51800.2020.00235 ↗
19. Can Programming Languages Be liberated from the von Neumann Style? A Functional Style and its Algebra of Programs10.1145/359576.359579 ↗
20. Végh, J. (2023, January 20–22). Why does von Neumann obstruct deep learning?. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/CINTI59972.2023.10382120 ↗
21. Végh, J. (2021). Revising the Classic Computing Paradigm and Its Technological Implementations. Informatics, 8.10.3390/informatics8040071 ↗
22. Waser, R. (2012). Advanced Electronics Materials and Novel Devices, Wiley-VCH. Nanoelectronics and Information Technology.
23. Neural syntax: Cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.023 ↗
24. The log-dynamic brain: How skewed distributions affect network operations10.1038/nrn3687 ↗
25. Spike Timing–Dependent Plasticity: A Hebbian Learning Rule10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125639 ↗
26. Madl, T., Baars, B.J., and Franklin, S. (2011). The timing of the cognitive cycle. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0014803 ↗
27. Cai, M., and Demmans Epp, C. (2024). Exploring the Optimal Time Window for Predicting Cognitive Load Using Physiological Sensor Data. arXiv.
28. Effects of noise in excitable systems10.1016/j.physrep.2003.10.015 ↗
29. Electrotonic properties of neurons: Steady-state compartmental model10.1152/jn.1978.41.3.621 ↗
30. Smirnova, L., Caffo, B.S., Gracias, D.H., Huang, Q., Morales Pantoja, I.E., Tang, B., Zack, D.J., Berlinicke, C.A., Boyd, J.L., and Harris, T.D. (2023). Organoid intelligence (OI): The new frontier in biocomputing and intelligence-in-a-dish. Front. Sci., 1.10.3389/fsci.2023.1017235 ↗
31. Kunkel, S., Schmidt, M., Eppler, J.M., Plesser, H.E., Masumoto, G., Igarashi, J., Ishii, S., Fukai, T., Morrison, A., and Diesmann, M. (2014). Spiking network simulation code for petascale computers. Front. Neuroinform., 8.10.3389/fninf.2014.00078 ↗
32. How Amdahl’s Law limits performance of large artificial neural networks10.1186/s40708-019-0097-2 ↗
33. US DOE Office of Science (2025, April 26). Report of a Roundtable Convened to Consider Neuromorphic Computing Basic Research Needs, Available online: https://science.osti.gov/-/media/ascr/pdf/programdocuments/docs/Neuromorphic-Computing-Report_FNLBLP.pdf.
34. Physics for neuromorphic computing10.1038/s42254-020-0208-2 ↗
35. Brain-inspired computing needs a master plan10.1038/s41586-021-04362-w ↗
36. von Neumann, J. (2012). The Computer and the Brain, Yale University Press.
37. Koch, C. (1999). Biophysics of Computation, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195104912.001.0001 ↗
38. Abbott, L., and Sejnowski, T.J. (1999). Neural Codes and Distributed Representations, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4924.001.0001 ↗
39. Lytton, W.W. (2002). From Computer to Brain, Springer.
40. The Computer and the Brain Revisited10.1109/MAHC.1989.10028 ↗
41. Communication consumes 35 times more energy than computation in the human cortex, but both costs are needed to predict synapse number10.1073/pnas.2008173118 ↗
42. Végh, J., and Berki, Á.J. (2022). On the Role of Speed in Technological and Biological Information Transfer for Computations. Acta Biotheor., 70.10.1007/s10441-022-09450-6 ↗
43. Revisiting neural information, computing and linking capacity
44. Which scaling rule applies to Artificial Neural Networks10.1007/s00521-021-06456-y ↗
45. Tsafrir, D. (2007, January 13–14). The Context-switch Overhead Inflicted by Hardware Interrupts (and the Enigma of Do-nothing Loops). Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Experimental Computer Science, ExpCS ’07, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1145/1281700.1281704 ↗
46. David, F.M., Carlyle, J.C., and Campbell, R.H. (2007, January 13–14). Context Switch Overheads for Linux on ARM Platforms. Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Experimental Computer Science, ExpCS ’07, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1145/1281700.1281703 ↗
47. nextplatform.com (2024, September 10). CRAY Revamps Clusterstor for the Exascale Era. Available online: https://www.nextplatform.com/2019/10/30/cray-revamps-clusterstor-for-the-exascale-era/.
48. The building blocks of a brain-inspired computer10.1063/1.5129306 ↗
49. A Mathematical Theory of Energy Efficient Neural Computation and Communication10.1109/TIT.2009.2037089 ↗
50. Schrödinger, E. (1992). Is life based on the laws of physics?. What is Life?: With Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139644129 ↗
51. Végh, J. (2025). The non-ordinary laws of physics describing life. BioSystems, in review.10.2139/ssrn.5217730 ↗
52. Quirion, R. (2025, April 26). Brain Organoids: Are They for Real?. 2023., Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/science/articles/10.3389/fsci.2023.1148127/full.10.3389/fsci.2023.1148127 ↗
53. First draft of a report on the EDVAC10.1109/85.238389 ↗
54. A look back on 30 years of the Gordon Bell Prize10.1177/1094342017738610 ↗
55. IEEE (2025, April 26). IEEE Rebooting Computing. Available online: http://rebootingcomputing.ieee.org/.
56. Cadareanu, P., Reddy C, N., Almudever, C.G., Khanna, A., Raychowdhury, A., Datta, S., Bertels, K., Narayanan, V., Ventra, M.D., and Gaillardon, P.E. (2019, January 25–29). Rebooting Our Computing Models. Proceedings of the 2019 Design, Automation Test in Europe Conference Exhibition (DATE), Florence, Italy.10.23919/DATE.2019.8715167 ↗
57. Finally, how many efficiencies the supercomputers have?10.1007/s11227-020-03210-4 ↗
58. Hameed, R., Qadeer, W., Wachs, M., Azizi, O., Solomatnikov, A., Lee, B.C., Richardson, S., Kozyrakis, C., and Horowitz, M. (2010, January 19–23). Understanding Sources of Inefficiency in General-purpose Chips. Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA ’10, Saint-Malo, France.10.1145/1815961.1815968 ↗
59. Introducing the Explicitly Many-Processor Approach10.1016/j.parco.2018.03.001 ↗
60. Arabnia, H.R., Deligiannidis, L., Tinetti, F.G., and Tran, Q.N. (2021). How to Extend Single-Processor Approach to Explicitly Many-Processor Approach. Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning, Springer International Publishing.
61. Birkhoff, G., and Von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, Springer.10.2307/1968621 ↗
62. Tests measure progress of quantum computers10.1126/science.364.6447.1218 ↗
63. Quantum arithmetic with the quantum Fourier transform10.1007/s11128-017-1603-1 ↗
64. Non-Markovian stochastic resonance: Three-state model of ion channel gating10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061906 ↗
65. Feynman, R.P. (2018). Feynman Lectures on Computation, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429500442 ↗
66. A View of the Parallel Computing Landscape10.1145/1562764.1562783 ↗
67. Dark Silicon and the End of Multicore Scaling10.1109/MM.2012.17 ↗
68. Computing in the dark silicon era: Current trends and research challenges10.1109/MDAT.2016.2633408 ↗
69. Can Dark Silicon Be Exploited to Prolong System Lifetime?10.1109/MDAT.2016.2630317 ↗
70. Limits on fundamental limits to computation10.1038/nature13570 ↗
71. Streching supercomputers to the limit10.1038/d41586-017-07523-y ↗
72. Design for U.S. exascale computer takes shape10.1126/science.359.6376.617 ↗
73. Neural systems engineering10.1098/rsif.2006.0177 ↗
74. Beyond von Neumann10.1038/s41565-020-0738-x ↗
75. Eckert, J.P., and Mauchly, J.W. (1945). Automatic High-Speed Computing: A Progress Report on the EDVAC. Technical Report of Work under Contract No. W-670-ORD-4926, Supplement No 4, Moore School Library, University of Pennsylvania.
76. EPIC: Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing10.1109/2.820037 ↗
77. Computing Performance: Game Over or Next Level?10.1109/MC.2011.15 ↗
78. Ousterhout, J.K. (2024, September 10). Why Aren’t Operating Systems Getting Faster As Fast As Hardware?. 1990., Available online: http://www.stanford.edu/~ouster/cgi-bin/papers/osfaster.pdf.
79. Priority inheritance protocols: An approach to real-time synchronization10.1109/12.57058 ↗
80. A formalization of priority inversion10.1007/BF01088832 ↗
81. Amdahl, G.M. (1967, January 18–20). Validity of the Single Processor Approach to Achieving Large-Scale Computing Capabilities. Proceedings of the AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Atlantic, NJ, USA.10.1145/1465482.1465560 ↗
82. (2025, April 26). ARM. big.LITTLE Technology, Available online: https://developer.arm.com/technologies/big-little.
83. Performance Optimization of the HPCG Benchmark on the Sunway TaihuLight Supercomputer10.1145/3182177 ↗
84. Gordon, S. (2006). The Synaptic Organization of the Brain, Oxford Academic. [5th ed.]. Available online: https://medicine.yale.edu/news/yale-medicine-magazine/article/the-synaptic-organization-of-the-brain-5th-ed/.
85. Scaling Parallel Programs for Multiprocessors: Methodology and Examples10.1109/MC.1993.274941 ↗
86. D’Angelo, G., and Rampone, S. (2014). Towards a HPC-oriented parallel implementation of a learning algorithm for bioinformatics applications. BMC Bioinform., 15.10.1186/1471-2105-15-S5-S2 ↗
87. Keuper, J., and Pfreundt, F.J. (2016, January 14). Distributed Training of Deep Neural Networks: Theoretical and Practical Limits of Parallel Scalability. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning in HPC Environments (MLHPC), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/MLHPC.2016.006 ↗
88. Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model
89. Architectural Support for Data-Driven Execution10.1145/2686874 ↗
90. Exponential Laws of Computing Growth10.1145/2976758 ↗
91. Architectures for the Post-Moore Era10.1109/MM.2017.3211127 ↗
92. Nature (2023). In AI, is bigger always better?. Nature, 615.10.1038/d41586-023-00641-w ↗
93. Smith, B. (2007, January 17–21). Reinventing computing. Proceedings of the International Supercomputing Conference, Seattle, WT, USA.
94. Lee, V.W., Kim, C., Chhugani, J., Deisher, M., Kim, D., Nguyen, A.D., Satish, N., Smelyanskiy, M., Chennupaty, S., and Hammarlund, P. (2010, January 19–23). Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU Myth: An Evaluation of Throughput Computing on CPU and GPU. Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA ’10, Saint-Malo, France.10.1145/1815961.1816021 ↗
95. cortical.io (2025, April 26). Third AI Winter Ahead?. Why OpenAI, Google et Co Are Heading Towards a Dead-End., Available online: https://www.cortical.io/blog/third-ai-winter-ahead-why-openai-google-co-are-heading-towards-a-dead-end/.
96. A Readout Scheme for PCM-Based Analog In-Memory Computing With Drift Compensation Through Reference Conductance Tracking10.1109/OJSSCS.2024.3432468 ↗
97. de Macedo Mourelle, L., Nedjah, N., and Pessanha, F.G. (2016). Interprocess Communication via Crossbar for Shared Memory Systems-on-chip. Reconfigurable and Adaptive Computing: Theory and Applications, CRC Press. Chapter 5.10.1201/b19157-8 ↗
98. Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-35-11167.2003 ↗
99. Arabnia, H.R., Deligiannidis, L., Tinetti, F.G., and Tran, Q.N. (2021). Introducing Temporal Behavior to Computing Science. Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-70873-3 ↗
100. Végh, J. (2016). A configurable accelerator for manycores: The Explicitly Many-Processor Approach. arXiv.