Microstructure Dynamic Evolution and Coupling Analysis of Graphite Electrode during the Lithiation Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang A, Zhang L, Cao J, He X, Zhang X, Zhou S, et al. External field regulation of Li deposition in lithium metal batteries. Mater Today Energy. 2024;42:101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101557.10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101557 ↗
2. Liu X, Liu H, Cao Y, Wu X, Shan Z. Silicon nanoparticles embedded in Chemical-Expanded graphite through electrostatic attraction for High-Performance Lithium-Ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(7):9457–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c21866.10.1021/acsami.2c21866 ↗
3. Hu C, Bao H, Lu B, Bao Y, Song Y, Zhang J. Lithiation induced interfacial debonding in carbon fiber structural battery composites. Acta Mech Sin. 2025;42(5):424867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-025-24867-x.10.1007/s10409-025-24867-x ↗
4. Zhao S, Hao J, Zhang L, Liu H, Lin L, An C, et al. Impact of surface microstructures on Diffusion-Induced stress in Lithium-Ion battery electrodes: A Mechanical-Chemical coupling study. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2025;38(3):500–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-024-00570-9.10.1007/s10338-024-00570-9 ↗
5. Xu D, et al. Mechano-Electrochemically promoting lithium atom diffusion and relieving accumulative stress for Deep-Cycling lithium metal anodes. Adv Mater. 2023;35(35):2302872. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202302872. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/.10.1002/adma.202302872 ↗
6. Liu X, Liu H, Dai X, Yang Q, Tao J, Xu J, et al. Scalable silicon@sulfur-doped carbon composites via a low-cost facile method for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. J Alloys Compd. 2023;946:169330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169330.10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169330 ↗
7. An C, Zheng K, Wang S, Wang T, Liu H, Lin L, et al. Advances in sensing technologies for monitoring States of lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2025;625:235633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235633.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235633 ↗
8. Li JH, Zhang bo Y, ran JY, Xu YC, Chu Y, Zhang J, et al. Progress and challenges in the use of carbon anodes for high-energy and fast-charging sodium-ion batteries. New Carbon Materials. 2024;39(5):729–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(24)60870-X.10.1016/S1872-5805(24)60870-X ↗
9. Wu W, Wang A, Xu D, Huang C, Liu X, Hu Z, et al. A soft carbon materials with engineered composition and microstructure for sodium battery anodes. Nano Energy. 2024;128:109880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109880.10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109880 ↗
10. Ji F, Li YL, Feng JM, Su D, Wen YY, Feng Y, et al. Electrochemical performance of graphene nanosheets and ceramic composites as anodes for lithium batteries. J Mater Chem. 2009;19(47):9063–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/B915838C.10.1039/B915838C ↗
11. Xu ZL, Liu X, Luo Y, Zhou L, Kim JK. Nanosilicon anodes for high performance rechargeable batteries. Prog Mater Sci. 2017;90:1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.003.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.003 ↗
12. Shang T, Wen Y, Xiao D, Gu L, Hu YS, Li H. Atomic–scale monitoring of electrode materials in lithium-ion batteries using in situ transmission electron microscopy. Adv Energy Mater. 2017;7(23):1700709. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700709. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/.10.1002/aenm.201700709 ↗
13. Li Q, Zhang J, Zhong L, Geng F, Tao Y, Geng C, et al. Unraveling the key atomic interactions in determining the varying Li/Na/K storage mechanism of hard carbon anodes. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12(37):2201734. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202201734.10.1002/aenm.202201734 ↗
14. Gavilán-Arriazu EM, Pinto OA, López de Mishima BA, Barraco DE, Oviedo OA, Leiva EPM. The kinetic origin of the Daumas-Hérold model for the Li-ion/graphite intercalation system. Electrochem Commun. 2018;93:133–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2018.07.004.10.1016/j.elecom.2018.07.004 ↗
15. Dorff WR, Hofmann U. ber Graphitsalze. Zeitschrift f r anorganische und allgemeine Chemie. 1938;238(1):1–50.10.1002/zaac.19382380102 ↗
16. Daumas N, Herold A. Relations between phase concept and reaction mechanics in graphite insertion compounds. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Des Seances De L Academie Des Sci Serie C. 1969;268(5):373.
17. Sole C, Drewett NE, Hardwick LJ. In situ Raman study of lithium-ion intercalation into microcrystalline graphite. Faraday Discuss. 2014;172(0):223–37. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4FD00079J.10.1039/C4FD00079J ↗
18. Guo Y, Smith RB, Yu Z, Efetov DK, Wang J, Kim P, et al. Li intercalation into graphite: direct optical imaging and Cahn–Hilliard reaction dynamics. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7(11):2151–6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00625.10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00625 ↗
19. Weng S, Wu S, Liu Z, Yang G, Liu X, Zhang X, Zhang C, et al. Localized-domains staging structure and evolution in lithiated graphite. Carbon Energy. 2023;5:1. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.224. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/.10.1002/cey2.224 ↗
20. Li N, Sun MZ, Hwang S, Li S, Zhao HY, Du YP, et al. Non-equilibrium insertion of lithium ions into graphite. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9(20):12080–6. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA02836G.10.1039/D1TA02836G ↗
21. Feng C, Li J, Cheng S, Li M, Chen C, Liao G, et al. An atomistic perspective on lithiation kinetics and morphological evolution in void-involved silicon/carbon nanohybrid. Mater Design. 2020;195:109037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109037.10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109037 ↗
22. Andersen H, Lyder, et al. Strategies for the analysis of graphite electrode function. Adv Energy Mater. 2021;11:2102693. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102693. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/.10.1002/aenm.202102693 ↗
23. Liu H, Li S, Zhu S, Hu Y, Han X, Shi C, et al. How machine learning has driven the development of rechargeable ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202504095.10.1002/aenm.202504095 ↗
24. Dong X, Liu Q, Cui L, Yu Y, Zhang M. Molecular simulation and experimental study on propylene dehumidification through a PVA–PAA blend membrane. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(39):16687–96. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA03687E.10.1039/C4TA03687E ↗
25. Kumar P, Pavan, et al. A comprehensive diffusion-induced stress coupled multiscale modeling and analysis in hard-carbon electrodes of Li-ion batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2023;25(30):20462–72. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/cp/d3cp01967e.10.1039/D3CP01967E ↗
26. Panosetti C, Anniés SB, Grosu C, Seidlmayer S, Scheurer C. DFTB modeling of Lithium-Intercalated graphite with Machine-Learned repulsive potential. J Phys Chem A. 2021;125(2):691–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09388.10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09388 ↗
27. Cordoba A. Spinodal decomposition and domain coarsening in a multilayer Cahn-Hilliard model for lithium intercalation in graphite. Phys Rev E. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024132.10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024132 ↗
28. Tan X, et al. Decoding electrochemical processes of lithium-ion batteries by classical molecular dynamics simulations. Adv Energy Mater. 2024;14(22):2400564. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202400564. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/.10.1002/aenm.202400564 ↗
29. Bian G, Liu F, Zhang T, Ran M, Xue X, Wu D, et al. Elongation enhancement strategies for AISI 430 stainless steel welded joints: insights from molecular dynamics analysis. Acta Mech Sin. 2024;41(2):424019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-024-24019-x.10.1007/s10409-024-24019-x ↗
30. Zhou R, Huang C, Srikanth N, Bai L, Wu MS. Nanoindentation behavior in T-carbon thin films: a molecular dynamics study. Acta Mech Sin. 2024;41(5):124222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-024-24222-x.10.1007/s10409-024-24222-x ↗
31. Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R, Bolintineanu DS, Brown WM, Crozier PS, et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun. 2022;271:108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171.10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
32. Kozioł Z, Gawlik G, Jagielski J. Van der Waals interlayer potential of graphitic structures: from Lennard–Jones to Kolmogorov–Crespy and Lebedeva models. Chin Phys B. 2019;28(9):096101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab38a5.10.1088/1674-1056/ab38a5 ↗
33. Yuan R, Li P, Xu B, Zhang W, Liu J, Zhang C, et al. Graphene oxide effectively removes polyacrylamide from aqueous solution: molecular dynamics simulation and experimental analysis. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(6):106615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106615.10.1016/j.jece.2021.106615 ↗
34. Bedrov Dmitry, Smith Grant D., van Duin Adri CT. Reactions of singly-reduced ethylene carbonate in lithium battery electrolytes: a molecular dynamics simulation study using the ReaxFF. J Phys Chem A. 2012;116(11):2978–85.10.1021/jp210345b ↗
35. Stukowski A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the open visualization tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2009;18(1):015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012.10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
36. Liu Y, Shi H, Wu ZS. Recent status, key strategies and challenging perspectives of fast-charging graphite anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci. 2023;16(11):4834–71. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE02213G.10.1039/D3EE02213G ↗
37. Li Y, Lu Y, Adelhelm P, Titirici MM, Hu YS. Intercalation chemistry of graphite: alkali metal ions and beyond. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(17):4655–87. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CS00162J.10.1039/C9CS00162J ↗
38. Dahn JR. Phase diagram of Li x C 6. Phys Rev B. 1991;44:17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.9170. https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/.10.1103/PhysRevB.44.9170 ↗
39. Asenbauer J, Eisenmann T, Kuenzel M, Kazzazi A, Chen Z, Bresser D. The success story of graphite as a lithium-ion anode material–fundamentals, remaining challenges, recent developments including silicon (oxide) composites. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2020;4(11):5387–416.10.1039/D0SE00175A ↗
40. Kobayashi H, Mark BL, Turin W. Probability, Random Processes, and Statistical Analysis: Applications to Communications, Signal Processing, Queueing Theory and Mathematical Finance. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977770.10.1017/CBO9780511977770 ↗
41. Weng S, Yang G, Zhang S, Liu X, Zhang X, Liu Z, et al. Kinetic limits of graphite anode for Fast-Charging Lithium-Ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023;15(1):215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01183-6.10.1007/s40820-023-01183-6 ↗
42. Persson K, Sethuraman VA, Hardwick LJ, Hinuma Y, Meng YS, Van Der Ven A, et al. Lithium diffusion in graphitic carbon. The journal of physical chemistry letters. 2010;1(8):1176–80.10.1021/jz100188d ↗
43. Han K, Sung, et al. Pulsed field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance and diffusion analysis in battery research. Chem Mater. 2021;33(22):8562–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02891. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/.10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02891 ↗
44. Ye F, et al. Organic zinc-ion battery: planar, π‐conjugated quinone‐based polymer endows ultrafast ion diffusion kinetics. Angew Chem. 2022;134(51):e202214244. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202214244. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/.10.1002/anie.202214244 ↗
45. Bi H, Zhu S, Liang Y, Jiang H, Li Z, Wu S, et al. Improved ions storage performance for various batteries: anatase TiO2 with high-concentration of Ti vacancies. Mater Chem Phys. 2023;301:127591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127591.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127591 ↗
46. Helfferich FG. Kinetics of multistep reactions. Volume 40. Elsevier; 2004.10.1016/S0069-8040(04)80002-5 ↗
47. Thomas S, Jana S, Jun B, Lee CH, Lee SU. Temperature-dependent lithium diffusion in phographene: insights from molecular dynamics simulation. J Ind Eng Chem. 2020;81:287–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.016.10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.016 ↗
48. Zhao Z et al. Buffering super-expandable breathing alloying materials toward zero-expansion anodes: Why and how? Matter 8.6 (2025). https://www.cell.com/matter/fulltext/S2590-2385(25)00186-910.1016/j.matt.2025.102143 ↗
49. Liu XH, Wang JW, Liu Y, Zheng H, Kushima A, Huang S, et al. In situ transmission electron microscopy of electrochemical lithiation, delithiation and deformation of individual graphene nanoribbons. Carbon. 2012;50(10):3836–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.025.10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.025 ↗
50. Xu Z, Shi X, Zhuang X, Wang Z, Sun S, Li K, et al. Chemical strain of graphite-based anode during lithiation and delithiation at various temperatures. Research. 2021. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9842391.10.34133/2021/9842391 ↗
51. Park JS, Lee MH, Jeon IY, Park HS, Baek JB, Song HK. Edge-Exfoliated graphites for facile kinetics of delithiation. ACS Nano. 2012;6(12):10770–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3050227.10.1021/nn3050227 ↗
52. Qi Y, et al. Threefold increase in the young’s modulus of graphite negative electrode during lithium intercalation. J Electrochem Soc. 2010;157(5):A558. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.3327913.10.1149/1.3327913 ↗
53. Xu R, Yang Y, Yin F, Liu P, Cloetens P, Liu Y, et al. Heterogeneous damage in Li-ion batteries: experimental analysis and theoretical modeling. J Mech Phys Solids. 2019;129:160–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2019.05.003.10.1016/j.jmps.2019.05.003 ↗
54. Wang SK, Wu S, Song YC, Gomaa H, An CH, Deng QB, et al. Regulating electrochemical performances of lithium battery by external physical field. Rare Met. 2024;43(6):2391–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-024-02645-5.10.1007/s12598-024-02645-5 ↗