Topology Optimization of Perforated Continua Based on Truss-Like Material Model
Source abstract
Abstract
A topology optimization method from truss-like continua to perforated continua is studied, which is based on the concept of force transmission paths. The force transmission paths are optimized utilizing a truss-like material model. In the optimization procedure, parts of the force transmission paths are removed. Finally, perforated optimal continua are formed by further optimizing the material distribution field. No intermediate densities are suppressed; therefore, no additional technique is involved and no numerical instabilities are created. Structural topologies are presented using material distribution fields rather than the ‘existence’ or ‘inexistence’ of elements. More detailed structures are obtained utilizing less dense elements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Michell AGM. The limits of economy of material in frame structure. Philos Mag. 1904;8(47):589–97.10.1080/14786440409463229 ↗
2. Zhou K, Li X. Topology optimisation for minimum compliance under multiple loads based on continuous distribution of members. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2008;37(1):49–56.10.1007/s00158-007-0214-3 ↗
3. Zhou K, Li X. Topology optimisation of truss-like continua with three member model under stress constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2011;43(4):487–93.10.1007/s00158-010-0584-9 ↗
4. Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1988;71(2):197–224.10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
5. Xie YM, Steven GP. Evolutionary structure optimisation for dynamic problems. Comput Struct. 1996;58(6):1067–73.10.1016/0045-7949(95)00235-9 ↗
6. Sigmund O. Numerical instabilities in topology optimisation: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 1998;16(1):68–75.10.1007/BF01214002 ↗
7. Eschenauer HA, Olhoff N. Topology optimisation of continuum structures: a review. Appl Mech Rev. 2001;54(4):1453–7.10.1115/1.1388075 ↗
8. Kocvara M, Stingl M. Free material optimisation for stress constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2007;33(4–5):323–35.10.1007/s00158-007-0095-5 ↗
9. Pedersen P, Pedersen N. On strength design using free material subjected to multiple load cases. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2013;47(1):7–17.10.1007/s00158-012-0830-4 ↗
10. Hornlein HREM, Kocvara M, Werner R. Material optimisation bridging the gap between conceptual and preliminary design. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2001;5(8):541–54.10.1016/S1270-9638(01)01125-7 ↗
11. Rozvany GIN. Partial relaxation of the orthogonality requirement for classical Michell trusses. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 1997;13(4):271–4.10.1007/BF01197457 ↗
12. Hemp WS. Optimum structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1973.
13. Rozvany GIN. Exact analytical solutions for some popular benchmark problems in topology optimisation. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 1998;15(1):42–8.10.1007/BF01197436 ↗
14. Sigmund O. A 99 line topology optimisation code written in Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2001;21(2):120–7.10.1007/s001580050176 ↗