Pose Tracking and Object Reconstruction Based on Occlusion Relationships in Complex Environments
Source abstract
Abstract
For the reconstruction of objects during hand–object interactions, accurate pose estimation is indispensable. By improving the precision of pose estimation, the accuracy of the 3D reconstruction results can be enhanced. Recently, pose tracking techniques are no longer limited to individual objects, leading to advancements in the reconstruction of objects interacting with other objects. However, most methods struggle to handle incomplete target information in complex scenes and mutual interference between objects in the environment, leading to a decrease in pose estimation accuracy. We proposed an improved algorithm building upon the existing BundleSDF framework, which enables more robust and accurate tracking by considering the occlusion relationships between objects. First of all, for detecting changes in occlusion relationships, we segment the target and compute dual-layer masks. Secondly, rough pose estimation is performed through feature matching, and a keyframe pool is introduced for pose optimization, which is maintained based on occlusion relationships. Lastly, the estimated results of historical frames are used to train an object neural field to assist in the subsequent pose-tracking process. Experimental verification shows that on the HO-3D dataset, our method can significantly improve the accuracy and robustness of object tracking in frequent interactions, providing new ideas for object pose-tracking tasks in complex scenes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Augmented Reality Applications · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Bousmalis, K., Irpan, A., Wohlhart, P., Bai, Y., Kelcey, M., Kalakrishnan, M., Downs, L., Ibarz, J., Pastor, P., and Konolige, K. (2018, January 21–25). Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve efficiency of deep robotic grasping. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QSD, Australia.10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460875 ↗
2. James, S., Wohlhart, P., Kalakrishnan, M., Kalashnikov, D., Irpan, A., Ibarz, J., Levine, S., Hadsell, R., and Bousmalis, K. (2019, January 15–20). Sim-to-real via sim-to-sim: Data-efficient robotic grasping via randomized-to-canonical adaptation networks. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.01291 ↗
3. Morrison, D., Corke, P., and Leitner, J. (2018). Closing the Loop for Robotic Grasping: A Real-time, Generative Grasp Synthesis Approach. arXiv.10.15607/RSS.2018.XIV.021 ↗
4. A survey of deepearning techniques for autonomous driving10.1002/rob.21918 ↗
5. Levinson, J., Askeland, J., Becker, J., Dolson, J., Held, D., Kammel, S., Kolter, J.Z., Langer, D., Pink, O., and Pratt, V. (2011, January 5–9). Towards fully autonomous driving: Systems and algorithms. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Baden-Baden, Germany.10.1109/IVS.2011.5940562 ↗
6. Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I.A.C., Raya, M.A., and Riva, G. (2018). The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature. Front. Psychol., 9.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086 ↗
7. Augmented reality for STEMearning: A systematic review10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 ↗
8. Deepearning on monocular object pose detection and tracking: A comprehensive overview10.1145/3524496 ↗
9. Wang, C., Martín-Martín, R., Xu, D., Lv, J., Lu, C., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., and Zhu, Y. (August, January 31). 6-pack: Category-level 6d pose tracker with anchor-based keypoints. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Paris, France.10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196679 ↗
10. PoseRBPF: A Rao–Blackwellized particle filter for 6-D object pose tracking10.1109/TRO.2021.3056043 ↗
11. Chen, H., Wang, P., Wang, F., Tian, W., Xiong, L., and Li, H. (2022, January 18–24). Epro-pnp: Generalized end-to-end probabilistic perspective-n-points for monocular object pose estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00280 ↗
12. Wen, B., Tremblay, J., Blukis, V., Tyree, S., Müller, T., Evans, A., Fox, D., Kautz, J., and Birchfield, S. (2023, January 17–24). Bundlesdf: Neural 6-dof tracking and 3d reconstruction of unknown objects. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00066 ↗
13. Merrill, N., Guo, Y., Zuo, X., Huang, X., Leutenegger, S., Peng, X., Ren, L., and Huang, G. (2022, January 18–24). Symmetry and Uncertainty-Aware Object SLAM for 6DoF Object Pose Estimation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01448 ↗
14. Salas-Moreno, R.F., Newcombe, R.A., Strasdat, H., Kelly, P.H., and Davison, A.J. (2013, January 23–28). SLAM++: Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping at the Level of Objects. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Portland, OR, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2013.178 ↗
15. McCormac, J., Clark, R., Bloesch, M., Davison, A.J., and Leutenegger, S. (2018, January 5–8). Fusion++: Volumetric Object-Level SLAM. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), Verona, Italy.10.1109/3DV.2018.00015 ↗
16. Wada, K., Sucar, E., James, S., Lenton, D., and Davison, A.J. (2020, January 13–19). MoreFusion: Multi-object Reasoning for 6D Pose Estimation from Volumetric Fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01455 ↗
17. Wen, B., and Bekris, K. (October, January 27). BundleTrack: 6D Pose Tracking for Novel Objects without Instance or Category-Level 3D Models. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9635991 ↗
18. Hampali, S., Rad, M., Oberweger, M., and Lepetit, V. (2020, January 13–19). Honnotate: A method for 3d annotation of hand and object poses. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00326 ↗
19. Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns10.1109/34.88573 ↗
20. Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encoding
21. Azinovic, D., Martin-Brualla, R., Goldman, D.B., Niebner, M., and Thies, J. (2022, January 18–24). Neural RGB-D Surface Reconstruction. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00619 ↗
22. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis10.1145/3503250 ↗
23. NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstruction
24. Cheng, H.K., and Schwing, A.G. (2022, January 23–27). Xmem: Long-term video object segmentation with an atkinson-shiffrin memory model. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Tel Aviv, Israel.10.1007/978-3-031-19815-1_37 ↗
25. Sun, J., Shen, Z., Wang, Y., Bao, H., and Zhou, X. (2021, January 20–25). LoFTR: Detector-freeocal feature matching with transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00881 ↗
26. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography10.1145/358669.358692 ↗
27. Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767965 ↗
28. Huber, P.J. (1992). Robust estimation of aocation parameter. Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_35 ↗
29. Gropp, A., Yariv, L., Haim, N., Atzmon, M., and Lipman, Y. (2020, January 13–18). Implicit geometric regularization forearning shapes. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning. JMLR.org, ICML’20, Virtual.
30. Benchmarking in manipulation research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley object and model set10.1109/MRA.2015.2448951 ↗
31. Zhu, Z., Peng, S., Larsson, V., Xu, W., Bao, H., Cui, Z., Oswald, M.R., and Pollefeys, M. (2022, January 18–24). Nice-slam: Neural implicit scalable encoding for slam. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01245 ↗
32. Slavcheva, M., Kehl, W., Navab, N., and Ilic, S. (2016, January 11–14). Sdf-2-sdf: Highly accurate 3d object reconstruction. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Proceedings, Part I 14.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_41 ↗