Dynamic Scheduling Optimization of Automatic Guide Vehicle for Terminal Delivery under Uncertain Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
As an important part of urban terminal delivery, automated guided vehicles (AGVs) have been widely used in the field of takeout delivery. Due to the real-time generation of takeout orders, the delivery system is required to be extremely dynamic, so the AGV needs to be dynamically scheduled. At the same time, the uncertainty in the delivery process (such as the meal preparation time) further increases the complexity and difficulty of AGV scheduling. Considering the influence of these two factors, the method of embedding a stochastic programming model into a rolling mechanism is adopted to optimize the AGV delivery routing. Specifically, to handle real-time orders under dynamic demand, an optimization mechanism based on a rolling scheduling framework is proposed, which allows the AGV’s route to be continuously updated. Unlike most VRP models, an open chain structure is used to describe the dynamic delivery path of AGVs. In order to deal with the impact of uncertain meal preparation time on route planning, a stochastic programming model is formulated with the purpose of minimizing the expected order timeout rate and the total customer waiting time. In addition, an effective path merging strategy and after-effects strategy are also considered in the model. In order to solve the proposed mathematical programming model, a multi-objective optimization algorithm based on a NSGA-III framework is developed. Finally, a series of experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed model and algorithm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China
Funding
Basic scientific research Project of colleges and universities of Liaoning Province Department of Education in 2024 · Liaoning Province Education Department
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021, November 13). Analysis of the Size and Development Trend of China’s Online Takeout Market in 2021. Available online: https://bg.qianzhan.com/report/detail/300/211112-19960858.html.
2. Giuffrida, N., Fajardo-Calderin, J., Masegosa, A.D., Werner, F., Steudter, M., and Pilla, F. (2022). Optimization and machine learning applied to last-mile logistics: A Review. Sustain., 14.10.3390/su14095329 ↗
3. A new knowledge-guided multi-objective optimisation for the multi-AGV dispatching problem in dynamic production environments10.1080/00207543.2022.2122619 ↗
4. (2024, August 12). Practical Operational Optimization of Meituan’s Intelligent Delivery System. Available online: https://tech.meituan.com/2020/02/20/meituan-delivery-operations-research.html.
5. FooDNet: Toward an Optimized Food Delivery Network based on Spatial Crowdsourcing10.1109/TMC.2018.2861864 ↗
6. Optimization of Rider Scheduling for a Food Delivery Service in O2O Business10.1155/2021/5515909 ↗
7. The Meal Delivery Routing Problem
8. Provably High-Quality Solutions for the Meal Delivery Routing Problem10.1287/trsc.2018.0887 ↗
9. CrowDNet: Enabling a Crowdsourced Object Delivery Network Based on Modern Portfolio Theory10.1109/JIOT.2019.2926255 ↗
10. Dynamic courier routing for a food delivery service10.1016/j.cor.2019.03.008 ↗
11. Research on Coordination and Optimization of Order Allocation and Delivery Route Planning in Take-Out System
12. OCD: Online Crowdsourced Delivery for On-Demand Food10.1109/JIOT.2019.2930984 ↗
13. Multi-objective green meal delivery routing problem based on a two-stage solution strategy10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120627 ↗
14. Online pickup and delivery problem with constrained capacity to minimize latency
15. Abramov, I.V., Abramov, A.I., Nikitin, Y.R., Sosnovich, E., Božek, P., and Stollmann, V. (2015, January 21–23). Diagnostics of electrical drives. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (EDPE), The High Tatras, Slovakia.10.1109/EDPE.2015.7325321 ↗
16. Tapak, P., Kocur, M., Rabek, M., and Matej, J. (2023). Periodical vehicle inspections with smart technology. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127241 ↗
17. The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem: Dynamic Pickup and Delivery with Deadlines and Random Ready Times10.1287/trsc.2020.1000 ↗
18. Receding horizon path planning of automated guided vehicles using a time-space network model10.1002/oca.2654 ↗
19. An efficient genetic algorithm for multi AGV scheduling problem about intelligent warehouse
20. Gao, Y., Chen, C.H., and Chang, D. (2023). A Machine Learning-Based Approach for Multi-AGV Dispatching at Automated Container Terminals. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11071407 ↗
21. Qiu, L., Wang, J., Chen, W., and Wang, H. (2015, January 6–9). Heterogeneous AGV routing problem considering energy consumption. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Zhuhai, China.10.1109/ROBIO.2015.7419049 ↗
22. Multi-objective optimization for AGV energy efficient scheduling problem with customer satisfaction10.3934/math.20231024 ↗
23. Flexible time-space network formulation and hybrid metaheuristic for conflict-free and energy-efficient path planning of automated guided vehicles10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136472 ↗
24. An effective discrete artificial bee colony algorithm for multi-AGVs dispatching problem in a matrix manufacturing workshop10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113675 ↗
25. A new AGV scheduling algorithm based on harmony search for material transfer in a real-world manufacturing system10.1177/1687814018765560 ↗
26. Study on scheduling and path planning problems of multi-AGVs based on a heuristic algorithm in intelligent manufacturing workshop
27. Zheng, J., Wang, S., Wang, L., Chen, J.F., Wang, L., Hao, J., He, R., and Sun, Z. (2020, January 19–24). A two-stage algorithm for fuzzy online order dispatching problem. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Glasgow, UK.10.1109/CEC48606.2020.9185858 ↗
28. Modeling stochastic service time for complex on-demand food delivery10.1007/s40747-022-00719-4 ↗
29. (2014). Advanced Mathematics, Higher Education Press.
30. Jiang, S.Y., Li, X., Zheng, Q., and Wang, L.X. (2009, January 19–21). Approximate equal frequency discretization method. Proceedings of the 2009 WRI global Congress on Intelligent Systems, Xiamen, China.10.1109/GCIS.2009.131 ↗
31. An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: Solving problems with box constraints10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 ↗
32. Jamil, M.A., Nour, M.K., Alotaibi, S.S., Hussain, M.J., Hussaini, S.M., and Naseer, A. (2023). Software Product Line Maintenance Using Multi-Objective Optimization Techniques. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202306.0846.v1 ↗
33. Zhao, X., Zhu, Y., and Mei, Z. (2022). A Many-Objective Joint Parallel Simulation Method for Acoustic Optimization Design of Sound-Absorbing Structures. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12146892 ↗
34. Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems10.1137/S1052623496307510 ↗
35. Sato, M., and Oyama, A. (2021, January 5–7). Comparative Study of Crossovers for Decision Space Diversity of Non-Dominated Solutions. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/SSCI50451.2021.9660042 ↗
36. Waiting strategy for the vehicle routing problem with simultaneous pickup and delivery using genetic algorithm10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113959 ↗
37. Improved NSGA-III using transfer learning and centroid distance for dynamic multi-objective optimization10.1007/s40747-021-00570-z ↗
38. Improving NSGA-III algorithms with information feedback models for large-scale many-objective optimization10.1016/j.future.2020.01.048 ↗
39. IGD Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization Problems10.1109/TEVC.2018.2791283 ↗