journal article·2024-09-10Open access

Improving Quantum Optimization Algorithms by Constraint Relaxation

Tomasz Pecyna, Rafał Różycki

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

Quantum optimization is a significant area of quantum computing research with anticipated near-term quantum advantages. Current quantum optimization algorithms, most of which are hybrid variational-Hamiltonian-based algorithms, struggle to present quantum devices due to noise and decoherence. Existing techniques attempt to mitigate these issues through employing different Hamiltonian encodings or Hamiltonian clause pruning, but they often rely on optimistic assumptions rather than a deep analysis of the problem structure. We demonstrate how to formulate the problem Hamiltonian for a quantum approximate optimization algorithm that satisfies all the requirements to correctly describe the considered tactical aircraft deconfliction problem, achieving higher probabilities for finding solutions compared to previous works. Our results indicate that constructing Hamiltonians from an unconventional, quantum-specific perspective with a high degree of entanglement results in a linear instead of exponential number of entanglement gates instead and superior performance compared to standard formulations. Specifically, we achieve a higher probability of finding feasible solutions: finding solutions in nine out of nine instances compared to standard Hamiltonian formulations and quadratic programming formulations known from quantum annealers, which only found solutions in seven out of nine instances. These findings suggest that there is substantial potential for further research in quantum Hamiltonian design and that gate-based approaches may offer superior optimization performance over quantum annealers in the future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center, IBCH PAS, 61-139 Poznan, Poland

Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland

Funding

Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education · Poznan University of Technology

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer10.1137/S0036144598347011 ↗
2. Grover, L.K. (1996, January 22–24). A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1145/237814.237866 ↗
3. King, A.D., Nocera, A., Rams, M.M., Dziarmaga, J., Wiersema, R., Bernoudy, W., Raymond, J., Kaushal, N., Heinsdorf, N., and Harris, R. (2024). Computational supremacy in quantum simulation. arXiv.
4. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 ↗
5. On the representation of Boolean and real functions as Hamiltonians for quantum computing10.1145/3478519 ↗
6. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., and Gutmann, S. (2014). A quantum approximate optimization algorithm. arXiv.
7. A review on quantum approximate optimization algorithm and its variants10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002 ↗
8. Beweis des adiabatensatzes10.1007/BF01343193 ↗
9. On the product of semi-groups of operators10.1090/S0002-9939-1959-0108732-6 ↗
10. Adiabatic quantum optimization with the wrong Hamiltonian10.1103/PhysRevA.88.062314 ↗
11. Improving Hamiltonian encodings with the Gray code10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042405 ↗
12. Leng, J., Li, J., Peng, Y., and Wu, X. (2024). Expanding Hardware-Efficiently Manipulable Hilbert Space via Hamiltonian Embedding. arXiv.
13. Gogeißl, M., Safi, H., and Mauerer, W. (2024, January 9–15). Quantum Data Encoding Patterns and their Consequences. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Quantum Computing and Quantum-Inspired Technology for Data-Intensive Systems and Applications, Santiago, Chile.10.1145/3665225.3665446 ↗
14. Adaptive quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial problems on a quantum computer10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033029 ↗
15. Wang, Z.D., Zheng, P.L., Wu, B., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Quantum dropout for efficient quantum approximate optimization algorithm on combinatorial optimization problems. arXiv.10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023171 ↗
16. Application of quantum approximate optimization algorithm to job shop scheduling problem10.1016/j.ejor.2023.03.013 ↗
17. Aircraft deconfliction via mathematical programming: Review and insights10.1287/trsc.2021.1056 ↗
18. Pecyna, T., Kurowski, K., Rózycki, R., Waligóra, G., and Węglarz, J. (2024). Quantum Variational Algorithms for the Aircraft Deconfliction Problem. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-63778-0_22 ↗
19. Powell, M.J. (1994). A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation. Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-8330-5_4 ↗