Acute Effects of Soft Tissue Modalities on Muscular Ultrasound Characteristics and Isometric Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Prior to training, many athletes perform different soft-tissue preparation protocols. Many of these protocols involve stretching, foam rolling, and/or percussion massage. Many of these modalities have been studied, but not as a group to observe muscle alterations and differences in males and females. In total, 40 (20 males, 20 females) participants performed five minutes of static stretching, foam rolling, and percussion massage. Pre- and post-isometric leg strength, muscle activation and ultrasound assessments (cross-sectional area, echo intensity, pennation angle, fascicle length, and muscle thickness) were taken. The results indicate that there is no significant difference among modalities, and that they do not significantly alter any muscle characteristic or improve performance. There is a significant difference in size between males and female, with males having larger muscle and greater pennation angles than females. This allows males to generate significantly more muscle force. However, they both respond similarly to each modality. In conclusion, the muscle response to static stretching, foam rolling, and percussion massage do not differ among modalities and do not contribute to an increase or decrease in maximal isometric knee extension with similar effects between males and females.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Human Performance Lab, Department of Health Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, USA
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Warming-up and stretching for improved physical performance and prevention of sports-related injuries10.2165/00007256-198502040-00004 ↗
2. Warm-up strategies for sport and exercise: Mechanisms and applications10.1007/s40279-015-0376-x ↗
3. Does stretching improve performance? a systematic and critical review of the literature10.1097/00042752-200409000-00004 ↗
4. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: A systematic review10.1139/apnm-2015-0235 ↗
5. Effect of static stretching on prevention of injuries for military recruits10.1093/milmed/168.6.442 ↗
6. Effects of stretching on injury risk reduction and balance10.31189/2165-6193-10.3.106 ↗
7. Herrera, E., and Osorio-Fuentealba, C. (2024). Impact of warm-up methods on strength-speed for sprinters in athletics: A mini review. Front. Sports Act. Living, 6.10.3389/fspor.2024.1360414 ↗
8. Kerautret, Y., Di Rienzo, F., Eyssautier, C., and Guillot, A. (2020). Selective effects of manual massage and foam rolling on perceived recovery and performance: Current knowledge and future directions toward robotic massages. Front. Physiol., 11.10.3389/fphys.2020.598898 ↗
9. Effect of sports massage on performance and recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000614 ↗
10. The evidence behind foam rolling: A review
11. The acute effects of a percussive massage treatment with a hypervolt device on plantar flexor muscles’ range of motion and performance
12. An acute bout of static stretching: Effects on force and jumping performance10.1249/01.MSS.0000135775.51937.53 ↗
13. Comparison of a single vibration foam rolling and static stretching exercise on the muscle function and mechanical properties of the hamstring muscles10.52082/jssm.2022.287 ↗
14. Comparing the effects of self-myofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-of-motion in adolescent athletes
15. Effects of static stretching on repeated sprint and change of direction performance10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181867b95 ↗
16. Effects of running, static stretching and practice jumps on explosive force production and jumping performance
17. Acute effects of static stretching and massage on flexibility and jumping performance
18. Effects of self-myofascial release and static stretching on anaerobic power output
19. Muscle architecture adaptations to static stretching training: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1186/s40798-023-00591-7 ↗
20. Dennis, L.G., Blais, E.A., Wagstaff, K.E., Li, L., and Biber, D. (2020). The Effect of Static Stretching on Proprioception, Pennation Angle, and Muscle Power Production. Int. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 6.
21. Measurement of intramuscular fat by muscle echo intensity10.1002/mus.24656 ↗
22. The Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Quadriceps Echo Intensity and Cross-Sectional Area
23. Can changes in echo intensity be used to detect the presence of acute muscle swelling?10.1088/1361-6579/ab122a ↗
24. Effects of static and dynamic stretching on muscle architecture10.5152/tjsm.2019.128 ↗
25. Nakao, S., Ikezoe, T., Yagi, M., Umehara, J., and Nojiri, S. (2023). Changes in echo intensity of the gastrocnemius muscle with passive ankle dorsiflexion: Can echo intensity be used to assess muscle elongation?. Front. Physiol., 14.10.3389/fphys.2023.1197503 ↗
26. Acute effects of static stretching on the shear elastic moduli of the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles in young and elderly women10.1016/j.msksp.2017.09.006 ↗
27. The Effect of Static Stretching Duration on Muscle Blood Volume and Oxygenation10.1519/JSC.0000000000003457 ↗
28. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825c2bc1 ↗
29. Effectiveness of myofascial release: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.06.001 ↗
30. Foam Rolling as a Recovery Tool after an Intense Bout of Physical Activity10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a123db ↗
31. Evaluating acute changes in joint range-of-motion using self-myofascial release, postural alignment exercises, and static stretches10.70252/ZPDY2502 ↗
32. The effects of myofascial release with foam rolling on performance10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182956569 ↗
33. Short-term effects of self-massage combined with home exercise on pain, daily activity, and autonomic function in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome10.1589/jpts.27.217 ↗
34. Research in the water and fascia: Micro-tornadoes, hydrogenated diamonds & nanocrystals
35. Is self-myofascial release an effective preexercise and recovery strategy? A literature review10.1249/JSR.0000000000000148 ↗
36. Effect of Acute Foam Roller and Percussion Therapy on Muscle Architecture and Muscle Stiffness
37. Acute Effect of Different Duration of Foam Rolling Protocols on Muscle Thickness, Pain Pressure Threshold, and Volume Load on Multiple Sets of Knee Extension
38. The effect of self-myofascial release on the pennation angle of the vastus medialis oblique and the vastus lateralis in athletic male individuals: An ultrasound investigation10.26603/001c.35591 ↗
39. Martin, J. (2021). A critical evaluation of percussion massage gun devices as a rehabilitation tool focusing on lower limb mobility: A literature review. SportRxiv.10.31236/osf.io/j9ya8 ↗
40. Comparison of vibration rolling, nonvibration rolling, and static stretching as a warm-up exercise on flexibility, joint proprioception, muscle strength, and balance in young adults10.1080/02640414.2018.1469848 ↗
41. Effects of percussion massage therapy, dynamic stretching, and static stretching on physical performance and balance10.3233/BMR-230069 ↗
42. The Effect Of Percussive Therapy On Musculoskeletal Performance And Experiences Of Pain: A Systematic Literature Review10.26603/001c.73795 ↗
43. Ferreira, R.M., Silva, R., Vigário, P., Martins, P.N., Casanova, F., Fernandes, R.J., and Sampaio, A.R. (2023). The effects of massage guns on performance and recovery: A systematic review. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., 8.10.3390/jfmk8030138 ↗
44. Under the Gun: The effect of percussive massage therapy on physical and perceptual recovery in active adults10.4085/1062-6050-0041.23 ↗
45. Acute effects of percussive therapy on the posterior shoulder muscles differ based on the athlete’s soreness response10.26603/001c.37254 ↗
46. Age-, sex-, and region-specific differences in skeletal muscle size and quality10.1139/apnm-2020-0114 ↗
47. Narrative review of sex differences in muscle strength, endurance, activation, size, fiber type, and strength training participation rates, preferences, motivations, injuries, and neuromuscular adaptations10.1519/JSC.0000000000004329 ↗
48. Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x ↗
49. Influence of an acute bout of self-myofascial release on knee extension force output and electro-mechanical activation of the quadriceps10.26603/ijspt20200732 ↗
50. Effects of a short proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching bout on quadriceps neuromuscular function, flexibility, and vertical jump performance10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182576ffe ↗
51. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the process of obtaining cross-sectional area and echo intensity measurements of muscles from ultrasound images10.15557/JoU.2021.0002 ↗
52. Changes in vastus lateralis fibre cross-sectional area, pennation angle and fascicle length do not predict changes in muscle cross-sectional area10.1113/EP090666 ↗
53. Evidence of muscular adaptations within four weeks of barbell training in women10.1016/j.humov.2015.11.004 ↗
54. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 ↗
55. Reliability of surface electromyography during maximal voluntary isometric contractions, jump landings, and cutting10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2353 ↗
56. Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions
57. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
58. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM
59. The effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roll or roller massager on joint range of motion, muscle recovery, and performance: A systematic review
60. Comfort, P., McMahon, J.J., Lake, J.P., Ripley, N.J., Triplett, N.T., and Haff, G.G. (2024). Relative strength explains the differences in multi-joint rapid force production between sexes. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0296877 ↗
61. Comparison of quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity during an isometric squat between strength-matched men and women
62. Measurement of gastrocnemius muscle elasticity by shear wave elastography: Association with passive ankle joint stiffness and sex differences10.1007/s00421-016-3339-5 ↗
63. Effects of static-stretching and whole-body-vibration during warm-ups on bench-press kinematics in males and females college-aged
64. Dick, T.J., and Hug, F. (2023). Advances in imaging for assessing the design and mechanics of skeletal muscle in vivo. J. Biomech., 155.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111640 ↗
65. Reliability and validity of ultrasound measurements of muscle fascicle length and pennation in humans: A systematic review10.1152/japplphysiol.01430.2011 ↗