journal article·2024-08-09Open access

New Approach for Automated Explanation of Material Phenomena (AA6082) Using Artificial Neural Networks and ChatGPT

Tomaž Goričan, Milan Terčelj, Iztok Peruš

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

Artificial intelligence methods, especially artificial neural networks (ANNs), have increasingly been utilized for the mathematical description of physical phenomena in (metallic) material processing. Traditional methods often fall short in explaining the complex, real-world data observed in production. While ANN models, typically functioning as “black boxes”, improve production efficiency, a deeper understanding of the phenomena, akin to that provided by explicit mathematical formulas, could enhance this efficiency further. This article proposes a general framework that leverages ANNs (i.e., Conditional Average Estimator—CAE) to explain predicted results alongside their graphical presentation, marking a significant improvement over previous approaches and those relying on expert assessments. Unlike existing Explainable AI (XAI) methods, the proposed framework mimics the standard scientific methodology, utilizing minimal parameters for the mathematical representation of physical phenomena and their derivatives. Additionally, it analyzes the reliability and accuracy of the predictions using well-known statistical metrics, transitioning from deterministic to probabilistic descriptions for better handling of real-world phenomena. The proposed approach addresses both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties inherent in the data. The concept is demonstrated through the hot extrusion of aluminum alloy 6082, where CAE ANN models and predicts key parameters, and ChatGPT explains the results, enabling researchers and/or engineers to better understand the phenomena and outcomes obtained by ANNs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia

Department for Materials and Metallurgy, Faculty for Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 12, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Funding

Republic of Slovenia, the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport · Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS)

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Kekez, S., and Kubica, J. (2021). Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Prediction of Mechanical Properties of CNT/CNF Reinforced Concrete. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14195637 ↗
2. Modelling the correlation between processing parameters and properties of maraging steels using artificial neural network10.1016/S0927-0256(03)00092-2 ↗
3. Neural network analysis of the influence of processing on strength and ductility of automotive low carbon sheet steels10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.02.005 ↗
4. Towards improved reliability of the analysis of factors influencing the properties on steel in industrial practice10.2355/isijinternational.49.395 ↗
5. Peruš, I., Kugler, G., Malej, S., and Terčelj, M. (2022). Contour Maps for Simultaneous Increase in Yield Strength and Elongation of Hot Extruded Aluminum Alloy 6082. Metals, 12.10.3390/met12030461 ↗
6. Influence of the chemical composition and process parameters on the mechanical properties of an extruded aluminium alloy for highly loaded structural parts10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.052 ↗
7. Li, J., Du, D., Yang, X., Qiu, Y., and Xiang, S. (2023). Determining Homogenization Parameters and Predicting 5182-Sc-Zr Alloy Properties by Artificial Neural Networks. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16155315 ↗
8. Wu, X., Zhang, H., Cui, H., Ma, Z., Song, W., Yang, W., Jia, L., and Zhang, H. (2019). Quantitative Relationship Analysis of Mechanical Properties with Mg Content and Heat Treatment Parameters in Al–7Si Alloys Using Artificial Neural Network. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12050718 ↗
9. Mosleh, A.O., Kotova, E.G., Kotov, A.D., Gershman, I.S., and Mironov, A.E. (2022). Bearing Aluminum-Based Alloys: Microstructure, Mechanical Characterizations, and Experiment-Based Modeling Approach. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15238394 ↗
10. Wiciak-Pikuła, M., Felusiak-Czyryca, A., and Twardowski, P. (2020). Tool Wear Prediction Based on Artificial Neural Network during Aluminum Matrix Composite Milling. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20205798 ↗
11. Lacki, P., Derlatka, A., Więckowski, W., and Adamus, J. (2024). Development of FSW Process Parameters for Lap Joints Made of Thin 7075 Aluminum Alloy Sheets. Materials, 17.10.20944/preprints202401.0697.v1 ↗
12. Merayo, D., Rodríguez-Prieto, A., and Camacho, A.M. (2020). Prediction of Mechanical Properties by Artificial Neural Networks to Characterize the Plastic Behavior of Aluminum Alloys. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13225227 ↗
13. Jimenez-Martinez, M., Alfaro-Ponce, M., and Muñoz-Ibañez, C. (2022). Design of an Aluminum Alloy Using a Neural Network-Based Model. Metals, 12.10.3390/met12101587 ↗
14. Li, S., Chen, W., Bhandari, K.S., Jung, D.W., and Chen, X. (2022). Flow Behavior of AA5005 Alloy at High Temperature and Low Strain Rate Based on Arrhenius-Type Equation and Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network (BP-ANN) Model. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15113788 ↗
15. Huang, C., Jia, X., and Zhang, Z. (2018). A Modified Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network Model Based on Genetic Algorithm to Predict the Flow Behavior of 5754 Aluminum Alloy. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11050855 ↗
16. Xiong, T., Wang, L., Gao, X., and Liu, G. (2022). Inverse Identification of Residual Stress Distribution in Aluminium Alloy Components Based on Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031195 ↗
17. Rajczakowska, M., Szeląg, M., Habermehl-Cwirzen, K., Hedlund, H., and Cwirzen, A. (2023). Interpretable Machine Learning for Prediction of Post-Fire Self-Healing of Concrete. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16031273 ↗
18. Xue, J., Huang, J., Li, M., Chen, J., Wei, Z., Cheng, Y., Lai, Z., Qu, N., Liu, Y., and Zhu, J. (2023). Explanatory Machine Learning Accelerates the Design of Graphene-Reinforced Aluminium Matrix Composites with Superior Performance. Metals, 13.10.3390/met13101690 ↗
19. Grabec, I., and Sachse, W. (1997). Synergetics of Measurement, Prediction and Control, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-60336-5 ↗
20. Flexural deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns determined by the CAE method10.1002/eqe.584 ↗
21. A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans10.1109/72.97934 ↗
22. Neural network analysis of the influence of chemical composition on surface cracking during hot rolling of AISI D2 tool steel10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.09.009 ↗
23. Amelioration of surface cracking during hot rolling of AISI D2 tool steel10.1080/02670836.2018.1475862 ↗
24. Carpenter, D., Min, W., Lee, S., Ozogul, G., Zheng, X., and Lester, J. (2024, January 20–21). Assessing Student Explanations with Large Language Models Using Fine-Tuning and Few-Shot Learning. Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2024), Mexico City, Mexico.
25. Zhao, J., Yao, Z., Yang, Z., and Yu, H. (2023). SELF-EXPLAIN: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason Complex Questions by Themselves. arXiv.
26. Brin, D., Sorin, V., Barash, Y., Konen, E., Nadkarni, G., Glicksberg, B.S., and Klang, E. (2023). Assessing GPT-4 multimodal performance in radiological image analysis. medRxiv, 2023-11.10.1101/2023.11.15.23298583 ↗
27. Yang, Z., Yao, Z., Tasmin, M., Vashisht, P., Jang, W.S., Ouyang, F., Wang, B., Berlowitz, D., and Yu, H. (2023). Performance of multimodal GPT-4V on USMLE with Image: Potential for imaging diagnostic support with explanations. medRxiv, 2023-10.10.1101/2023.10.26.23297629 ↗
28. Jin, Q., Chen, F., Zhou, Y., Xu, Z., Cheung, J.M., Chen, R., Summers, R.M., Rousseau, J.F., Ni, P., and Landsman, M.J. (2024). Hidden flaws behind expert-level accuracy of gpt-4 vision in medicine. arXiv.10.1038/s41746-024-01185-7 ↗
29. Miao, J., Thongprayoon, C., Cheungpasitporn, W., and Cornell, L.D. (2024). Performance of GPT-4 Vision on kidney pathology exam questions. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., aqae030.10.1093/ajcp/aqae030 ↗
30. OpenAI (2024, March 15). ChatGPT (Version 3.5) [Large Language Model]. Available online: https://chat.openai.com/chat.
31. Intermetallic phase particles in 6082 aluminium alloy
32. The complex microstructures in as-cast Al-Mg-Si alloy10.1016/S0167-577X(99)00141-X ↗
33. Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 6005 and 6082 aluminium alloys
34. Ground-motion prediction by a non-parametric approach10.1002/eqe.1007 ↗
35. Tsuchida, S., and Nakayama, T. (2022). MALDI-Based Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Testing: Focus on Bacterial Identification. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12062814 ↗
36. Shen, J., Li, R., Shi, J., and Zhou, G. (2019). Modified Multi-Support Response Spectrum Analysis of Structures with Multiple Supports under Incoherent Ground Excitation. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9091744 ↗
37. Merrick, L., and Taly, A. (2020, January 25–28). The explanation game: Explaining machine learning models using shapley values. Proceedings of the Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction: 4th IFIP TC 5, TC 12, WG 8.4, WG 8.9, WG 12.9 International Cross-Domain Conference, CD-MAKE 2020, Dublin, Ireland. Proceedings 4.
38. Determination of scrap/supply probability curves for the mechanical properties of aluminium alloys in hot extrusion using a neural network-like approach10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.054 ↗
39. Influence of cooling mode in relation to casting and extrusion parameters on mechanical properties of AA608210.1515/rmzmag-2016-0022 ↗
40. Qayyum, F., Khan, M.A., Kim, D.-H., Ko, H., and Ryu, G.-A. (2023). Explainable AI for Material Property Prediction Based on Energy Cloud: A Shapley-Driven Approach. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16237322 ↗
41. Pradhan, B., Jena, R., Talukdar, D., Mohanty, M., Sahu, B.K., Raul, A.K., and Abdul Maulud, K.N. (2022). A New Method to Evaluate Gold Mineralisation-Potential Mapping Using Deep Learning and an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Model. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14184486 ↗
42. Hoffmann, R., and Reich, C. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Visual Quality Assurance in Manufacturing. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12224572 ↗