journal article·2024-05-29Open access

ROI-Binarized Hyperbolic Region Segmentation and Characterization by Using Deep Residual Convolutional Neural Network with Skip Connection for GPR Imaging

Hua Zhang, Qianwei Dai, Deshan Feng, Xun Wang, Bin Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 11

Abstract

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is a non-destructive geophysical technique utilizing electromagnetic pulses to detect subsurface material properties. The analysis of regions of interest (ROIs) in GPR images often entails the identification of hyperbolic reflection regions of underground targets through accurate segmentation, a crucial preprocessing step. Currently, this represents a research gap. In the hyperbolic reflection region, manual segmentation not only demands professional expertise but is also time-consuming and error-prone. Automatic segmentation can aid in accurately determining the location and depth of the reflection region, thereby enhancing data interpretation and analysis. This study presents a deep residual Convolutional Neural Network (Res-CNN) that integrates skip connections within an encoder-decoder framework for ROI-binarized hyperbolic segmentation. The proposed framework includes designed downsampling and upsampling modules that facilitate feature computation sharing between these two modules through skip connections within network blocks. In the evaluation of both simple and complex models, our method attained PSNR, SSIM, and FSIM values of 57.1894, 0.9933, and 0.9336, and 58.4759, 0.9958, and 0.9677, respectively. Compared to traditional segmentation methods, the proposed approach demonstrated clearer segmentation results, enabling intelligent and effective identification of the ROI region containing abnormal hyperbolic reflection waves in GPR images.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China · the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University · the Hunan Provincial Postgraduate Research Innovation Project

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhou, F., Chen, Z., Liu, H., Cui, J., Spencer, B.F., and Fang, G. (2018). Simultaneous estimation of rebar diameter and cover thickness by a GPR-EMI dual sensor. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18092969 ↗
2. Automated detection of cracks in roads using ground penetrating radar10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104118 ↗
3. Bai, X., Yang, Y., Wen, Z., Wei, S., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Li, H., Tian, H., and Liu, G. (2023). 3D-GPR-RM: A Method for Underground Pipeline Recognition Using 3-Dimensional GPR Images. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137540 ↗
4. Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, W., Yang, X., and Yang, X. (2023). Recognition of Rebar in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data for the Second Lining of a Tunnel. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13053203 ↗
5. Jin, Y., and Duan, Y. (2020). Identification of unstable subsurface rock structure using ground penetrating radar: An eemd-based processing method. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10238499 ↗
6. An automatic GPR B-scan image interpreting model10.1109/TGRS.2018.2799586 ↗
7. Automated detection of reflection hyperbolas in complex GPR images with no a priori knowledge on the medium10.1109/TGRS.2015.2462727 ↗
8. Gamal, M., Di, Q., Zhang, J., Fu, C., Ebrahim, S., and El-Raouf, A.A. (2023). Utilizing Ground-Penetrating Radar for Water Leak Detection and Pipe Material Characterization in Environmental Studies: A Case Study. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15204924 ↗
9. The detection of buried pipes from time-of-flight radar data10.1109/TGRS.2008.917211 ↗
10. Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00055-5 ↗
11. Diffraction Separation by a Coherence Analysis Framework for Ground Penetrating Radar Applications
12. Online dictionary learning method for extracting GPR diffractions10.1093/jge/gxz081 ↗
13. Li, F., Yang, F., Yan, R., Qiao, X., Xing, H., and Li, Y. (2022). Study on significance enhancement algorithm of abnormal features of urban road ground penetrating radar images. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14071546 ↗
14. Histograms of oriented gradients for landmine detection in ground-penetrating radar data10.1109/TGRS.2013.2252016 ↗
15. Okay, M.O., and Samet, R. (2019, January 13–16). An Approach to Detect and Visualize the Anomalies based on GPR Data. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics-Theoretical and Applied Aspects, Kiev, Ukraine.
16. Real-time hyperbola recognition and fitting in GPR data10.1109/TGRS.2016.2592679 ↗
17. GPR image analysis to locate water leaks from buried pipes by applying variance filters10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.03.025 ↗
18. A Comparison Of Segmentation Techniques For Target Extraction In Ground-Penetrating Radar Data10.3997/1873-0604.2003016 ↗
19. Identifying concrete structure defects in GPR image10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107839 ↗
20. Development of Adaptive Threshold and Data Smoothening Algorithm for GPR Imaging10.14429/dsj.68.12354 ↗
21. Li, W., Cui, X., Guo, L., Chen, J., Chen, X., and Cao, X. (2016). Tree root automatic recognition in ground penetrating radar profiles based on randomized Hough transform. Remote Sens., 8.10.3390/rs8050430 ↗
22. Bugarinović, Ž., Pajewski, L., Ristić, A., Vrtunski, M., Govedarica, M., and Borisov, M. (2020). On the introduction of canny operator in an advanced imaging algorithm for real-time detection of hyperbolas in ground-penetrating radar data. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9030541 ↗
23. Buried Objects Segmentation and Detection in GPR B Scan Images
24. Analysis of GPR hyperbola targets using image processing techniques
25. Lameri, S., Lombardi, F., Bestagini, P., Lualdi, M., and Tubaro, S. (September, January 28). Landmine detection from GPR data using convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 2017 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Kos, Greece.10.23919/EUSIPCO.2017.8081259 ↗
26. Picetti, F., Testa, G., Lombardi, F., Bestagini, P., Lualdi, M., and Tubaro, S. (2018, January 4–6). Convolutional autoencoder for landmine detection on GPR scans. Proceedings of the 2018 41st International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/TSP.2018.8441206 ↗
27. A GANs-based deep learning framework for automatic subsurface object recognition from ground penetrating radar data10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064205 ↗
28. Residual CNN+ Bi-LSTM model to analyze GPR B scan images10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103525 ↗
29. Detection and localization of rebar in concrete by deep learning using ground penetrating radar10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103279 ↗
30. Improved Mask R-CNN with distance guided intersection over union for GPR signature detection and segmentation10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103414 ↗
31. Diffraction pattern recognition using deep semantic segmentation10.1002/nsg.12227 ↗
32. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
33. FSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730 ↗
34. Dérobert, X., and Pajewski, L. (2018). TU1208 Open Database of Radargrams: The Dataset of the IFSTTAR Geophysical Test Site. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10040530 ↗