Reconstructed Prototype Network Combined with CDC-TAGCN for Few-Shot Action Recognition
Source abstract
Abstract
Research on few-shot action recognition has received widespread attention recently. However, there are some blind spots in the current research: (1) The prevailing practice in many models is to assign uniform weights to all samples; nevertheless, such an approach may yield detrimental consequences for the model in the presence of high-noise samples. (2) Samples with similar features but different classes make it difficult for the model to be distinguished. (3) Skeleton data harbors rich temporal features, but most encoders face challenges in effectively extracting them. In response to these challenges, this study introduces a reconstructed prototype network (RC-PN) based on a prototype network framework and a novel spatiotemporal encoder. The RC-PN comprises two enhanced modules: Sample coefficient reconstruction (SCR) and a reconstruction loss function (LRC). SCR leverages cosine similarity between samples to reassign sample weights, thereby generating prototypes robust to noise interference and more adept at conveying conceptual essence. Simultaneously, the introduction of LRC enhances the feature similarity among samples of the same class while increasing feature distinctiveness between different classes. In the encoder aspect, this study introduces a novel spatiotemporal convolutional encoder called CDC-TAGCN. The temporal convolution operator is redefined in CDC-TAGCN. The vanilla temporal convolution operator can only capture the surface-level characteristics of action samples. Drawing inspiration from differential convolution (CDC), this research enhances TCN to CDC-TGCN. CDC-TGCN allows for the fusion of discrepant features from action samples into the features extracted by the vanilla convolutional operator. Extensive feasibility and ablation experiments are performed on the skeleton action dataset NTU-RGB + D 120 and Kinetics and compared with recent research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human Pose and Action Recognition · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, F., Fergus, and Perona (2003). Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE.
2. Ma, N., Zhang, H., Li, X., Zhou, S., Zhang, Z., Wen, J., Li, H., Gu, J., and Bu, J. (2022, January 23–27). Learning spatial-preserved skeleton representations for few-shot action recognition. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Tel Aviv, Israel.10.1007/978-3-031-19772-7_11 ↗
3. Cuturi, M., and Blondel, M. (2017, January 6–11). Soft-dtw: A differentiable loss function for time-series. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR), Sydney, Australia.
4. Du, Y., Wang, W., and Wang, L. (2015, January 7–12). Hierarchical recurrent neural network for skeleton based action recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.
5. Byeon, Y.-H., Kim, D., Lee, J., and Kwak, K.-C. (2021). Body and hand–object ROI-based behavior recognition using deep learning. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051838 ↗
6. Ren, J., Reyes, N., Barczak, A., Scogings, C., and Liu, M. (2018, January 13–15). Towards 3D human action recognition using a distilled CNN model. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Signal and Image Processing (ICSIP), Shenzhen, China.10.1109/SIPROCESS.2018.8600485 ↗
7. Skeleton-based action recognition using spatio-temporal LSTM network with trust gates10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2771306 ↗
8. Yu, Z., Zhao, C., Wang, Z., Qin, Y., Su, Z., Li, X., Zhou, F., and Zhao, G. (2020, January 13–19). Searching central difference convolutional networks for face anti-spoofing. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00534 ↗
9. Ntu rgb+ d 120: A large-scale benchmark for 3d human activity understanding10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2916873 ↗
10. Kay, W., Carreira, J., Simonyan, K., Zhang, B., Hillier, C., Vijayanarasimhan, S., Viola, F., Green, T., Back, T., and Natsev, P. (2017). The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv.
11. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research10.2307/1174772 ↗
12. Convolutional Siamese neural network for few-shot multi-view face identification10.1007/s11760-023-02535-w ↗
13. Fault diagnosis method for sucker rod well with few shots based on meta-transfer learning10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110295 ↗
14. Few-shot pump anomaly detection via Diff-WRN-based model-agnostic meta-learning strategy10.1177/14759217221132114 ↗
15. An Extension of Prototypical Networks10.1109/ITNEC48623.2020.9084727 ↗
16. Xie, Z., Duan, P., Liu, W., Kang, X., Wei, X., and Li, S. (2023). Feature consistency-based prototype network for open-set hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3232225 ↗
17. Zhu, L., and Yang, Y. (2018, January 8–14). Compound memory networks for few-shot video classification. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_46 ↗
18. Few-shot activity recognition with cross-modal memory network10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107348 ↗
19. Jiang, L., Yu, J., Dang, Y., Chen, P., and Huan, R. (2023). HiTIM: Hierarchical Task Information Mining for Few-Shot Action Recognition. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13095277 ↗
20. Guo, M., Chou, E., Huang, D.-A., Song, S., Yeung, S., and Li, F. (2018, January 8–14). Neural graph matching networks for fewshot 3d action recognition. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01246-5_40 ↗
21. Careaga, C., Hutchinson, B., Hodas, N., and Phillips, L. (2019). Metric-based few-shot learning for video action recognition. arXiv.
22. Xing, E., Jordan, M., Russell, S.J., and Ng, A. (2002). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
23. Ben-Ari, R., Nacson, M.S., Azulai, O., Barzelay, U., and Rotman, D. (2021, January 20–25). TAEN: Temporal aware embedding network for few-shot action recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00313 ↗
24. A comparative review of recent kinect-based action recognition algorithms10.1109/TIP.2019.2925285 ↗
25. The graph neural network model10.1109/TNN.2008.2005605 ↗
26. Yan, S., Xiong, Y., and Lin, D. (2018, January 2–7). Spatial temporal graph convolutional networks for skeleton-based action recognition. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12328 ↗
27. Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Yuan, C., Li, B., Deng, Y., and Hu, W. (2021, January 10–17). Channel-wise topology refinement graph convolution for skeleton-based action recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01311 ↗
28. Duan, H., Wang, J., Chen, K., and Lin, D. (2022). PYSKL: Towards Good Practices for Skeleton Action Recognition. arXiv.10.1145/3503161.3548546 ↗
29. Hermans, A., Beyer, L., and Leibe, B. (2017). In defense of the triplet loss for person re-identification. arXiv.