journal article·2023-02-11Open access

Effects of Modified Outsole Patterns in Tennis Shoes on Frictional Force and Biomechanical Variables of Lower Extremity Joints

Jaewon Kang, Sihyun Ryu, Ho-Jong Gil, Sang-Kyoon Park

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

(1) Background: This study aimed to examine the effects of four different outsole patterns on frictional force and lower extremities during tennis-specific movements. (2) Methods: Four tennis shoes with different widths of outsole treads were manufactured for this study (A: all thin, B: all thick, C: laterally thin and medially thick, D: medially thick and laterally thin). The frictional force was measured during a mechanical test. Eleven male recreational tennis players participated in the study. The data were collected using sixteen infrared cameras and a force plate for a biomechanical test. (3) Results: During the mechanical test, there was a significant difference between the shoes in the forward and sideward Coefficient of Translational Friction (CoF) and clockwise rotational friction (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in the maximum ankle internal rotation angle during braking motion (p < 0.05). In contrast, a significant difference in the maximum internal rotation moment of the ankle was found during forward braking motion (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Based on these results, the difference in the outsole tread width (0.6 mm) affected mechanical frictional force, but this phenomenon was less influenced by the adaptation of the lower extremity joint’s movement in a tennis-specific motion. Finally, the difference in the outsole pattern affects the rotational movement and moment of the ankle joint. Thus, any slight change in friction by modified outsole patterns of tennis shoes requires close attention to develop the functional requirements for tennis performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Motion Innovation Center, Korea National Sport University, Seoul 1239, Republic of Korea

Fila Advanced Science and Technology Center, FILA Holdings, Busan 1077, Republic of Korea

Funding

Fila Holdings

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Current Issues in the Design of Running and Court Shoes10.1055/s-2000-7866 ↗
2. Determining the protective function of sports footwear10.1080/001401300750004032 ↗
3. Physiological and ergonomics factors in running shoe design10.1016/0003-6870(84)90199-6 ↗
4. Fales, C.W., Stone, R.T., Van Groningen, D., and Westby, B. (2020, January 5–9). Tread Patterns and the Effect on Basketball Player Slippage. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.10.1177/1071181320641317 ↗
5. Werd, M.B., Knight, E.L., and Langer, P.R. (2000). Athletic Footwear and Orthoses in Sports Medicine, Springer.
6. Friction—Slipping—Traction10.1055/s-2007-993502 ↗
7. Increasing Running Shoe Traction Can Enhance Performance10.1108/RJTA-18-02-2014-B003 ↗
8. Shorten, M., Hudson, B., and Himmelsbach, J. (2003, January 21–25). Shoe-surface traction of conventional and in-filled synthetic turf football surfaces. Proceedings of the XIX International Congress on Biomechanics, Dunedin, New Zealand.
9. Identification of critical traction values for maximum athletic performance10.1080/19424280.2011.639807 ↗
10. Science of synthetic turf surfaces: Player–surface interactions10.1080/19346190.2010.504279 ↗
11. The dynamics of slipping accidents10.1016/0376-6349(81)90009-2 ↗
12. Evaluation of the Shoe-Surface Interaction Using an Agility Maneuver10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d7d307 ↗
13. Torque developed at simulated sliding between sport shoes and an artificial turf10.1177/036354658601400308 ↗
14. The effects of surface traction characteristics on frictional demand and kinematics in tennis10.1080/14763141.2013.784799 ↗
15. Resultant knee joint moments for lateral movement tasks on sliding and non-sliding sport surfaces10.1080/02640410802669161 ↗
16. Biomechanical aspects of playing surfaces10.1080/02640418708729771 ↗
17. Influence of basketball shoe mass, outsole traction, and forefoot bending stiffness on three athletic movements10.1080/14763141.2015.1084031 ↗
18. Does visual representation of futsal shoes outsole tread groove design resemblance its mechanical traction, dynamic human traction performance, and perceived traction during change of direction and straight sprint tasks?10.1080/19424280.2020.1825534 ↗
19. Footwear Traction and Lower Extremity Joint Loading10.1177/0363546509359065 ↗
20. Comprehensive evaluation of player-surface interaction on artificial soccer turf10.1080/14763141.2010.511679 ↗
21. Sterzing, T., Müller, C., Schwanitz, S., Odenwald, S., and Milani, T.L. (2008, January 14–18). Discrepancies between mechanical and biomechanical measurements of soccer shoe traction on artificial turf. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
22. Influence of outsole design on centre of rotation during turning movements10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.052 ↗
23. Effects of the playing surface on plantar pressures and potential injuries in tennis10.1136/bjsm.2007.036707 ↗
24. Sliding Allows Faster Repositioning during Tennis Specific Movements on Hard Court10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.157 ↗
25. The influence of tennis court surfaces on player perceptions and biomechanical response10.1080/02640414.2015.1127988 ↗
26. ITF (2022, November 06). Surface Types. Available online: https://www.itftennis.com/media/2169/surfaces-surface-types.pdf.
27. Shoe-surface friction in tennis: Influence on plantar pressure and implications for injury10.1080/19424280.2014.891659 ↗
28. The effect of normal load force and roughness on the dynamic traction developed at the shoe–surface interface in tennis10.1007/s12283-013-0121-3 ↗
29. Modern tennis rackets, balls, and surfaces10.1136/bjsm.2005.023283 ↗
30. Critical shoe contact area ratio for sliding on a tennis hard court
31. Effect of shoe orientation on shoe-surface traction in tennis10.1080/19424280.2013.799573 ↗
32. Monnet, T., Domalain, M., Decatoire, A., Horvais, N., and Lacouture, P. (2014, January 12–16). Sliding on hardcourt surface with specific shoes, prelim-inary results. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Johnson City, TN, USA.
33. Movement for Tennis: The Importance of Lateral Training10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181afe806 ↗
34. The effect of translational and rotational traction on lower extremity joint loading10.1080/02640414.2015.1066023 ↗
35. Hamill, J. (1996, January 25–29). Evaluating sport shoes using ground reaction force data. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Madeira, Portugal.
36. Frederick, E.C. (1993, January 23–26). Optimal frictional properties for sport shoes and sport surfaces. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Amherst, MA, USA.
37. Kinematically mediated effects of sport shoe design: A review10.1080/02640418608732116 ↗
38. Hamill, J., and Ryu, J. (2003). Experiment in Sport Biomechanics, Daehanmedia.
39. Winter, D.A. (2005). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [4th ed.].
40. Lindsey, C. (2022, November 06). Tennis Shoe Traction-Developing a Test Rig to Measure Shoe Traction on Tennis Courts. Available online: https://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/traction.php.
41. The validity and relevance of tests used for the assessment of sports surfaces10.1249/00005768-199002000-00021 ↗
42. Torques developed by different types of shoes on various playing surfaces
43. Tennis Injuries10.1159/000084285 ↗