Tasks Allocation Based on Fuzzy Rules in Fractional Assembly Line with Redundancy
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, assembly line design methodologies have included the possibility of sharing tasks between stations. These approaches increase the throughput, improving the workload balance among the stations. Sharing operations can support the management of assembly lines with task redundancy. The redundancy of the tasks between two consecutive stations improves the robustness of the assembly line to unforeseen events. A control policy that allocates the shared tasks between two adjacent stations is crucial for the performance of the assembly line. This paper proposes a fuzzy approach to distributing the workload of the shared tasks between two consecutive stations. The fuzzy model allows for the distribution of the workload between the stations in a more gradual way. Simulations were conducted to allow for a performance evaluation with a model proposed in the literature. The results show how the fuzzy model improves all the performance measures evaluated; in particular, when the inter-arrival of the raw items is rather stable. In these conditions, the reduction of the average time and its standard deviation is about 50% to 80%, while the reduction of the work in process is about 60% to 90%. These benefits are obtained with a relevant increase of the variations of the average utilization of the stations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Assembly Line Balancing Optimization · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. C-ALB (Collaborative Assembly Line Balancing): A new approach in cobot solutions10.1007/s00170-021-07565-7 ↗
2. Scholl, A. (1999). Balancing and Sequencing Assembly Lines, Physica. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-3-662-11223-6 ↗
3. Equipment selection and task assignment for multiproduct assembly system design10.1007/BF00713158 ↗
4. Human and robot allocation method for hybrid assembly systems10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.128 ↗
5. Performing predefined tasks using the human–robot interaction on speech recognition for an industrial robot10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103903 ↗
6. Muller, C. (2013). Fault-Tolerant Flow-Line Design, an Example from an Automotive Body Shop. [Master’s Thesis, University of Rhode Island].
7. Balancing and cyclically sequencing synchronous, asynchronous, and hybrid unpaced assembly lines10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.012 ↗
8. Mixed-model assembly line balancing with given buffers and product sequence: Model, formulation comparisons and case study10.1007/s10479-017-2711-0 ↗
9. Flexible multimanned assembly line balancing problem: Model, heuristic procedure, and lower bounds for line length minimization10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.006 ↗
10. Assembly line balancing with fractional task allocations10.1080/00207543.2020.1866224 ↗
11. Buffer allocation and preventive maintenance optimization in unreliable production lines10.1007/s10845-014-0963-y ↗
12. Adaptive policy of buffer allocation and preventive maintenance actions in unreliable production lines10.1007/s40092-018-0301-7 ↗
13. Mattfeld, S., and Brinkmann, G. (2016). Logistics Management, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-20863-3 ↗
14. Redundant configuration of automated flow lines based on “Industry 4.0”-technologies”
15. A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs—A review and empirical investigation10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107853 ↗
16. Cohen, Y., Faccio, M., Galizia, F.G., Mora, C., and Pilati, F. (2017, January 9–14). Assembly system configuration through Industry 4.0 principles: The expected change in the actual paradigms. Proceedings of the 20th IFAC World Congress, Toulouse, France.10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2550 ↗
17. High level planning of reconfigurable enterprises: A game theoretic approach10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60470-3 ↗
18. Dynamic line balancing in unpaced mixed-model assembly lines: A problem classification10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.01.012 ↗
19. Throughput maximization in serial production lines with worksharing10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.12.009 ↗
20. Design and operation of dynamic assembly lines using work-sharing10.1080/00207540600707372 ↗
21. Impact of work-sharing on the performance of production line with heterogeneous workers10.24867/IJIEM-2019-4-247 ↗
22. Balanceability of a work-sharing line using floating workers and its comparison with floating work strategy10.1080/00207543.2020.1795291 ↗
23. The assembly line balancing problem with task splitting: A case study10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.382 ↗
24. Back-up strategy for robots’ failures in an automotive assembly system10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.09.015 ↗
25. Muller, C., Spengler, T.S., and Sodhi, M.S. (June, January 31). Robust flowline design for automotive body shops. Proceedings of the 2014 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.
26. Evaluation of redundant configurations and backup stations to support fault tolerant flow line design10.1007/s00170-018-2971-0 ↗
27. Evaluation of redundant configurations in assembly lines with fractional tasks10.1007/s11740-022-01137-8 ↗
28. Application of Fuzzy Logic to Approximate Reasoning Using Linguistic Synthesis10.1109/TC.1977.1674779 ↗