journal article·2022-10-25Open access

Comparison of Patients with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Intermediate Data from the FAR NHL Registry

Alžběta Trčková, Lenka Špinarová, Jindřich Špinar, Jiří Pařenica, Filip Málek, Monika Špinarová, Ondřej Ludka, Jan Krejčí, Jiří Jarkovský, Klára Benešová, Karel Lábr

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 21

Abstract

Introduction: We present the results of a study by the Pharmacology and NeuroHumoral Activation Registry (FAR NHL), which collects data on patients with chronic heart failure. The register contains 1088 patients from three workplaces in the Czech Republic which specialize in the care of patients with heart failure. Objectives: The aim was to obtain a comparison of pharmacotherapy and the incidence of comorbidities in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) versus patients with mid-range (or newly mildly reduced) ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods: Patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% were included and divided into HFrEF with EF below 40% and HFmrEF with EF 40–49%, according to the 2016 ESC Guidelines. In addition to the clinical condition, we also monitored laboratory parameters, comorbidities and pharmacotherapy in the patients. Results: Patients with HFrEF versus HFmrEF are more likely to be male (p < 0.008), younger (p < 0.001), have lower systolic blood pressure and are less likely to have ischemic etiology of heart failure (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in the proportion of comorbidities: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, ischemic lower limb disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were no differences in the proportion of smokers and non-smokers between the groups. Patients with HFrEF have a higher class of New York Heart Association (NYHA), a level of N-terminal fraction of natriuretic peptide B (NT-proBNP), and a higher level of urea and uric acid. They are more often treated with loop diuretics or mineral corticosteroid receptor (MRA) blockers and less often with thiazides (p < 0.001), and also have a worse two-year prognosis. Conclusion: Compared to patients with HFmrEF, patients with HFrEF have more severe heart failure, more pronounced neurohumoral activation and a worse prognosis. They do not differ in the presence of comorbidities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heart Failure Treatment and Management · Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

First Department of Internal Medicine—Cardioangiology, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic

Department of Internal Cardiology Medicine, Faculty Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic

Department of Cardiology, Na Homolce Hospital, 15000 Prague, Czech Republic

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic

Funding

Masaryk University · the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128 ↗
2. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 ↗
3. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
4. Comorbidities, Fragility, and Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients with Midrange Ejection Fraction10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.02.004 ↗
5. Non-Cardiac Comorbidities in Heart Failure with Reduced, Mid-Range and Preserved Ejection Fraction10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.001 ↗
6. A Comprehensive Population-Based Characterization of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction10.1002/ejhf.945 ↗
7. Koufou, E.-E., Arfaras-Melainis, A., Rawal, S., and Kalogeropoulos, A.P. (2021). Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10020203 ↗
8. Heart Failure Disease Management Program, Its Contribution to Established Pharmacotherapy and Long-Term Prognosis in Real Clinical Practice—Retrospective Data Analysis10.5507/bp.2018.059 ↗
9. Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction in CHARM: Characteristics, Outcomes and Effect of Candesartan across the Entire Ejection Fraction Spectrum10.1002/ejhf.1149 ↗
10. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Angiotensin-II-Receptor Antagonists and Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker/Neprilysin Inhibitor Utilization in Heart Failure Patients: Sub-Analysis of a Nation-Wide Population-Based Study in the Czech Republic10.5507/bp.2021.035 ↗
11. Influence of Ejection Fraction on Outcomes and Efficacy of Spironolactone in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction10.1093/eurheartj/ehv464 ↗
12. Beta-Blockers for Heart Failure with Reduced, Mid-Range, and Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Individual Patient-Level Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Trials10.1093/eurheartj/ehx564 ↗
13. Beta-Blockers Utilization in Heart Failure Patients: Sub-Analysis of a Nation-Wide Population-Based Study in the Czech Republic10.5507/bp.2020.057 ↗
14. The Effect of Spironolactone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Severe Heart Failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators10.1056/NEJM199909023411001 ↗
15. EMPHASIS-HF Study Group Eplerenone in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure and Mild Symptoms10.1056/NEJMoa1009492 ↗
16. Eplerenone, a Selective Aldosterone Blocker, in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Myocardial Infarction10.1056/NEJMoa030207 ↗
17. Impact of Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Outcome in Heart Failure with Reduced, Mid-Range and Preserved Ejection Fraction10.1080/00015385.2017.1351239 ↗
18. TIME-CHF Investigators Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: A Distinct Clinical Entity? Insights from the Trial of Intensified versus Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients with Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF)10.1002/ejhf.798 ↗
19. Occurrence and Predictors of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction at Hospital Discharge and in Long-Term Follow-up after Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
20. The Association of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction with Clinical Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction: Findings from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network (ACTION) Registry-Get with the Guidelines (GWTG) Medicare-Linked Database10.1016/j.ahj.2016.05.003 ↗
21. Predictors of the First Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients Who Are Stable Survivors of Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Pulmonary Congestion and/or Left Ventricular Dysfunction: A VALIANT Study10.1093/eurheartj/ehn062 ↗
22. Risk Prediction in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Analysis10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.008 ↗
23. Factors Influencing the Predictive Power of Models for Predicting Mortality and/or Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients with Heart Failure10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.006 ↗
24. Repeated Hospitalizations Predict Mortality in the Community Population with Heart Failure10.1016/j.ahj.2007.01.041 ↗