Functional Assessment and Implementation Studies on the 3D Printing Process in Structural Monitoring Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Construction works, especially in the case of large road or tunnel investments, require the active participation of surveyors. It applies to classic geodetic procedures such as staking out or conducting control measurements and continuously monitoring displacements and deformations. Negative factors at surveying sites may hinder the implementation or directly affect the instruments, especially total stations. Heavy dust and rainfall containing harmful and destructive substances can be mentioned here. Contemporary measuring instruments are technologically complex and expensive devices, often exposed to the sun, wind, and frost. To mainly protect robotic total stations, various preventing housings are used. Practice shows, however, that these are half-hearted solutions, often negatively influencing the accuracy of the surveys. Based on the authors’ professional and scientific experience, a technological line using the modeling and 3D printing of protective housings for robotic electronic total stations has been developed. The workflow includes dedicated online modeling and printing unique instrument covers that best suit certain sites. The prototype was shielded with an additional hydrophobic layer and tested in a geodetic laboratory. The validation results confirm the high usability of the technological line while maintaining the appropriate millimeter level positioning accuracy and effectiveness of the geodetic monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
The Digital Science and Technology Center, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, St. Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, The Military University of Technology in Warsaw, St. Gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Funding
European Union
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Ghilani, D.C., and Wolf, P.R. (2007). Elementary Surveying—An Introduction to Geomatics, Pearson Education Limited. [14th ed.].
2. Investigation of Stability of Precise Geodetic Instruments Used in Deformation Monitoring
3. Multi-sensor geodetic approach for landslide detection and monitoring10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-287-2018 ↗
4. Palazzo, D., Friedmann, R., Nadal, C., Santos Filho, M., Veiga, L., and Faggioni, P. (2006, January 8–13). Dynamic Monitoring of Structures Using a Robotic Total Station. Proceedings of the XXIII FIG Congress, TS 78—Survey Control and Monitoring of Buildings, Munich, Germany.
5. Controls on Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Slope Deformation in an Alpine Valley10.1029/2021JF006353 ↗
6. Glueer, F., Loew, S., Seifert, R., Aaron, J., Grämiger, L., Conzett, S., Limpach, P., Wieser, A., and Manconi, A. (2021). Robotic Total Station Monitoring in High Alpine Paraglacial Environments: Challenges and Solutions from the Great Aletsch Region (Valais, Switzerland). Geosciences, 11.10.3390/geosciences11110471 ↗
7. Pushing the sensitivity limits of RTS-based continuous deformation monitoring of an alpine valley10.1007/s12518-017-0182-2 ↗
8. Image Assisted Total Stations for Structural Health Monitoring—A Review10.3390/geomatics2010001 ↗
9. Investigating support by minimal detectable displacement in confidence region determination and significance test of displacements10.1007/s00190-021-01550-4 ↗
10. Method of Optimal Fitting of Existing Lower-Class Leveling Control Networks to Modernized National Higher-Class Networks10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000273 ↗
11. Pasik, M., Bakuła, K., Różycki, S., Ostrowski, W., Kowalska, M.E., Fijałkowska, A., Rainer, M., Łapiński, S., Sobota, I., and Keina, M. (2021). Glacier Geometry Changes in the Western Shore of Admiralty Bay, King George Island over the Last Decades. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041532 ↗
12. Banoci, D., Klappstein, B., and Maston, W. (2016). Implementation of Real Time Geotechnical Monitoring at an Open PIT mountain Coal Mine in Western Canada (Update). Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Experience, Theory and Practice, CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/b21520-46 ↗
13. Analysis of the variations of measured values in continuous long-term geodetic monitoring10.14311/gi.15.1.2 ↗
14. Accurate and Swift Approach to As-Built Mapping in TBM-Excavated Tunnels10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000184 ↗
15. Sunantyo, T.A., Suryolelolo, K.B., Gjawahir, F., Swastana, A., Darmawan, A., and Adityo, S. (2012, January 6–10). Design and installation for Dam Monitoring Using Multi sensors: A Case Study at Sermo Dam, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2012, TS0–F-Dam and Reservoir Engineering Surveying, 5572, Rome, Italy.
16. The Geodetic Monitoring of the Engineering Structure—A Practical Solution of the Problem in 3D Space
17. Presl, R., and Wieser, A. (2022, May 10). Systematische Einflüsse auf Geodätische Totalstationsmessungen. GeoNews, Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/82726.
18. A Research on 3d Printing Concrete
19. 3D Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction?10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357 ↗
20. Development report of the next generation of civil engineering10.1051/e3sconf/202127201018 ↗
21. Efficiency of 3D printers in Civil Engineering
22. Machado, C., and Davim, J.P. (2020). Industry 4.0 Challenges, Trends, and Solutions in Management and Engineering, CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.10.1201/9781351132992 ↗
23. Garbie, I.H., and Parsaei, H.R. (2021). Reconfigurable Manufacturing Enterprises for Industry 4.0, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429200311 ↗
24. Evaluating Spatial Data Infrastructure as a Data Source for Land Surveying
25. Object Management Group (2022, May 16). Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5.1. Available online: https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF.
26. Kresse, W., and Fadaie, K. (2004). ISO Standards for Geographie Information, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-08039-9 ↗
27. (2022, May 16). ISO 19101-1:2014; Geographic Information—Reference Model—Part 1: Fundamentals. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59164.html.
28. The Processes and Technologies of 3D Printing
29. EOS GmbH (2022, June 14). EOS P 396-Manufacturing of High Quality Parts with Industry 4.0 Integration, Status 05/2022. Available online: https://www.eos.info/03_system-related-assets/system-related-contents/_pdf_system-data-sheets/eos_system_data_sheet_eos_p_396_en.pdf.
30. (2015). Geographic Information—Conceptual Schema Language (Standard No. ISO 19103:2015). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/56734.html.
31. (2015). Geographic Information—Rules for Application Schema (Standard No. ISO 19109:2015). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/59193.html.
32. Grzesik, W., and Ruszaj, A. (2021). Hybrid Manufacturing Processes-Physical Fundamentals, Modelling and Rational Applications, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.10.1007/978-3-030-77107-2 ↗
33. (2022, May 17). Bohnenstingl, Special Surveying Equipment–Complete Catalog English 2022, Version 220314, Updated Last: 20.09.2021. Available online: https://bohnenstingl.de/bohnenstingl-katalog/?lang=en.
34. Reliability of geodetic control measurements of high dams as a guarantee of safety of the construction and the natural environment
35. (2022, May 16). Leica GeoMoS Monitoring Solution. Available online: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/total-stations/software/leica-geomos.
36. (2022, May 16). Leica Nova TM60, Data Sheet, Leica Geosystems AG, Heerbrugg, Switzerland. Available online: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/datasheets.