journal article·2022-02-08Open access

Bridge Natural Frequencies, Numerical Solution versus Experiment

Veronika Valašková, Jozef Melcer

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

The article is dedicated to a numerical and experimental analysis of the basic natural frequencies of a bridge structure. It presents the results obtained using the finite element method and the frequency response functions applied in two variants, using the lumped mass model and the model with a continuously distributed mass, as well as the results obtained using the energy method. It describes a simple experiment to measure the response of a bridge to random excitations from rail traffic, and compares the values of selected natural frequencies obtained by numerical and experimental methods. It offers engineers alternative solutions for their applications in engineering practice. It tries to bring a complicated theory closer to engineering practice in the simplest possible way and, at the same time, arouses interest in its deeper study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Railway Engineering and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Structural Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Bathe, K.J. (2014). Finite Element Procedures, Klaus-Jürgen Bathe. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://www.amazon.com/Finite-Element-Procedures-Klaus-J%C3%BCrgen-Bathe/dp/0979004950.
2. Maia, N.M.M., and Silva, J.M.M. (1997). Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Research Studies Press.
3. Ewins, D.J. (2000). Modal Testing, Theory, Practice, and Application, Research Studies Press.
4. Friswell, M., and Mottershead, J.E. (1996). Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics, Springer Science& Business Media.10.1007/978-94-015-8508-8 ↗
5. A Brief History of 30 Years of Model Updating in Structural Dynamics10.1007/978-3-319-04729-4_6 ↗
6. Structural Dynamic Model Updating Techniques: A State of the Art Review10.1007/s11831-015-9150-3 ↗
7. Sestieri, A., and d´Ambrogio, W. (2003, January 3–6). Frequency Response Function versus Output-Only Modal Testing Identification. Proceedings of the 21st International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
8. Chopra, A.K. (2012). Dynamics of Structures. Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Pearson Education, Prentice Hall. [4th ed.]. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=2016&pages=374&author=J.+Melcer&title=Dynamics+of+Transport+Structures+%28in+Slovak%29.
9. Němec, I. (1990). NE-11, Spatial Structures Composed of Slab-Wall and Beam Elements, Prostorové konstrukce složené z deskostěnových a prutových prvků, Dopravoprojekt. (In Czech).
10. Melcer, J. (2016). Dynamics of Transport Structures, EDIS, University of Žilina.
11. Bendat, J.S., and Piersol, A.G. (2010). Random Data, Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118032428 ↗
12. (1993). DISYS Software for Data Acquisition & Analysis, MERLIN, s.r.o.
13. Melcer, J. (1989). Dynamic Calculation of the Bridge D 201 HMO Crossing the Danube in Bratislava–Right Bridge, VŠDS.