Identification of Typical and Anomalous Patterns in Electricity Consumption
Source abstract
Abstract
Nontechnical losses in electricity distribution networks are often associated with a countries’ socioeconomic situation. Although the amount of global losses is usually known, the separation between technical and commercial (nontechnical) losses will remain one of the main challenges for DSO until smart grids become fully implemented and operational. The most common origins of commercial losses are energy theft and deliberate or accidental failures of energy measuring equipment. In any case, the consequences can be regarded as consumption anomalies. The work described in this paper aims to answer a request from a DSO, for the development of tools to detect consumption anomalies at end-customer facilities (HV, MV and LV), invoking two types of assessment. The first consists of the identification of typical patterns in the set of consumption profiles of a given group or zone and the detection of atypical consumers (outliers) within it. The second assessment involves the exploration of the load diagram evolution of each specific consumer to detect changes in the consumption pattern that could represent situations of probable irregularities. After a representative period, typically 12 months, these assessments are repeated, and the results are compared to the initial ones. The eventual changes in the typical classes or consumption scales are used to build a classifier indicating the risk of anomaly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electricity Theft Detection Techniques · Water Systems and Optimization · Smart Grid Security and Resilience
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), Campus da Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Faculty of Engineering, Porto University, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Le Ray, G., Pinson, P., and Larsen, E.M. (2017, January 18–22). Data-driven demand response characterization and quantification. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Manchester, UK.10.1109/PTC.2017.7981009 ↗
2. Rasouli, V., Gomes, A., and Antunes, C.H. (2020, January 7–9). Characterization of Aggregated Demand-side Flexibility of Small Consumers. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/SEST48500.2020.9203476 ↗
3. A Local Capacity Market Providing Local and System-Wide Flexibility Services10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069949 ↗
4. Kumar, R.S., Raghunatha, T., and Deshpande, R.A. (2013, January 17–20). Segregation of technical and commercial losses in an 11 kV feeder. Proceedings of the 2013 7th IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition (GCC), Doha, Qatar.10.1109/IEEEGCC.2013.6705752 ↗
5. Solutions for detection of non-technical losses in the electricity grid: A review10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.193 ↗
6. Costly throw-ups’: Electricity theft and power disruptions10.1016/j.tej.2015.07.009 ↗
7. De Oliveira, M.E., Padilha-Feltrin, A., and Candian, F.J. (2006, January 15–18). Investigation of the Relationship between Load and Loss Factors for a Brazilian Electric Utility. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America, Caracas, Venezuela.10.1109/TDCLA.2006.311390 ↗
8. Antmann, P. (2009). Reducing Technical and Non-Technical Losses in the Power Sector (Background Paper for the World Bank Group Energy Sector Strategy), World Bank. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20786.
9. Electricity theft: A comparative analysis10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00182-4 ↗
10. Electricity theft: Overview, issues, prevention and a smart meter based approach to control theft10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.037 ↗
11. Electricity theft as a relational issue: A comparative look at Zanzibar, Tanzania, and the Sunderban Islands, India10.1016/j.esd.2011.11.002 ↗
12. Nagi, J., Mohammad, A.M., Yap, K.S., Tiong, S.K., and Ahmed, S.K. (2008, January 1–3). Non-Technical Loss analysis for detection of electricity theft using support vector machines. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 2nd International Power and Energy Conference, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.10.1109/PECON.2008.4762604 ↗
13. Nizar, A.H., Zhao, J.H., and Dong, Z.Y. (2006, January 22–26). Customer Information System Data Pre-Processing with Feature Selection Techniques for Non-Technical Losses Prediction in an Electricity Market. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Power System Technology, Chongqing, China.10.1109/ICPST.2006.321964 ↗
14. Nizar, A.H., and Dong, Z.Y. (2009, January 15–18). Identification and detection of electricity customer behaviour irregularities. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/PSCE.2009.4840253 ↗
15. Detection and Identification of Abnormalities in Customer Consumptions in Power Distribution Systems10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2161621 ↗
16. Kadurek, P., Blom, J., Cobben, J.F.G., and Kling, W.L. (2010, January 11–13). Theft detection and smart metering practices and expectations in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe), Gothenburg, Sweden.10.1109/ISGTEUROPE.2010.5638852 ↗
17. Development of adapted ammeter for fraud detection in low-voltage installations10.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.015 ↗
18. R Core Team (2020). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
19. Kohonen, T. (2001). Self-Organizing Maps, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2 ↗
20. Clustering based day-ahead and hour-ahead bus load forecasting models10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.01.035 ↗
21. Electricity clustering framework for automatic classification of customer loads10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.049 ↗
22. A clustering approach to domestic electricity load profile characterisation using smart metering data10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.039 ↗
23. Two-Stage Pattern Recognition of Load Curves for Classification of Electricity Customers10.1109/TPWRS.2007.901287 ↗
24. A data-mining-based methodology to support MV electricity customers’ characterization10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.035 ↗
25. Lynn, S. (2021, February 17). Self-Organising Maps for Customer Segmentation Using R. Available online: http://www.shanelynn.ie/self-organising-maps-for-customer-segmentation-using-r/.
26. Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm
27. Learning the K in K-means
28. Tavakoli, K., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Kianersi, F., Poczai, P., Etminan, A., and Shooshtari, L. (2021). Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 as an advanced genome editing system in life sciences. BioTech, 10.10.3390/biotech10030014 ↗
29. Hybrid SOM+k-Means clustering to improve planning, operation and management in water distribution systems10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.013 ↗
30. Frank, E., Hall, M.A., and Witten, I.H. (2016). The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques”, Morgan Kaufmann. [4th ed.].
31. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., and Witten, I.H. (2009). The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update, Association for Computing Machinery. SIGKDD Explorations.10.1145/1656274.1656278 ↗
32. Berthold, M.R., Cebron, N., Dill, F., Gabriel, T.R., Kötter, T., Meinl, T., Ohl, P., Sieb, C., Thiel, K., and Wiswedel, B. (2008). KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_38 ↗